Hurricane Sandy – lessons from Down-Under
by
Seemorerocks
After
the earthquake in Christchurch, New Zealand it was clear to me from the outset
that there would be no meaningful reconstruction of the
quake-stricken city in the context of the collapse of human and
industrial society.
I
had to be careful back then who I said this to; it even evinced a
strong and emotional denial from at least one person in the Lifeboat
movement based in Canterbury.
However,
two years later my 'way-out' comments have been vindIcated.
Every time I listen to the radio and anyone resident in Christchurch
is able to say what they feel, they express the exhaustion and rage of
a person living in a city where they are (after two years) still
having to live (every day) with the consequences of the earthquake.
Many
people still haven't sorted out insurance cases and are in the midst
of a Kafkaesque situation of getting no answers (let alone solutions)
from the government, earthquake recovery authority or insurance
companies. Many, despite not necessarily being poverty-stricken, are
still living in temporary accommodation.
Despite
this, we are regularly fed rhetoric from government and media about the
'Christchurch rebuild' and the supposed 'benefits' to the New Zealand
economy.
'Reconstruction'
does not mean that people in the devastated eastern suburbs get
rehomed – rather, it means that Christchurch is promised a new (and
expensive) convention centre and a covered stadium that the people
and, by-and-large the local city council, do not want – but is
being forced on them by a central government that has imposed dictatorial
powers.
In
addition, the exhausted people of Christchurch are struggling to stop
having their schools closed as part of a right-wing 'shock doctrine'
government programme to privatize education and introduce charter
schools.
The
people of Christchurch would also like to have their democracy back
-
the regional council was sacked by a government Order in Council and replaced by government-appointed commissioners to deliver the results that the government wants - mostly in the area of water rights.
the regional council was sacked by a government Order in Council and replaced by government-appointed commissioners to deliver the results that the government wants - mostly in the area of water rights.
Essentially,
Christchurch is part of a government-led social experiment.
I
hear from a friend in Japan that only
token reconstruction
is happening. He revealed that 25% of funds earmarked for recovery are being spent on unrelated projects.
When
we hear about the opportunities of disaster for stimulating
the economy
as a result of the disaster I have to laugh.
It is, as my friend in Japan says, just 'Keynsian crap'.
It is, as my friend in Japan says, just 'Keynsian crap'.
You
just have to ask the people of Christchurch or Japan (and try the
people of Haiti!) about how disasters have stimulated their economies.
So in covering the events in the eastern United States, I feel great
compassion. There are others who have gone through this before.
When
I hear people being interviewed, I
hear exhaustion and grief in community leaders' voices as they
describe the devastation - also a certain half-heartedness in the
promise to rebuild It is as if the head tells them what the heart
cannot believe.
Take,
for example this interview with New York Governor Cuomo, who says of the subway
station they stand in - "this is a reconstruction", and talks
of "a new reality"
I am sure that when many people in Christchurch hear in the media that well-heeled New Yorkers are insured, it just evokes an empty laugh.
They
know
what
the reality of living post-catastrophe is.
I am sure this won't be a popular topic....but dragging the populace kicking and screaming into reality rarely is.
ReplyDeleteWell written and I know... i totally agree.
Reality is rarely comfortable!
ReplyDelete