East Coast may face new nor'easter while recovering from Superstorm Sandy
Another
messy - and wintry - storm may cause post-Election Day problems for
an already weather-weary East Coast, forecasters say.
3
November, 2012
But
meteorologists add that it's six days out, so that's rather early to
get too worried. The forecast could change before it hits late next
week.
The
National Weather Service's forecast center in College Park, Md.,
which watches winter storms, put out a long-range notice Thursday
saying a nor'easter was possible for mid-Atlantic and New England
states by Election Day through next Thursday.
Forecaster
Bruce Sullivan said it wouldn't be as bad as Superstorm Sandy and
isn't tropical. But it could include snow in interior New England and
New York, beach erosion and high winds for areas hit by Sandy and
moderate or heavier rainfall. Winds could be about 30 to 40 mph.
"I
wouldn't get too alarmed yet," Sullivan said. "But it's
something we're going to be watching over the next few days and
fine-tuning. Anything that could hamper clean-up efforts is something
that could be watched."
Meanwhile,
widespread power outages and subway shutdowns may wind up making
Sandy the second most expensive storm in U.S. history, according to
the forecasting firm Eqecat. That would rank it right behind
Hurricane Katrina.
In
16 states and Washington, D.C., 52,000 homeowners have filed
insurance claims, including nearly 10,000 in New Jersey, CBS News
reports.
The
same European computer model that first noticed and correctly called
Sandy a week in advance has forecast this potential nor'easter to
come along the East Coast and then hit, Sullivan said. Another
computer model also said the same thing, but then lessened that
chance, he said.
Unlike
Sandy, this doesn't have a tropical component. This would be a normal
wet storm coming through land in the Southeast U.S. and going into
the water, combining with cold air coming south from the Great Lakes
and then curving back into the mid-Atlantic, Sullivan said.
The
same high pressure system that blocked then-Hurricane Sandy from
heading north and east out to sea like most tropical systems is
likely to be part of the steering system that would take this storm
inland to the same area Sandy struck, said Jeff Masters, meteorology
director for the private service Weather Underground.
The
fact that it's six days out means "there's room for optimism,"
Masters said, but he added: "From what I'm Iooking at, there's a
concern."
Eqecat
said Thursday that the damage from Sandy will likely be far worse
than it previously predicted, largely a result of the storm hitting
the most densely populated area in the country.
The
firm doubled its previous estimate for the total bill and now says
Sandy may have caused between $30 billion and $50 billion in economic
losses, including property damage, lost business and extra living
expenses. The cost to insurance companies could run as low as $10
billion and as high as $20 billion.
The
new numbers square with an earlier estimate from IHS Global Insight.
IHS said Sandy could cause about $20 billion in property damages and
between $10 billion and $30 billion in lost business.
The
firm pointed to two reasons that Sandy will leave a bigger bill than
it first thought. Power outages are more widespread than in a typical
Category 1 storm, Eqecat said. Sandy knocked out electricity for more
homes and businesses than any other storm in history, according to
the Department of Energy.
The
lack of subway service in New York City and blocked roadways will
also push the total cost higher, Eqecat said.
Before
the storm hit, Eqecat had estimated that total economic losses from
Sandy could range as high as $20 billion and that losses to insurance
companies could reach $10 billion. Payouts for insurance claims are
typically a fraction of the overall cost to the economy.
If
the damages hit $50 billion, it would make Sandy the second-costliest
U.S. storm after Katrina in 2005. Katrina's overall costs were $108
billion. Taking inflation into account, that works out to $128
billion today.
Even
after adjusting for inflation, the high end of Eqecat's damage
estimates for Sandy would be higher than those caused by previous
major storms. Andrew, which struck in 1992, cost $44 billion in
today's dollars, and the Ike storm of 2008 cost $32 billion.
Another
major firm that calculates the cost of catastrophes, RMS, is
gathering information before it makes its first estimate. RMS said
Thursday that it has two reconnaissance teams out surveying the
damage. The firm has offices in Hoboken, N.J., where floodwaters
stranded thousands of people.
Eqecat's
estimates only cover private losses, not costs covered by the
government through the National Flood Insurance Program administered
by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Max Mayfield, the
hurricane center director during Katrina, said the costs to FEMA can
be $2 to $2.50 for every dollar of losses covered by private
insurance.
After
Hurricane Sandy: DANGER - Natural Gas Leaks, Homes Might Explode
I have to agree with everything in this post. Thanks for the useful information.fuel injector cleaner
ReplyDeleteLevels of debt are higher within London than anywhere else in the country. debt advice london
ReplyDelete