Posts
US military planned mutiny on the Bounty to topple Obama
The
Obama administration has had American military, both on domestic and
foreign bases on high alert since October 1. However, there has been
no known terrorist enemy threatening the US. The enemy is called
“domestic” but its origins are far from American.
Gordon Duff, Veterans Today
29
October, 2012
Today,
Rear Admiral Charles M. Gaouette was “fired” from his command of
one of the three carrier battle groups back to Bremerton, Washington
to face an investigation.
It
is impossible to adequately state how unusual this is and how
serious.
The
Navy was clear that the charges had nothing to do with his personal
conduct, no rape or sexual misconduct, no stolen money, no drug use,
the things that usually bring down careers in the Navy, that and
crashing ships into each other.
Gaouette
was sent back because the Secretary of Defense found him unfit for
command, sent him across the world in the middle of one of the
largest combat exercises in history, one both timed prior to an
election and one at a critical location, near the Straits of Hormuz
in the Persian Gulf.
Gaouette
commanded nearly one third of the Naval and air combat forces in the
region.
The
decision was made based on a conversation with the Secretary of
Defense who, at the end of the talk, believed Gaouette was part of a
group of military officers who have been under suspicion for planning
a “Seven Days in May” type overthrow of the US government if
President Obama is re-elected.
This
is not conjecture, dozens of key officers face firing, hundreds are
under investigation, all with direct ties to extremist elements in
the Republican Party and the Israeli lobby.
Reports
received are sourced at the highest levels of the Pentagon and
indicate that the administration has been aware of these plans for
months.
It
is not just the Obama administration. This happened before.
The
Air Force moved against the Bush administration in 2007 when it
loaded up to nine nuclear weapons on a B 52 aircraft at Minot Air
Force Base. We know now that up to three of those nuclear weapons are
listed as “missing,” the military expression for this is “Broken
Arrow.”
From
Veterans Today:
Minot-Barksdale,
The forgotten mutiny
In
August 2007, at least six nuclear warheads were stolen from Minot Air
Force Base in North Dakota. The moment they were loaded, they
disappeared from America’s nuclear inventory, “location unknown,”
something that is not supposed to happen. There is no possible
“misinterpretation” of orders, no mistake, no “wrong label”
issue. These weapons were stolen, pure and simple. Discussions of
individual commanders having authority to deploy weapons, stories of
accidents, confusion or political alignments within the Air Force are
“red herrings.”
Nothing is more
controlled, more secure, more restricted, more classified, more
protected than the nuclear arsenal of the United States. However, on
that fateful day in 2007, a half dozen or more, hydrogen bombs, were
plucked out of a secure bunker with no paperwork, no orders, nothing.
This
is the military. People are jailed for losing flashlight batteries.
They
were loaded into the weapons bay of a B-52 long-range bomber for
transport to places unknown, for purposes unknown. The plane had no
orders, was part of no mission, operated under no legal command
structure, in fact, the moment the weapons were loaded, was no longer
an American plane at all. A mission, even under the most innocent
possible circumstances, that would have required the knowledge of the
President and his staff, certainly the Joint Chiefs of Staff and
likely the National Security Council as well, seem to have authorized
itself, out of “thin air.”
Though
the plane later landed at Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana,
there is no evidence supporting this as the intended destination, far
from it.
The
theft, hijacking, you pick the term, these are the best two so far,
happened outside the command authority of the United States
government, contravening all protocols for the storage, handling and
deployment of nuclear weapons. The incident was also a violation of
treaties requiring America to safeguard her stockpile of nuclear
weapons, not just from environmental disasters but also, as with this
incident, from a mutiny by members of the military and civilian
branches of our government, acting outside authority, acting as
civilians, an act of piracy, mutiny, an act of insurrection.
Today’s
“relief of command” is a response to a similar threat.
The
“Barksdale Nukes” were believed to be heading to Diego Garcia for
use against Iran as part of a false flag war, one started by a naval
admiral who was tasked by an extra-governmental agenda to start a
war.
This
was the Air Force part of a joint operation that is said to have
involved 5th Fleet commander, Admiral Cosgriff who as reported to the
Secretary of State by Gwyneth Todd, then Chief Political Advisor to
the fleet. Todd, who has recently retold her story to the Washington
Post and other media outlets, received a death threat this morning
after a stalking incident against her by an FBI agent stationed at
the US embassy in Canberra, Australia.
Similarly,
top defense consultant John Wheeler III, who knew of these issues
quite well was mysteriously murdered and his body found in a garbage
heap in Delaware in late 2010. No suspects have been arrested; no
real investigation has ever been made.
That
was then.
Today,
key members of the military more loyal to Israel and Wall Street than
the United States are said to be planning a mutiny to take place
after the presidential election.
Their
task, upon seizing power, is to facilitate a massive terror attack
inside the United States, possibly using a stolen nuclear weapon,
declare martial law, move troops into Iraq and to attack Iran with
aid from Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States.
Turkey
is to attack Syria with aid from Israel and civil war between the
Kurdish regional government and the national government in Baghdad is
to begin with the US brokering a peace and re-establishing what
“newly appointed President Romney” would describe as the “Status
of Forces Agreement” he mentioned during the debates.
His
real intent is to occupy Iraq and attack Iran. In the process,
America intends on “neutralizing” the nuclear capability of
Pakistan.
