US Deploys Troops Along Syria-Turkey Border
29
April, 2017
Just
three days after Turkish warplanes killed at least 20 US-backed
Kurdish fighters along the Turkey-Syria border as well as several
Kurdish peshmerga troops on Mount Sinjar in northwestern Iraq,
footage posted by Syrian activists showed the US has deployed troops
and APCs in the contested region, in a move that could potentially
drag the US in a conflict where it already finds itself mediating
between two so-called US ally forces in the proxy war against Syria.
The
Turkish airstrikes also wounded 18 members of the U.S.-backed
People's Protection Units, or Y.P.G., were criticized by both the
U.S. and Russia. The YPG is a close U.S. ally in the theatrical fight
against the Islamic State (whose real purpose is destabilizing the
Assad regime); it is seen by Ankara as a terrorist group because of
its ties to Turkey's Kurdish rebels. The problem is that Turkey is
also an ally of the US, although over the past two years relations
between Turkey and all western NATO allies have deteriorated
substantially for numerous familiar, and extensively discussed in the
past, reasons.
On
one hand, further clashes between Turkish and Kurdish forces in Syria
could potentially undermine the U.S.-led war on the Islamic State
group. On the other, it risks taking an already unstable situation in
Syria and escalating it substantially, should Turkey again find
itself invading Turkey and/or Iraq.
Which
is why the US appears to have deployed troops along the border: to
serve as a deterrent to further Turkish attacks.
A
senior Kurdish official, Ilham Ahmad told The Associated Press that
American forces began carrying out patrols along the border Thursday
along with reconnaissance flights in the area. She said the
deployment was in principle temporary, but may become more permanent.
Another Kurdish activist said the deployment is ongoing, adding that
it stretches from the Iraqi border to areas past Darbasiyah in the
largely Kurdish part of eastern Syria.
"The
U.S. role has now become more like a buffer force between us and the
Turks on all front lines," he said. He said U.S. forces will
also deploy as a separation force in areas where the Turkish-backed
Syrian fighting forces and the Kurdish forces meet.
As
noted above, the US intervention is meant to send a "a message
of reassurance for the Kurds and almost a warning message" to
the Turks, he said.
Navy
Capt. Jeff Davis, a Pentagon spokesman, did not dispute that U.S.
troops are operating with elements of the Syrian Democratic Forces
(SDF) along the Turkish border, but he would not get into specifics.
The SDF is a Kurdish-dominated alliance fighting IS that includes
Arab fighters.
"We
have U.S. forces that are there throughout the entirety of northern
Syria that operate with our Syrian Democratic Force partners,"
Davis said. "The border is among the areas where they operate."
He said the U.S. wants the SDF to focus on liberating the IS-held
town of Tabqa and the extremist group's de facto capital, Raqqa, "and
not be drawn into conflicts elsewhere."
*
* *
Confirming
that the proxy war in Syria is becoming ever less so, the U.S. has
recently shifted from working quietly behind the scenes in Syria's
conflict toward overt displays of U.S. force in an attempt to shape
the fight. Last month, about 200 Marines rolled into northern Syria
backed with howitzers, significantly widening America's footprint in
a highly toxic battlefield. The Marines' deployment came days after
another intervention, when dozens of army troops drove outside the
town of Manbij, riding Stryker armored vehicles, following an earlier
conflagration of fighting between Syrian Kurdish troops and Turkish
troops. The U.S. deployment in Manbij intentionally put Americans in
the middle of that rivalry, hoping to cool it down.
The
SDF retook Manbij from IS control, and Turkey said it won't allow the
town to be under Kurdish control, threatening to move on it. The
American presence appears intended to reassure Ankara the Kurds don't
hold the town.
But
the new deployment puts U.S. troops directly along the border with
Turkey, another flashpoint, and immerses Washington into that
increasingly hot fight. Should Erdogan happen to launch a strike
against a zone containing US troops, he can simply say he was aiming
elsewhere, although the retaliation by his NATO ally would be prompt.
It
remains unclear if the US is now actively seeking to engage Turkey on
the combat field, and is looking for a politically correct, and media
friendly pretext to do so. It is also unclear what a conflict
between the US and Turkey would mean for the rest of NATO: it
certainly would set a precedent, as never before has fighting broken
out between two alliance members.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.