US
Defense Secretary: Israel to make its ‘own decision’ to attack
Iran
US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel acknowledges that while Israel and the US share a commitment to ensuring Iran does not acquire a nuclear weapon, there "may well be some differences" on the question of when it might decide to go for a bomb.
RT,
21
April, 2013
There
is "no daylight at all" between the US and Israel’s
stances on preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapon, he said.
But there could be a divergence in evaluating the timing of the
threat from Tehran.
Hagel’s
latest visit to Israel has exposed a widely-known secret that the
Obama administration has reasons not to get drawn into a new
conflict.
But
the high status of the major US ally comes with the necessity to
sugarcoat the bitter pill.
Hagel
has arrived in Tel Aviv with two pieces of news: good and bad.
The
good news is he brought a multi-billion-dollar arms package that will
enable Israeli military with Osprey V-22 tilt-rotor transport
aircrafts, air tankers and anti-radar missiles to eliminate enemy air
defenses.
The
supply of the newest American weapons to Israel is designed to show
Tehran that a solution by force of the Iranian nuclear problem
remains on the table.
"I
don't think there's any question that's another very clear signal to
Iran,” Hagel told reporters on Sunday.
Because
Israel has no common border with Iran, it would need to refuel its
bombers and fighter jets to get to the Iranian airspace. Iran also
has deeply embedded air defenses, so taking it out would imply
anti-radar air-to-surface missiles.
The
bad news is that despite Hagel saying the US and Israel regard the
nuclear threat from Iran "exactly the same", there is a
difference between Washington’s and Tel Aviv’s perception of the
timing and necessity to attack.
“When
you back down into the specifics of the timing of when and if Iran
decides to pursue a nuclear weapon, there may well be some
differences,” Hagel said.
On
his first visit to Israel as Pentagon chief, Chuck Hagel delivered a
message from the Obama administration that it is up to Israel to
decide when to make a pre-emptively attack on Persians.
“Israel
will make the decision that Israel must make to protect itself, to
defend itself,” Hagel told reporters ahead of his Middle East
voyage.
Which
might as well mean that in case Israeli military action against Iran
went wrong, direct US military assistance is not guaranteed.
“Iran
is a threat — a real threat,” summed up Hagel, but pointed out
that international economic sanctions have already become a
tremendous pain for Tehran and that in turn would possibly influence
the results of the Iran's presidential election in June. Therefore
the implication of military force remains the last resort option.
It
looks like Washington is paying its way out of a possible new
slaughterhouse to evolve in the Middle East once PM Benjamin
Netanyahu convinces Israeli generals to attack Iran at their own
peril and risk.
The
Israeli PM has been pressing the American authorities to launch an
offensive on Iran for quite some time now – with no practical
results. Possibly the last time Israel could rely on the US in
attacking Iran for real was in 2008, but the war launched by Georgian
President Mikhail Saakashvili in South Ossetia, close to the Iranian
border, spoilt the game – if there was any.
Still,
Hagel assured Tel Aviv that Israel's right of self-defense is not
questioned.
“In
dealing with Iran, every option must be on the table,” Hagel
stressed in the interview given on an overnight flight to the Israeli
capital.
Chuck
Hagel, 66, started his week-long Middle East tour with visiting
Israel for a reason. Not only because Israel is America’s principle
ally in the region, but also because at the defense secretary’s
confirmation hearing in February, the Republicans accused Hagel of
showing insufficient support for the Jewish state.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.