This
is the plan, it is known, not just in the Department of Defense, but
by all intelligence agencies, the plotters have all been recognized,
are all under surveillance and they have not been very careful.
All
information here has more than one official source.
Step
one, Benghazi
Those
involved in the plot, those outside the military, are those who are
spreading “conspiracy theory” rumors about US complicity or
malfeasance in the handling of the murder of the US ambassador to
Libya, Chris Stephens.
Today,
CIA Director, General Petraeus clearly stated that the CIA had
received no requests for help. A month ago, the State Department also
made it clear, the attack was military, well coordinated and that no
forces were available capable of making a difference.
In
fact, the “conspiracy theorists,” those attempting to use their
wild theories in order to implement an “October Surprise” are
directly aligned with those who planned and executed the attack.
This
is one of the advantages of a “false flag” attack on an American
diplomat by America’s own friends and allies, or those mistaken for
being such, any attempt to characterize those known to be guilty,
prior to an election, would be used to discredit anyone giving out
actual accurate information.
This
is the role of the controlled press in terror operations, providing
“deception and cover.”
Thus,
it was necessary to invent a non-existent “Al Qaeda cell” in
Libya and to hunt down minor third party assets while the real
killers, well trained special operations military from the Gulf
States and “other nations” were able to escape and will remain
unaccountable.
Security
services of both Britain and France had reported the presence of a
special operations team well in advance of 9/11 but the target was a
mystery.
The
Benghazi attack required incredible coordination. What debunks
conspiracy theories is that even the most amateur attacks use radio
frequency jammers. They are common even to the Taliban much less to
groups this sophisticated, a force now said to number at least 120
with 50 or more being trained special operations forces.
This
backs up General Petraeus’ statement that no messages were
received.
One
incredible inconsistency in the “conspiracy media” came from Fox
News. They reported that the US compound in Benghazi was relieved by
a large force of friendly militia at 3am, a full hour before the
lethal mortar attack is said, by Fox News, to have begun. Jennifer
Griffin wrote this exclusive account for Fox News:
“They
were killed by a mortar shell at 4 a.m. Libyan time, nearly seven
hours after the attack on the consulate began - a window that
represented more than enough time for the U.S. military to send
back-up from nearby bases in Europe, according to sources familiar
with Special Operations. Four mortars were fired at the annex. The
first one struck outside the annex. Three more hit the annex.
A
motorcade of dozens of Libyan vehicles, some mounted with 50 caliber
machine guns, belonging to the February 17th Brigades, a Libyan
militia which is friendly to the U.S., finally showed up at the CIA
annex at approximately 3 a.m.”
Fox
was so busy gloating over their misdirection that they totally missed
how thoroughly they discredited themselves. Nothing written in any of
the recent versions remotely depicts eyewitness reports. They made
the whole thing up.
All
of those who report a “hodge-podge” of conflicting calls for help
through jammed communications, reminiscent of the jamming during the
attack on the USS Liberty, are now potential suspects in the planning
and execution of the attack itself.
Additionally,
there is little possibility the attack in Benghazi could have been
carried out without the presence of foreign agents within the State
Department and the well-timed distraction of the Terry Jones telethon
financed and supported by the CATO Institute and Republican National
Committee, of which I am, sadly, a longtime member.
Israel
rule
The planned
overthrow and subsequent declaration of martial law is a massively
financed operation with billions of dollars available. The primary
impetus for this action is a belief by members of the
“dispensationalist” pseudo-Christian heresy that pervades
America’s military service academies that the United States should
be subservient to the State of Israel.
Over
the past three decades, religious extremists have taken over the Air
Force Academy, Annapolis and West Point, teaching mandatory classes
in obscure religious beliefs, hatred of Islam and stressing obedience
to an “Apocalypse Cult” that stresses pre-emptive nuclear war in
order to bring on the “end times” and destroy all life on earth.
Some
find these beliefs inconsistent with oaths sworn by all members of
the military:
“I,
_____, having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United
States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear
(or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the
United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will
bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this
obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of
evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of
the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God." (DA
Form 71, 1 August 1959, for officers.)”
Oaths,
so easy to take, so convenient to break, and so it goes…
Gordon
Duff is a Marine Vietnam veteran, a combat infantryman, and
Senior Editor at Veterans Today. His career has included extensive
experience in international banking along with such diverse areas as
consulting on counter insurgency, defense technologies or acting as
diplomatic representative for UN humanitarian and economic
development efforts. Gordon Duff has traveled to over 80 nations. His
articles are published around the world and translated into a number
of languages. He is regularly on TV and radio, a popular and
sometimes controversial guest
No independent verification but the Washington MPs flew
to the ship, relieved the Admiral of command, and flew him
away with no explanation....
to the ship, relieved the Admiral of command, and flew him
away with no explanation....
1-star firing a public rebuke for decorated CO
The
Navy fired the one-star commander of a carrier strike group
patrolling the Arabian Sea on Oct. 27, a highly unusual removal that
occurred amid an investigation of his leadership by the naval
inspector general.
Rear
Adm. Chuck Gaouette, head of the John C. Stennis Carrier Strike
Group, was flown back to the U.S. amid this probe, said to be looking
into reports that he exhibited “inappropriate leadership judgment,”
according to a Navy official familiar with the case. A one-star
former strike group commander is en route to assume command
http://www.navytimes.com/news/2012/11/navy-1-star-firing-stennis-strike-group-public-rebuke-110412
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.