China's
Taking The Gloves Off In The South China Sea By Boarding Ships Any
Place It Likes
26
April, 2012
Starting
January 1 police in the southern Chinese island province of
Hainan will
board ships which enter what China considers its territory in
the South China Sea, Ben Blanchard and Manuel Mogato
of Reuters report.
"Activities
such as entering the island province's waters without permission ...
and engaging in publicity that threatens national security are
illegal," the China Daily said. "If foreign ships or crew
members violate regulations, Hainan police have the right to take
over the ships or their communication systems."
The
aggressive move raises the stakes in Asia's biggest trouble spot,
which includes some of the world's busiest shipping lanes through
which more than half the globe's oil tanker traffic passes.
"That
cannot be," Marine Lt.-Gen. Juancho Sabban, commander
of Filipino military forces in the contested area, told
Reuters. "That's a violation of the international passage
(rights)."
Several
Asian countries claim sovereignty over small islands in the area that
are significant as strategic territorial waters and potentially
exclusive economic zones rich in natural resources and fish.
Dr.
Ely Ratner,
a Fellow at the Center for a New American Security, told BI that
the move is the latest manifestation of China using diplomatic,
economic or military coercion to advance territorial claims in the
South China Sea and the East China Sea.
However,
what's new here is that in other conflicts – such as
the Scarborough Shoal, Sansha
City or
the Senkaku
islands – China
has said it is reacting to provocations from other nations, whereas
in this case there is no claim that it is a reaction.
"It's
unquestionably escalatory and destabilizing,"
Ratner said. "This is a unilateral action by China, and
is the
type of [proactive maneuver] that people have been worrying a lot
about and keeping an eye out for."
Ratner
said "there's no doubt that in the medium term the diplomatic
pushback both within the regional and [from] outside powers is going
to be pretty strong" given the fact that the world economy is
largely dependent on freedom of navigation and freedom of passage
through the South China Sea.
The
U.S. – which has repeatedly emphasized that it has a national
interest in free navigation in the region – has shifted
military resources back
to Asia.
|
What
makes China's decree difficult to counter is that Beijing is using
non-military and law enforcement agencies (which
makes it appear less threatening than if they used naval ships) and
have not expressed an interest in developing a code of conduct that
would provide nations with a protocol for how to behave around
disputed waters or even an interest in discussing what islands are
disputed.
But
that doesn't mean China will get away with it in the long run.
"This
is not a long-term winning strategy for the Chinese," Ratner
said. "Every time they do something like this, what we see is
both enhanced cooperation among the regional states – and we're
starting to see some of that already – and increased demand for
U.S. presence and diplomatic participation in the region."
The
enhanced U.S. attention has emboldened countries such as the
Philippines and Vietnam to take a tougher stance against Beijing.
Ratner said that the regional nations and the U.S. can speak with one
voice on these issues, "they can provide a diplomatic
counterweight to some of these activities."
Ratner
noted that the U.S. will likely continue to place these types of
incidents in the broader perspective of U.S.-China relations
to communicate the seriousness of the stakes.
"It's
really a questions of how far China is willing to go—they
pass laws like [this] but are they actually willing to get out on the
high seas and start arresting fisherman or whomever thinks they are
in international waters or disputed territory where they have been
fishing or doing their business for centuries?" Ratner said.
"China
is the elephant in the room here and they are the ones that will
ultimately decide if this gets resolved peacefully or not."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.