Can I be seeing things?! This is the #1 climate sceptic, the Daily Mail, reporting on something that may prove to be another positive feedback (or a powerful driver of Arctic melting)!
Is
infrared energy melting the Arctic? Mechanism on Earth's surface
could be a major contributor to global warming, study claims
- Infrared energy accounts for half the energy emitted by Earth's surface
- But it's difficult to measure a surface's effectiveness in emitting infrared
- Its influence on planet's climate is not well represented in climate models
- Now scientists claim open oceans are less efficient at emitting infrared
- The discovery could change existing climate models, researchers claim
26
November, 2014
It's
been overlooked for decades, but now scientists believe infrared
energy could turn out to be a major contributor to warming in the
Arctic region.
Infrared
is invisible to human eyes but accounts for about half the energy
emitted by Earth's surface. This process balances out incoming solar
energy.
However,
researchers hadn't previously thought to consider the long-wavelength
region of the electromagnetic spectrum. Now, they believe its
inclusion could change existing climate models.
This simulation shows averaged radiative surface temperature changes during the 2030s after far-infrared surface energy was taken into account. The right colour bar depicts temperature change in Kelvin
Earth's
surface is thought to radiate the equivalent of 17 per cent of
incoming solar energy as thermal infrared.
Despite
its importance in the planet's energy budget, it's difficult to
measure a surface's effectiveness in emitting far-infrared energy
As
a result, its influence on the planet's climate is not well
represented in climate models, which assume that all surfaces are 100
per cent efficient in emitting far-infrared energy.
That's
not the case. The scientists found that open oceans are much less
efficient than sea ice when it comes to emitting in the far-infrared
region of the spectrum.
It's been overlooked for decades, but now scientists believe infrared energy could turn out to be a major contributor to warming in the Arctic region (pictured)
This
means that the Arctic Ocean traps much of the energy in far-infrared
radiation - a previously unknown phenomenon that is likely
contributing to the warming of the polar climate.
'Far-infrared
surface emissivity is an unexplored topic, but it deserves more
attention,' said Daniel Feldman, a scientist in Berkeley Lab's Earth
Sciences Division.
'Our
research found that non-frozen surfaces are poor emitters compared to
frozen surfaces. This discrepancy has a much bigger impact on the
polar climate than today's models indicate.
Professor
Feldman's simulations revealed that far-infrared surface emissions
have the biggest impact on the climates of arid high-latitude and
high-altitude regions.
In
the Arctic, the simulations found that open oceans hold more
far-infrared energy than sea ice, resulting in warmer oceans, melting
sea ice, and a 2°C increase in the polar climate after only a
25-year run.
This
could help explain why polar warming is most pronounced during the
three-month winter when there is no sun.
It
also complements a process in which darker oceans absorb more solar
energy than sea ice.
'The
Earth continues to emit energy in the far infrared during the polar
winter,' Professor Feldman said.
Arctic sea ice hit its annual minimum on 17 September 2014. The red line in this image shows the 1981-2010 average minimum extent. Scientists believe the latest study will require existing climate models to be change
'And
because ocean surfaces trap this energy, the system is warmer
throughout the year as opposed to only when the sun is out.'
The
simulations revealed a similar warming effect on the Tibetan plateau,
where there was five per cent less snowpack after a 25-year run.
This
means more non-frozen surface area to trap far-infrared energy, which
further contributes to warming in the region.
'We
found that in very arid areas, the extent to which the surface emits
far-infrared energy really matters,' said Professor Feldman.
'It
controls the thermal energy budget for the entire region, so we need
to measure and model it better.'
Don't
take the Daily Mail’s word for it! Here it is from a more
reputable source
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.