Maersk
Container Vessels Sailing Slower Than 1870s Clipper Ships
20
November, 2012
There
are many commodities and firms that are used as bellwethers of
national or global health, but one that is often consistently
accurate as a measure of international trade is the container
shipping industry.
How
ironic, then, that faced with dire economic challenges, many lines,
including A.P. Moeller-Maersk, are operating their vessels in “slow
steaming” mode to conserve fuel (and hence costs) to such an extent
that they are sailing more slowly on the Asia-to-Europe route than
the great sailing clippers of the 1870s, such as the Cutty Sark.
The
industry was faced with similar cycles of boom and bust then as it is
now, even if the cargoes have changed from tea and wool to
electronics and clothing.
Looking
at container freight rates from Asian markets to Europe and
West-Coast US serves to illustrate the relative performance of the US
and Europe — indeed, so sensitive is the measure that northern and
southern Europe have diverged as the Mediterranean focussed debt
crisis has worsened.
Rates from Asia to the US
across the Pacific have looked firm as a pick-up in housing and
relatively solid industrial production have supported demand.
Bloomberg
reports the Transpacific Stabilization Agreement, a group for
container lines operating on Asia-US routes, has set a guideline to
raise rates by $800 per container box in annual contracts that takes
effect around May 1, while Maersk, the world’s largest container
line, in cooperation with other container lines, has agreed to seek a
$400 per 40-foot box increase in Asia-to-West Coast US fees still
this year.
Meanwhile,
Asia-Europe rates have slumped since the end of June to an average
$1,225 per 20-foot container, below what Bloomberg reports is
break-even at $1,250 to $1,350/20-ft box. Southern Europe is even
worse — rates have dropped 46 percent to $955 as the usually
similar north and south Europe rates have diverged.
Demand
of course is the reason. Most lines operate a similar number of
services to north and south Europe, but with only Germany offering
any consistent levels of demand, excess supply is forcing lines to
fight for every scrap of business.
Rather
tellingly, Maersk has publicly stated it will no longer be investing
in its shipping business in preference to its other activities such
as oil production, port operations and drilling rigs over the next
five years.
Like
the supertankers it operates, though such change comes slowly, Maersk
will follow France’s CMA CGM, which has a world-record-breaking
16,000 TEU-equivalent vessel called the Marco Polo (on its maiden
voyage from Asia to Europe this month), when the Danish line takes
delivery of their even-larger 18,000 TEU vessel in 2013.
Such
vessels ordered at the height of the market are adding more and more
capacity to an industry awash with capacity. Rates haven’t yet
dropped on the northern Europe route to the sub-$1,000 level of late
last year, but only due to a fragile alliance among lines desperate
to keep rates up this year.
If
Germany falls into recession as expected in the fourth quarter, rates
to northern Europe could follow, in which case no amount of slow
sailing will stem the red ink among shipping lines dependent on that
trade.
Great post. I am doing research on international shipping companies for a paper that I am writing, that is how I came across your post. I am glad I did because this post is very informative and helpful. Thanks so much for sharing.
ReplyDeleteI am pleased. Best of luck with your research. For similar stories on shipping and the economy try http://ricefarmer.blogspot.co.nz/
ReplyDelete