10
September, 2012
Economics
101 says a massive dose of easy money is supposed to be a reliable
cure for a sluggish economy. For the first time in decades, the
prescription isn’t working, to the rising frustration of central
bankers in the U.S. and Europe.
Four
years and more than $2 trillion after the Federal Reserve opened the
money spigots following the financial collapse of 2008, the U.S.
economy remains stuck in the mud.
Fed
Chairman Ben Bernanke, in a widely-watched speech last month in
Jackson Hole, Wyo., defended the central bank’s past decisions to
churn out record-breaking volumes of cash -- a process known as
“quantitative easing” -- saying the policy had prevented a much
more painful recession. Bernanke also left little doubt that more
money may be coming, as early as this week’s regular Fed policy
meeting.
"It
is important to achieve further progress, particularly in the labor
market," Bernanke said. "The Federal Reserve will provide
additional policy accommodation as needed."
Maintaining
steady job growth is half of the Fed’s so-called “dual mandate,”
the other being inflation control. Based on Friday's monthly jobs
report, showing fewer than 100,000 new hires in August, the Fed has a
lot more work to do.
All
of which has Wall Street convinced it’s a pretty sure bet that the
Fed is about to fire up its money machine once more, forcing cash
into the system by buying hundreds of trillions of dollars’ worth
of bonds.
“That
employment report kind of nailed it,” said Michelle Girard, RBS
senior economist. “The Fed laid out the criteria: we need to see a
sustained and substantial improvement. And that labor report didn’t
show it. So the Fed is going to have to make good on their
intentions.”
But
roads paved with good intentions don’t always lead to good places.
Though investors have bid up stocks on the theory that another
massive wave of cash has to go somewhere, there’s widening doubt
that another money flood will boost growth or create more jobs.
“What
central banks everywhere are doing is trying to make sure people are
not focused on the world breaking apart,” said Dinakar Singh, CEO
of TPG-Axon Capital. “Ultimately I don't think lower rates make
that much difference anymore. There aren't that many people left that
haven't borrowed money -- companies or people -- but would if rates
were lower. “
On
top of another massive money drop, the Fed may extend its stated
promise to keep interest rates ultra-low further into the future.
Some market watchers, and a few Fed policy makers, have expressed
concerns those moves could do more harm than good.
Even
as low rates have failed to spur growth, they’re penalizing savers.
Insurance and pension funds have been hit hard by record low returns
needed to fund long-term obligations. And, at some point, the Fed
will have to start selling its massive holdings in bonds, forcing
rates higher and producing a drag on growth.
Discussions about that "exit strategy," frequent following the Fed's first round of bond-buying, have all but disappeared from recent Fed deliberations.
Discussions about that "exit strategy," frequent following the Fed's first round of bond-buying, have all but disappeared from recent Fed deliberations.
Europe’s
central bank, meanwhile, is also embarking on its second round of
bond buying to try to head off a deepening recession. But the ECB's
easy money efforts appear to have had even less impact on the
eurozone crisis than its American counterpart.
Central
bankers there face a different, and thornier, set of problems. So
far, they’ve been badly hampered by restrictions on their mandate
preventing them from intervening to help bail out specific countries
in trouble.
They’ve
also been hamstrung by politics, as wealthier northern nations led by
Germany have opposed the kind of big-money stimulus pioneered by the
Fed.
Further
action could be hampered by a German high court ruling expected this
week on the constitutionality of a key bailout fund. No matter which
way the court rules, central bankers in Germany’s Bundesbank --
along with millions of that country’s voters -- will likely oppose
further ECB proposals to flood the continent with money, much of it
coming from Germany.
“The
Bundesbank is now becoming the voice increasingly of conservative
Germany,” said Jim O'Neill, chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset
Management. “It’s the early stages of heading toward what
ultimately will be some referendum in Germany on a closer euro in
which Germany, as part of its DNA has to support the others.”
ECB
intervention to drive down interest rates could worsen the crisis by
protecting free-spending governments from the financial market
punishment needed to enforce tighter budget controls.
“Its
massive support may well discourage profligate governments from
meeting their fiscal objectives,” said David Rosenberg, chief
economist at Gluskin Shiff. ”Italy is already backsliding on this
front.”
But
the measures are much more limited than the massive stimulus
undertaken following the 2008 collapse. That spending spree left
China with more roads, bridges, airports and rail lines than it
needs. Now, as growth has slowed again, inventories of raw materials
and finished goods are piling up.
Additional
government lending and spending risks igniting another round of the
kind of consumer inflation that swept through China in 2010, forcing
up food prices and inflating a rapidly expanding real estate bubble.
Chinese
consumer price inflation appears to be moving higher again, bumping
up to annual rate of 2.0 percent last month from 1.8 percent in July,
and is likely to rise above 3 percent early next year, according to
Mark Williams, chief Asia economist at Capital Insight.
“This
won’t prevent further stimulus if the economy remains very weak,
but it does make large policy moves less likely,” he said.
Faced
with an ongoing global slowdown, though, central bankers around the
world are loathe to do nothing. Despite the limited impact of
dumping more money into the economy, even easy-money skeptics at the
Fed will likely go along with another round, according to Neal Soss
CSFB chief economist.
“Even
those who doubt the efficacy of monetary policy under current
circumstances may well feel obliged not to disappoint financial
markets,” he said.
“First, do no harm.“
“First, do no harm.“
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.