Unlike the media here in New Zealand the Australian media does not seem to be totally behind the government's climate change agenda. There is also some journalism going on, even at Fairfax which has been decimated in recent years.
Great Barrier Reef will be 'slaughtered': scientists dismiss Julie Bishop's claim reef not at risk
21
November, 2014
World-leading
scientists say the Great Barrier Reef will be "slaughtered"
this century as seas warm and become more acidic, dismissing comments
by Foreign Affairs Minister Julie Bishop that Australia's natural
icon was not at risk.
Ms
Bishop told Sky News on Friday her
office had sent the White House a briefing outlining the Australia's
efforts to preserve the reef after US President Barack Obama's
warning in Brisbane last weekend that its "incredible natural
glory" was threatened by climate change.
Scientists
have dismissed Foreign Minister Julie Bishop's comments that the
Great Barrier Reef was not at risk. Photo:
Tourism and Events Queensland
"Of
course, the Great Barrier Reef will be conserved for generations to
come. And we do not believe that it is in danger," Ms Bishop
said.
Mr
Obama told
the University of Queensland audience on the sidelines of the G20
meeting he
wanted the reef to still exist "50 years from now" so his
grandchildren could visit.
While
Ms Bishop and other Coalition leaders have criticised the US
President's intervention, leading scientists have come to his
support.
Scientists
say rising temperatures and acidity are two long-term threats to the
Great Barrier Reef.
Mr
Obama was "right on the money", Ove Hoegh-Guldberg,
director of the university's Global Change Institute, said. "He
was stating a fact.
"We
have one of the jewels of the planet in our possession and we should
care a lot about climate and he wasn't getting that from our leader
[Prime Minister Tony Abbott]," Dr Hoegh-Guldberg said.
Peer-reviewed
research published by Dr Hoegh-Guldberg in 2012 said the global
agreement to limit CO₂ concentrations to 450 parts per million in a
bid to keep global warming to under 2 degrees from pre-industrial
times would
not be enough to protect the reefs.
Any
increase above 1.5 degrees would be devastating, the research found.
The
reef has already shrunk by half in 30 years, he added, with climate
change a factor in its retreat.
Threats
Charlie
Veron, a former chief scientist at the Australian Institute of Marine
Science, went further, saying the Abbott government was downplaying
the dire future facing the Great Barrier Reef and coral reefs
everywhere.
"In
the long term, that is the whole of this century, we are going to
have the Great Barrier Reef slaughtered," Dr Veron, a world
authority who has scientifically named about one-quarter of all known
corals, said.
"There's
no doubt about that at all, if carbon-dioxide emissions keep on
tracking as they are."
CO₂,
as the major greenhouse gas, traps radiation, heating up the planet.
While natural variability plays a role, the background warming
continues apace with 2014 on course to be the hottest year on
record, the
US National Atmospheric and Oceanic Administration
reported on Thursday.
The
immediate threat is another outbreak of bleaching – some of which
is now being detected – as ocean temperatures warm, disrupting
coral ecosystems, Dr Veron said.
"In
the short-term, the Great Barrier Reef is incredibly at risk from
mass bleaching from the warming of the oceans," he said.
He
also dismissed the federal and Queensland governments' Reef
2050 Long-Term Sustainability Plan,
released earlier this year.
"It's
basically a five-year plan to head off UNESCO," Dr Veron said,
referring to the UN body's review of the Great Barrier Reef's World
Heritage status due for completion by mid-2015.
Cid effect
Dr
Hoegh-Guldberg said government efforts to curb run-off of farm
chemicals and the recent decision to ban off-shore dumping of dredge
spoil – after approving major works to expand the Abbot Point coal
port – would go some way to aid the reef's ability to cope with
near-term challenges.
The
increased concentration of CO₂ not only heats the atmosphere, it
also results in an increase in the acidity of the world's oceans as
carbon gets absorbed by the seas.
"It's
just chemistry ... you can't deny that," Dr Hoegh-Guldberg said.
"It's
dropped the amount of crucial building blocks for skeletons and
shells by 26 per cent," he said.
"That's
then had an impact on the abilities of corals and other organisms to
build their skeletons and to rebuild them after storms, after damage
from crown of thorns [starfish] and so on."
Work
at the James Cook University has shown that altered chemistry affects
some fish in ways that reduce their ability to identify predators and
even find their way home.
"It's
just one of many, many significant changes that we are yet to
discover," Dr Hoegh-Guldberg said.
The
health of the reef was also covered in the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change reports,
which predicted "significant change in community composition and
structure of coral reef systems in Australia".
"The
ability of corals to adapt naturally to rising temperatures and
acidification appears limited," the chapter on Australasia said.
Contradiction
Jon
Brodie, a chief research scientist from James Cook University, said
Ms Bishop's comments contradicted the government's own report on the
state of the reef.
The
Great Barrier Reef Outlook Report 2014 "found
the reef to be in poor condition and the outlook is for continuing
deterioration," Dr Brodie said. "It's obviously in danger."
"Climate
change remains the most serious threat to the Great Barrier Reef and
is likely to have far-reaching consequences in the decades to come,"
the report said.
Dr
Brodie said government efforts to improve the reef's water quality
had made some headway "but it's small progress". He noted
that the government had extended targets out to 2018 because goals
set in 2009 had not been met.
The
government's 2050 action plan, still in a draft stage, will
"absolutely not work", Dr Brodie said, adding that it so
far fails to set goals to address long-term threats such as climate
change.
"Under
that plan, the reef will continue to decline," he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.