The results of the investigation into the crash of MH-17 carried out by the governments of Ukraine, Netherlands, Belgium, Australia, and later Malaysia - but excluding Russia - are due to be released in a few hours
The Fakery of ‘The Free World’
The Fakery of ‘The Free World’
Eric
Zuesse
13
October, 2015
13
October 2015 is the release-date of the
report from
the fake investigation – by the governments of Ukraine,
Netherlands, Belgium, Australia, and later Malaysia — into who and
what and why caused the
shoot-down of the Malaysian MH17 Boeing
airliner over the conflict-zone in Ukraine on 17 July 2014. That’s
the plane which, at the last moment, was inexplicably instructed by
the Ukrainian Government’s Air Traffic Control to go off the normal
course avoiding the Ukrainian civil war zone over the east, and to go
instead right into the war-zone.
The
airliner got shot down with all 298 aboard dead. Obama and his
coup-installed Ukrainian Government blamed Russia immediately, and
the European Union (which knew that he had actually taken Ukraine in
a bloody February 2014 coup that was staged to look like a
‘revolution’) promptly caved to Obama’s demand to hike the
anti-Russia sanctions that had been instituted in March 2014, when
Crimea rejected Obama’s Ukrainian-coup-imposed government and held
a referendum which resulted in Crimea’s switching to become again a
part of Russia, of which Crimea had been a part for hundreds of years
until the Soviet dictator in 1954 had it transferred to Ukraine. And
so Russia is now being punished for enabling self-determination, real
democracy, for the residents of Crimea.
But
Western government-and-‘news’-media lying is hardly only about
Ukraine. For example, look at this:
Right at the start, you see CNN showing this alleged ‘ISIS training video,’ in which the jihadists’ tents are emblazoned with “US”. And yet CNN isn’t drawing any conclusion that this obviously fake video implicates the U.S. Government.
No: instead, at 0:18, the announcer asserts “This is the latest ISIS propaganda.”
Oh, really — ISIS is promoting the U.S.?No, that’s not what CNN is trying to convey: at 0:30 onward, you instead see military expert Anthony Cordesman calling it “a stage set,” “and this isn’t really a training exercise, it’s a video exercise.”
Maybe
he’s noticed the “US” on those tents? Well, that’s fine,
because it really is “a video exercise” (Cordesman’s euphemism
for “propaganda”), but Cordesman tactfully doesn’t assert whose
propaganda this is. Instead, CNN’s ‘reporter’ does that, but
lies because the truth about it isn’t what he’s being paid to
report here.
At
0:50, this same CNN ‘reporter’ who had, just seconds earlier,
introduced the video as constituting “the latest ISIS propaganda,”
concludes, again, “It’s propaganda.” Immediately then, he
simply goes off onto a different tangent, about how dangerous ISIS
is. He ignores the stupidity of his having presumed, at the very
start of his ‘report,’ that it’s “ISIS propaganda,” when
it’s obviously instead U.S. propaganda. And instead of his now
correcting that lie of his, he just leaves it, uncorrected. He
ignores the falsehood that he had earlier stated (and headlined), and
just goes off onto an anti-ISIS tangent. That’s how much contempt
the U.S. mainstream ‘news’ media have of their own audience.
They
have contempt not just for the public but for the victims of the MH17
mass-murder.
This
is the ‘news’ media of a dictatorship, not of a democracy. It’s
propaganda, not news. It misrepresents, misdirects, misinforms, and
places blame where it doesn’t belong.
And
that’s why Russia’s leader, Vladimir Putin, discussing on October
7th, French President Francois Hollande’s suggestion that Russia
should cooperate with “the moderate rebel groups in Syria,” or
“the Free Syrian Army,” made reference to
the
so-called Free Syrian Army. However, we do not know where it is and
who heads it. But if we assume that this military wing that
constitutes a so-called healthy part of the opposition, if it were
even possible to combine their efforts into the fight against the
common enemy, the terrorist organizations — al-Nusra and others
like them — then it would create good preconditions for further
political settlement in Syria.
Perhaps
he was thinking that the supposed rebel fighters who were shown in
that video constitute the “moderate rebels” that the West was
backing, and which CNN called “ISIS”?
What
can Western leaders do, except have big guffaws about how stupid
their audience must be, to go for their lies?
Investigative
historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of They’re Not
Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records,
1910-2010, and of CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created
Christianity.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.