The
recent truce between Israel and Hamas has already been violated by
both sides, but may hold regardless unless Israel responds to
provocations from groups not affiliated with Hamas, John Glaser from
Antiwar.com told RT.
RT,
22
November, 2012
RT: Cheering
and chanting have been heard in the streets of Gaza, celebrating the
truce. But how long do you expect the agreement to last?
John
Glaser: It
is an unanswerable question. A truce like this one has been entered
by Israel and Hamas before, only to have the fundamentals of the
situation stay the same, and eventually somebody breaks this
ceasefire – typically, that's Israel. That is what happened in
2008-2009, which led to the Cast Lead operations. There were no Hamas
rockets prior to that invasion and that escalation of airstrikes.
Israel broke that ceasefire, and it was a much worse war than this
time around. Thankfully, they reached a ceasefire deal before things
got as bad as they did in Cast Lead. We have to see how well it
holds, but if the fundamentals stay the same – that is to say that
the blockade still remains in place, if Gazans are continued to be
targeted by Israel through overhead strikes or through artillery
through the borders, we're still going to see tit for tat exchanges
of fire and possibly another outbreak of war.
RT: Hamas
claims it's their victory, saying Israel "has failed in all its
goals" – but with more than160 civilians killed in Gaza
and widespread destruction throughout the territory, just how much of
a victory is it really?
JG: Well,
it is typical for people that are in power in a certain territory to
brag about this or that thing and try to assign victory to this and
that event, and Hamas is doing that. But it is not much of a victory.
Gaza was virtually destroyed prior to this outbreak of violence over
the past week. Cement and metal and construction materials have been
blocked from entering since Cast Lead ended in January 2009, and much
more of the residential areas and the government infrastructure has
been ruined in this latest conflict. And you're right – the ratio
of death and injury is not in the Palestinians' favor. So while it's
typical for people to claim victory, I think we need to try and think
soberly about this. It was not a happy time nor was this ceasefire
for Gazans.
RT: According
to Israeli officials, around 12 rockets have been fired from across
the border since the ceasefire came into force. Is this really a
truce, then?
JG: The
reports that I've seen at the latest point possible, right before
this interview, CNN confirmed that five rockets from Gaza into Israel
were fired after the ceasefire – that is unfortunate, that ought to
stop. It is possible that these smaller militant groups that are not
Hamas are doing this, and doing it without the permission from Hamas,
as typically happens – but it is also true that Israel has been
flying drones over Gazan territory; it was contingent within the
truce deal, the ceasefire deal, that overhead flights would end. So,
this might take time to die down a little bit. It does not appear
that Israel is responding to those five rockets, so overall the
ceasefire is holding.
RT: Iran
has recently confirmed that it has been supplying Hamas with the
technology to construct long-range missiles. What kind of reaction
can we expect from Israel to this?
JG: Israel
has sort of lost the diplomatic and political battle to have the US
back a war against Iran. The primary reason they had for that is the
non-existent nuclear weapons program, which they persistently harp
on. This might be another pretext, but the sort of diplomatic ducks
are not in a row for Israel to start complaining about a war against
Iran again. But we will have to see about that.
RT: The
Israeli-Gaza war just four years ago, but didn't cripple Hamas in the
long-term. Has this offensive proved to be any different?
JG: No,
typically overly harsh measures which are severely disproportionate –
like the economic blockade and bombing Gaza from the sky – those
typically work to strengthen the radical elements of the Palestinian
resistance. This has been stated again and again by, for example UN
chief Ban Ki-Moon. The more crafty Israeli leaders should recognize
that wars like this and tit for tat conflicts, and imposing harsh
economic warfare, typically bolsters Hamas as opposed to weakening
them.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.