"If all else fails go to war" - Gerald Celente
Iran
strike must be bigger than Afghan/Iraqi ops combined - report
Only
a US operation bigger than the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan
combined can stop Iran from its alleged pursuit of a nuclear bomb, a
new military report said. Such action, however, risks igniting
all-out war in the Middle East.
13
September, 2012
Amid
escalating rhetoric from Israel and the US over military action
against Iran, more than 30 former US diplomats, retired admirals and
generals have assembled a report on the consequences of military
action against Tehran. The study will be released on Thursday.
The
AP received an advance copy of the document, set to be released on
Thursday, and reported that the analysis assessed the risks of a
possible invasion of Iran, but provided no overall conclusion or
recommended course of action.
Retired
Army Lt. Gen. Frank Kearney, who endorsed the report, claimed that it
was intended to “stimulate thinking in the US about the objectives
of a military attack on Iran beyond the obvious goal of hitting key
components of Iran's nuclear program.”
The
report said that a US military attack would harm the current regime’s
political standing and damage its ability to launch counterattacks,
but Tehran would almost certainly retaliate, “directly and through
surrogates, in ways that risked igniting all-out war in the Middle
East.”
US
strikes could destroy Iran's most important nuclear facilities and
damage its military forces but would only delay – not fully stop –
the Islamic republic's alleged pursuit of a nuclear weapon.
"Clearly
there is some [US] ability to do destruction, which will cause some
delay, but what occurs after that?" Kearney said. “You can't
kill intellectual power."
In
assessing the costs and benefits of a possible strike, the review
said that Iran could be stopped only by a military invasion and
occupation “more taxing than the Iraq and Afghanistan wars
combined.”
"Given
Iran's large size and population, and the strength of Iranian
nationalism, we estimate that the occupation of Iran would require a
commitment of resources and personnel greater than what the US has
expended over the past 10 years in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars
combined," the report said.
In
the wake of recent anti-US protests across the Middle East, including
violent clashes in Egypt and Yemen, the document also warned that
such a strike “would add to a perception of the US as anti-Muslim –
a perception linked to the US-led invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan
and hardened by Internet-based video excerpts of an anti-Muslim film
that may have fueled Tuesday's deadly attack on a US diplomatic
office in Libya.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.