UNEP
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Report Finds Climate Change Goals Growing
More Elusive
23
November, 2012
Global
greenhouse-gas emissions already have passed the point where the
worst effects of global warming could be averted, and they are still
rising, according to the third annual United Nations report on the
so-called emissions gap.
Some
countries have made pledges to help reverse this trend by lowering
their emissions. However, the report by the U.N. Environment
Programme warns that the gap between these pledges and reductions
necessary to cap average global warming at 2 degrees Celsius (3.6
degrees Fahrenheit) by 2020 continues to widen.
"In
addition we have one year less to close it," said Niklas Höhne,
one of the UNEP report's lead authors.
The
report, released shortly before an annual round of climate talks set
to begin on Monday (Nov. 26) in Qatar, seeks to balance a heightened
sense of urgency with a positive message.
"It
is technically feasible and economically feasible that the gap can be
closed," Höhne, director of energy and climate policy at the
independent research and consulting company Ecofys, told LiveScience.
The
math
In
2009, at a meeting in Copenhagen, international negotiators agreed to
the goal of capping global warming at 2 degrees C by 2020. Following
the meeting, some nations submitted pledges to cut their emissions.
The United States, for example, pledged to bring its emissions to
about 17 percent below the 2005 level.
In
the years since, nations have not made any substantial change to
their pledges.
The
UNEP report highlights the gap between these pledges and cuts needed
put the world on a "likely" path to stay below the 2-degree
target. It calculates that the annual emission rate by 2020 should be
no more than 48.5 gigatons (44 metric gigatons) of carbon dioxide
and other greenhouse gases. [8 Ways Global Warming Is Already
Changing the World]
Using
the most recent data available, for 2010, the report puts current
emissions at 54 gigatons (49 metric gigatons). Extrapolate out to
2020, and the gap grows to between 8.8 and 14.3 gigatons (8 and 13
metric gigatons). Last year's report put the gap at between 6.6 and
12.1 gigatons (6 and 11 metric gigatons).
This
year's report attributes the increase to faster-than-expected growth
from 2009 to 2010 after the economic downturn. (More economic
activity creates more greenhouse-gas emissions.) Improved accounting,
taking into account situations in which two countries claim credit
for the same emissions reductions, also contributed, the report
stated.
(A
word about these calculations: While carbon dioxide is the dominant
greenhouse gas, others such as methane, which has potent warming
effect but stays in the atmosphere for only a minuscule period of
time compared with carbon dioxide, also contribute. The UNEP report
lumps greenhouse gases together, describing them in terms of "carbon
dioxide equivalent." Because of the differences among the gases,
not all scientists support this approach.)
Two
sides of a story
Prior
to the UNEP report, the World Bank released its assessment of a
future resulting from no action, in which the average global surface
temperature climbs by 3 degrees C (5.4 degrees F) or more and the
world sees more extreme effects.
As
emissions continue to climb, some climate scientists have said that
an increase of 4 degrees C (7.2 degrees F) is a more likely scenario.
The
World Bank report, called "Turn Down the Heat," describes a
future world of unprecedented heat waves, severe drought and major
floods in many regions. The effects are expected to hit humans hard,
particularly in the poorer parts of the world.
Both
reports attempt to convey a positive message:
"With
action, a 4-degree C world can be avoided, and we can likely hold
warming below 2 degrees C," the authors of the World Bank report
write.
The
UNEP emissions gap report, meanwhile, lists policies that, when
implemented, could help narrow the gap. These include
energy-efficiency standards and labeling for equipment and lighting;
improvements in building codes; transportation infrastructure focused
on mass transit, walking, cycling and waterways; and forestry
policies such as Brazil's increasing protection of areas in the
Amazon and its investment in satellite-based monitoring to prevent
illegal deforestation.
"There
is certainly more action now than ever if you [look] at what is
happening in different countries,” Höhne said.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.