Bradley
Manning Verdict Convicts Washington
“Willingness
to corrupt the law has become the highest qualification for
appointment to a judgeship or as a US Attorney.”
Paul
Craig Roberts
2
November, 2013
Bradley
Manning’s conviction is more conclusive evidence that the US
government is illegitimate. Manning’s “trial” was equivalent to
Joseph Stalin’s “trial” of Nikolai Bukharin. It did not take
place in a real court with a real jury. The military officer who
served as a “judge” was not impartial. Manning was convicted for
obeying the US Military Code and doing his sworn duty to report war
crimes. There is no difference between Manning’s “conviction”
and the “conviction” of Bukharin as a capitalist spy. Both trials
were political trials.
Americans
are a gullible people. They do not understand that the “justice
system” is corrupted. Prosecutors and judges have no interest in
innocence or guilt. For them conviction alone is the mark of career
success. The more people a prosecutor can put in prison, the more
successful his career. The more judges bend justice to serve the
success of the government’s case, the greater the probability of
promotion to higher judicial office. American “justice” has
degenerated. Willingness to corrupt the law has become the highest
qualification for appointment to a judgeship or as a US Attorney.
If
Manning had been permitted a real trial, possibly jurors might have
weighed the evidence. Did Manning obey the Military Code or disobey
it? Did Manning serve the public interest or harm it? But, of course,
nothing relevant was part of the trial. In American courts today,
exculpatory evidence is not allowed into the courtroom.
If
a poor person steals a loaf of bread, the government can turn the
case into an act of terrorist sabotage. That’s more or less what
the government did to Bradley Manning.
#
# # #
Paul Craig Roberts, Boiling Frogs Post contributing author, is a former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury and former associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He has been reporting on executive branch and cases of prosecutorial abuse for two decades. He has written or co-written eight books, contributed chapters to numerous books, and has published many articles in journals of scholarship. Mr. Roberts has testified before congressional committees on 30 occasions on issues of economic policy, and has been a critic of both Democratic and Republican administrations. You can visit his website here.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.