Mankind
must go green or die, says Prince Charles
Environmental
damage left unchecked would be ‘suicide on a grand scale’, Prince
warns
23 November, 2012
The
Prince of Wales has warned that mankind is on the brink of
“committing suicide on a grand scale” unless urgent progress is
made in tackling green issues such as carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions,
intensive farming and resource depletion.
Adopting
uncharacteristically apocalyptic language, the Prince said the world
was heading towards a “terrifying point of no return” and that
future generations faced an “unimaginable future” on a toxic
planet.
In
a pre-recorded speech broadcast in acceptance of an lifetime
environmental achievement award, the Prince said green views that had
once seen him written off as a “crank” were now backed by hard
evidence.
He
told the gala ceremony for the 7th International Green Awards at
Battersea Power Station in London that fossil fuels and supplies of
fresh water were under pressure while the stability of weather
patterns was threatened and “vast amounts of CO2” were still
pumped into the atmosphere. “Humanity and the Earth will soon begin
to suffer some very grim consequences,” he said.
“It’s
therefore an act of suicide on a grand scale to ride so roughshod
over those checks and balances and flout nature’s necessary limits
as blatantly as we do.
“The
longer we go on ignoring what is already happening and denying what
will happen in the future, the more profoundly we condemn our
grandchildren and their children to an unbearably toxic and unstable
existence. We simply have to turn the tide.”
The
Prince has been criticised throughout his life for getting involved
in public affairs, writing to ministers and airing his views on
contentious subjects ranging from architecture to alternative
medicine.
His
most controversial intervention came in 2010 when a £3bn scheme to
redevelop the Chelsea Royal Barracks was dropped after the Prince
lobbied the Prime Minister of Qatar over the sustainability of the
project describing it as a “gigantic experiment with the very soul
of our city”. The Prince said that the lifetime achievement award
was an acknowledgement for what he described as his “rather
inadequate efforts” to create change.
“All
those years ago when I began to see that this could be so, I found
myself labelled with every term that describes a crank,” he said.
“I
don’t actually recommend it as a pastime but, extraordinary as it
may seem, nowadays … that intuitive feeling has been backed up by a
mass of scientific evidence in every possible field confirming that
our predominant approach is having a very adverse effect on nature.”
However
Dr Benny Peiser, director of Lord Lawson’s Global Warming Policy
Foundation, said the Prince’s views were still out of step with
mainstream thinking.
“He
is really a good representative of the environmental movement as such
and it is not a personal issue,” he said. But he added that the
“extreme alarm and extreme concern” was “over the top and not
helpful to the debate”.
“It
doesn’t convince any governments or any ministers and in the end it
is over the top and won’t be heardinShare12
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.