'Missiles
fired at' Russian plane with 159 passengers onboard flying over Syria
Two
missiles were reportedly fired at a Russian plane with at least 159
passengers on board that was flying over Syrian territory. Russian
officials admit the jet faced danger, but are not talking of a
targeted attack.
29
April, 2013
The
news broke in on Monday as Interfax, citing “an informed
source in Moscow,” reported that a Russian passenger plane
was attacked.
“Syrian
[officials] informed us that on Monday morning, unidentified forces
launched two ground-to-air missiles which exploded in the air very
close to a civilian aircraft belonging to a Russian airline,”
the source told the Russian agency.
The
pilots reportedly managed to maneuver the plane in time however,
“saving the lives of passengers.”
It
is believed the aircraft was intentionally targeted, “but it
remains unclear whether the attackers knew it was Russian or not,”
the source added.
However,
Russian officials, though admitting the plane might have been
endangered, are not yet talking of a targeted attack.
The
Russian Foreign Ministry’s said on its website the plane’s crew
at 4.55 PM Moscow time (12.55 GMT) “detected battle action on
the ground that, according to the crew, could constitute a threat to
the 159 passengers on board the plane.”
The
Russian Foreign Ministry is now “taking emergency measures to
clarify all the circumstances of this situation, including making
contact with the Syrian authorities,” the ministry’s
spokesperson Aleksandr Lukashevich said.
The
plane that was allegedly targeted belonged to Nordwind Airlines – a
Russian charter air carrier – and was identified as an Airbus A320.
On April 29 it was en route to the city of Kazan, in Russia’s
republic of Tatarstan, from Egypt's resort city of Sharm el-Sheikh.
So
far, there are no grounds to claim that the aircraft became a target
of a missile attack, experts say.
It
was flying over a mountainous area in Syria when one of the pilots
noticed “flashes on the ground.” After that, to
keep safe, it was decided to increase the height of the flight, Irina
Tyurina, a spokeswoman for Russian Union of Tourist Industry told RIA
Novosti.
“No
one was injured, and the plane was not damaged. The aircraft landed
in Kazan as had been planned,”
the Russian Federal Agency for Tourism told news agencies. There were
159 passengers and eight crew members on-board the aircraft.
Meanwhile,
Syrian aviation authorities received no indication of the alleged
attack on the Russian plane, says the director of Syrian Airlines,
Ghaida Abdullatif:
“We
contacted the service that monitors traffic within Syrian airspace.
None of the air traffic control services or other ground services at
the airports in Damascus and Latakia have confirmed the information
of a Russian plane being fired at".
Russian
experts have already voiced their doubts that a passenger plane can
actually perform the kind of maneuvers that would allow it to avoid a
missile attack.
“Planes
are usually attacked either from the side or from above. A pilot
could not have seen the missiles,”
Vladimir Gerasimov, a Russian pilot and an expert on flight security
told RT. “
A
passenger plane crew simply couldn’t see what’s behind. And if
something is approaching the plane from the opposite direction –
the speed doubles, so there is no time to do anything, ”
he added.
Danny
Makki of the Syrian Youth Movement in the UK believes that the
incident is no doubt a rebel attack, which could have been carried
out with weapons supplied by neighboring governments or taken off the
Syrian army. He thinks that the attack is an intentional one and
should receive widespread condemnation, just as the attacks carried
out by government forces do.
“The most likely thing that could have happened was rebel fire from missiles that could have been given by regional countries or government forces… no rebel forces would fire a missile at civilian aircraft without it being done intentionally. So it is essentially another reprehensible act that would have been committed by rebel forces, and should gain condemnation from all the states after it is clearer who actually committed it”, Makki said,
“But it does show that these are not the liberal forces which the West wanted to arm in the first place”, he added.
“The most likely thing that could have happened was rebel fire from missiles that could have been given by regional countries or government forces… no rebel forces would fire a missile at civilian aircraft without it being done intentionally. So it is essentially another reprehensible act that would have been committed by rebel forces, and should gain condemnation from all the states after it is clearer who actually committed it”, Makki said,
“But it does show that these are not the liberal forces which the West wanted to arm in the first place”, he added.
The
civil war in Syria between the government of President Bashar Assad
and opposition forces has been raging for over two years, claiming
the lives of more than 70,000 people according to UN estimates. Assad
says he is fighting an insurgency that has been sponsored from
abroad.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.