Using
State Spies to attack political opponents – why the SIS are gaining
new surveillance powers
National
will only be able to get away with what is being revealed by the IGIS
report into the Secret Intelligence Service if we, the people of NZ,
let them. And. We. Should. Not. Let. Them.
Martyn Bradbury
25
November, 2014
National
will only be able to get away with what is being revealed by the
IGIS report into the Secret Intelligence Service if we, the people of
NZ, let them.
And.
We. Should. Not. Let. Them.
State
spies editing intelligence to give a false impression of a political
opponent of the Government
is as bad as it gets. The only thing worse than what they’ve been
caught doing would be an open FaceBook conversation between Key, the
head of the GCSB, Military Chief-of-staffs, Cameron Slater and
Vladimir Putin about mounting a military cup.
The
news media crucified Helen Clark for signing a painting she
didn’t paint, crucified her over a speeding ticket and crucified
her over water saving shower heads and power saving lightbulbs, yet
here is the Prime Minister’s Office directing the use of the State
Intelligence apparatus to hand someone as unstable as Slater
edited state secrets to attack Labour with.
Other
questions are now raised, did Judith
Collins feed Slater for the same purposes?
Why
was Key allowed to declassify intelligence reports for political
gain?
And why
were the security reviews for these new SIS powers never written?
All
of this is an abuse of power that tracks directly into John
Key’s office. The idea Key, who runs the state spy agency and who
rings Slater regularly, didn’t know what was going on is
simply unbelievable.
But
that’s not the only unbelievable part of this gross abuse of power.
Using Muslims to frighten NZers so Key can ram through new SIS powers
under urgency before Christmas is divisive hate politics at their
most Machiavellian.
What
is truly horrifying about allowing the SIS to break into our homes
and plant cameras to record us for 48 hours without a warrant, is
that these powers have already been given to the NZ Police.
When
the Police were caught illegally spying on the Urewera ‘terrorists’,
Key ‘punished’ them by retrospectively cleansing the Police of
any illegality and he legalised that kind of warrantless
spying. The NZ Police, who have shown time and time again that they
are a law unto themselves with very poor legal oversights, should not
have such extraordinary search and surveillance powers and the Search
and Surveillance Bill remains one of the great civil right erosions
committed by this Government.
In
the case of the Police, the media spin was these powers needed to be
used against organised crime. The trick however was that for the
powers to be invoked, the definition of ‘gang’ had to be met.
That definition was 3 people who knew each other and had the same
motive. That allows for far more people than just organised crime.
The
reason why the SIS are now gaining these powers is that there must be
some trepidation within the police force to start using these powers
against activists, so the SIS will gain them and do it instead. On
The Nation last weekend, Chris
Finlayson let slip the most important aspect of this new power,
that it won’t be just used against religious groups. This time
around the bogeymen being used to spook us is Islamic Terrorists, yet
the power for the SIS to break into our homes, plant spy cameras and
spy on us for 48 hours without a warrant can be used against
everyone.
We
were conned into letting the Police have this power, we are being
conned again to let them have even more power in the wake of a
damning report showing they are abusing the power they currently
have.
Key
dismissed Dirty Politics
and Nicky Hager as left wing conspiracy theorists and the NZ public
believed him and re-elected him with an even larger majority. The
scope of criticism in this report however demands a Royal Commission
of Inquiry, and that is what must now be demanded by even those who
voted National.
This
isn’t about right wing or left wing, this is about Executive Power
and its misuse. If we tolerate this, if we simply shrug and say it’s
politics as usual, then we stand for nothing.
Our
democracy deserves better than this.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.