Yoga
teacher brings the “Me Too” movement into the yoga movement on
national radio
Once upon a time (right through the 80's and 90's) I was a practitioner of yoga and for a long time of Iyengar yoga as well as being a teacher. Some years ago I distanced myself from the Iyengar scene for my own particular reasons.
I was disgusted to hear an interview with Christchurch-based American yoga teacher, Donna Farhi on the highly-popular Kim Hill Show on Radio NZ that was touted to bring the "me too" movement into the yoga movement.
I knew Donna quite well personally and know her to be a controlled, disciplined and highly ambitious, if not arrogant woman who is not averse to being very self-promoting (something that can be heard clearly in the interview).
That she should use a public platform like Radio NZ (the NZ equivalent of the BBC) to attack a community that has never in my knowledge ever been tainted by the sort of scandal she refers to (she is talking primarily about an American teacher) while attacking the late BKS Iyengar while promoting herself is nothing less than reprehensible.
One thing that was noticeable was that the things she was talking about go right across the entire yoga community, indeed the entire "New Age" movement. Yet she singles out Iyengar and the Iyengar movement.
However, the brunt of my disgust is directed at Radio New Zealand (and the terrible Kim Hill who is responsible for so much PC social engineering). I have included my letter to them below.
I have seen, in this age of political correctness and malicious finger-pointing just about every person I have looked up to denigrated and attacked because their thought is a rebuke to the fascistic ideology that we are seeing today.
In cases where there has been cases of real sexual abuse this should be addressed.However, much of this is simply an attack on the past where the very baby boomers that were part of the lax standards of that generation are now retrospectively pointing the finger, effectively using an oppressive climate that can only be compared with the McCarthy witch hunts of the 1950's to deny their own shadow and project it onto others who committed acts that were in tune with the mores (or lack of) of the time.
Listen to Kim Hill's interview with Donna Farhi HERE
Here is my letter to Radio NZ:
I
wish to complain strongly about the interview of yoga teacher, Donna
Farhi by Kim Hill.
First
some background. I have, in the past, been a practitioner
of yoga (specifically Iyengar yoga) as well as a teacher and left the
Iyengar scene for my own personal reasons and have not taught for
nearly 20 years. I am aware of the general. Issues Ms.Farhi
raised in the inteview. I have also known Ms Farhi personally and
can attest that she has been saying the same things for about 20
years.
The
interview, in my view, was defamatory (“archaic pedagogy”)
and attacked a whole group of people in THIS country who have NEVER,
to my knowledge ever been implicated in any of the abuse
she is referring to. They, however, will face the brunt of this
attack.
The
issues of abuse, of course, are very real but go right across the
yoga community and indeed the whole “New Age” movement and
need to be addressed although the cases are historical and
relate to another time, to an entire generation of baby boomers whose
moral standards in the 1970’s and 1980’s can only be
referred to as “lax”.
As
an American, Ms Farhi should have addressed these issues in an
American context, rather than on New Zealand media.
I
also found that it was an attack on others while at the
same time being shamelessly self-regarding and self-promoting.
It smacked of collusion in an attack on “the opposition”.
Ms. Farhi is, let’s face it, not a disinterested party.
My
main concern is not the viewpoints being presented (everyone is
entitled to their view) but with the decision of Kim Hill’s
producers and Radio New Zealand to collude with
this.
The
broadcasting standards say quite clearly:
"When
controversial issues of public importance are discussed in news,
current affairs or factual programmes, broadcasters should make
reasonable efforts, or give reasonable opportunities, to present
significant points of view either in the same programme or in
other programmes within the period of current interest."
and
"Broadcasters
should make reasonable efforts to ensure that news, current affairs
and factual programming:
-
is accurate in relation to all material points of fact
-
does not mislead.
Given
that the claims made were of a defamatory nature the VERY LEAST Radio
New Zealand should have done is to have given representatives of
the NZ Iyengar Yoga Association the right to response. The
very airing of highly biased and defamatory comments on
public radio without the right of response is WRONG.
I
shall therefore be making a complaint to the Broadcasting Standards
Authority.
Yours
sincerely etc....
You speak my mind. Thank you.
ReplyDelete