Why
Occupy's plan to cancel consumer debts is money well spent
Occupy's
Rolling Jubilee idea transcends politics and will be difficult for
lenders to oppose
Charles
Eisenstein
12
November, 2012
A
new initiative is re-energising the Occupy movement. Called the
Rolling Jubilee, it is a plan to use money from donations to buy
distressed consumer debt from lenders at a marked down price, just as
debt collection agencies normally would. But instead of hounding
debtors for payments, it will simply cancel the debts. The hope is
that the liberated debtors will themselves contribute to the fund,
"rolling" the jubilee forward.
The
Rolling Jubilee is a genius move for several reasons. First, debt
relief is a transpartisan message that eludes conventional political
categorisation. As such, it returns Occupy to its origins as an
advocate for the wellbeing of ordinary people, neither leftwing nor
rightwing. The Rolling Jubilee says, non-threateningly, "We just
want to help people in this unfair system."
But
despite its non-threatening appearance, the Rolling Jubilee has
significant transformative potential. Two pillars uphold the present
debt regime: the moral legitimacy of debt in society's eyes, ie, the
idea that a person "should" pay back what he owes; and the
coercive mechanisms that enforce repayment, such as harassment,
seizure of assets, garnishment of wages, denial of employment or
housing, and even imprisonment. The Rolling Jubilee erodes both. It
destigmatises debt by saying, "we're all in this together, we
believe your situation is unfair, not shameful, so we're going to
help you out". And it lessens the severity of the consequences
of default. If defaulting means you might get bailed out, why keep
paying?
For
this reason, we might expect lenders to balk at co-operating with the
Rolling Jubilee, perhaps by refusing to sell loans to anyone who
doesn't agree to seek collection. So here is a third reason why the
idea is so brilliant: if the lenders block debt cancellation even
when it comes at no cost to themselves (as they would have sold it at
the same price to a collection agency), they appear as a bunch of
greedy, vindictive Scrooges. Given their current vulnerability, banks
might not want to incite hostility by preventing people from helping
each other out.
Accordingly,
it is important that the Jubilee organisers continue to frame it in
precisely that way: people helping each other out of hardship. Yes,
they might understand that its political significance runs deeper,
but if they portray it as a political ploy then it will be met as
such by the banks or other authorities. Public opinion might also not
be as sympathetic.
This
also goes for the way the organisers portray it to themselves. In a
political system that is lost in a maelstrom of hype, spin and
messaging, we crave authenticity in others and in ourselves. Let the
Rolling Jubilee stay grounded in the simple goal of freeing people
from debt. The political effect will be greater, not less, when it
comes from a place of sincerity.
The
Rolling Jubilee could influence economic policy as a model for a very
different kind of bailout in response to the next financial crisis.
The problem of unpayable debts bedevils every corner of our financial
system – public, corporate, and personal. So far, the response of
the monetary and fiscal authorities to nearly every financial crisis
has been to bail out the creditors but not the debtors. Governments
and central banks purchase all kinds of shoddy loans from the private
sector, but rather than reduce interest or principal on those loans,
they merely become the new creditor. The underwater homeowner, the
indebted university graduate, the laid-off worker juggling credit
cards ... they get no relief at all.
The
Rolling Jubilee brings a different kind of solution into the public
consciousness. The next time a systemic crisis breaks, central banks
can rescue the banking system by once again buying the delinquent
loans – and then cancel them or reduce the amount borrowers owe.
Central banks, with their unlimited capacity to print money, have the
power to do this at no cost to the taxpayer. The result would be a
release of pent-up consumer purchasing power that had been stuck in
debt service. Rising demand would fuel employment, wages, and a
broad-based economic expansion.
Would
this solution be inflationary? Yes. But a little inflation isn't
necessarily a bad thing, as long as wages rise as fast as prices.
Then it is an equalizer of wealth, as the relative value of hoarded
wealth shrinks.
Debt
cancellation, whether a "people's bailout" or government
policy, is only part of the solution to our economic woes. Deep
systemic reforms are necessary, especially given the reality that we
are operating a growth-dependent system on a finite planet. But right
now, debt is the issue staring us in the face. As always, the most
innovative solutions rise from the margins. The Rolling Jubilee may
be showing us a glimpse of what is to come.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.