Netanyahu
exploded over US hesitancy towards Iran – Republican congressman
The
rift between the US and Israel over Iran now seems more like a chasm,
as a senior US politician confirmed that he witnessed an
“unprecedented” row between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and
America's ambassador to Israel.
RT,
7
September, 2012
Although
previously denied by both sides, the heated argument was recounted in
a radio interview by Republican congressman Mike Rogers, who is the
Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee- and was present at a
bilateral meeting in Israel on August 24.
The
discussion centred on ways to curb Iran’s nuclear ambitions, whom
both countries believe is trying to develop a nuclear weapon. Amidst
the talks Netanyahu is said to have suddenly lost his temper with US
ambassador, Dan Shapiro.
"We've
had sharp exchanges with other heads of state and in intelligence
services," Rogers said, "but nothing at that level that
I've seen in all my time, where people were clearly that agitated,
clearly that worked up about a particular issue where there was a
very sharp exchange."
Rogers
says Netanyahu chastised Obama’s administration for failing to draw
“a red line”, a clear indication of what Tehran would have to do
before the US took action to stop Iran’s atomic development, and
that this ambiguity is making it difficult for Israel to decide on
its own strategy.
Shapiro
paraphrased the Prime Minister’s argument: “This Administration's
been saying, you've gotta wait, you've gotta wait, you've gotta wait…
but then you've gotta tell us when is the red line, so we can make
our own decisions about should we or shouldn't we stop this
particular program."
In
turn, Shapiro, who is considered Obama’s close policy adviser and
not just a symbolic figure, broke diplomatic protocol, forcefully
telling Netanyahu that the administration is determined to combat
Iran, even if it takes an air strike on its nuclear facilities, a
step that has been discussed by both sides for months.
But
Rogers recalls that Netanyahu was not convinced, and believes that
Iran could manufacture a working nuclear weapon in 4 to 8 weeks.
"Right
now the Israelis don't believe that the Administration is serious
when they say that all options are on the table, and more importantly
neither do the Iranians. That's why the program is progressing,"
summed up Rogers.
"At
this point they're very frustrated because they don't' know what
happens after the election and their window for impacting the program
they believe is starting to close."
Reports
of the tumultuous meeting first surfaced last week in the Israeli
press, only to be refuted by both parties.
“The
report is incorrect and we have nothing more to add,"
Netanyahu's spokesman Liran Dan reiterated after the latest
revelations. Shapiro also insists that no such argument took place.
Domestic
discord
An
outspoken critic of Barack Obama’s foreign policy throughout the
current term, the congressman used the exchange to score points with
the domestic audience. While taking the unusual step of revealing the
details of a private meeting with a close ally, he emphasized
repeatedly that “Israel had lost their patience with the Obama
Administration.”
Ahead
of November’s presidential face- off between the incumbent Obama
and Republican candidate, Mitt Romney, the two parties have diverged
on their stance on Iran. Romney has promised “unilateral support”
for an airstrike, while Obama has followed a more cautious policy of
sanctions and incentives and is unlikely to risk the massive
diplomatic fallout over an air strike and potential regional war in
the dying months of his term.
Meanwhile,
Tehran continues to deny it plans to build a nuclear bomb.
Earlier
this week, the International Atomic Energy Agency, released a series
a satellite pictures showing that Iran had “sanitized” Pashtun,
one of its military bases, by demolishing buildings and removing the
earth from potential nuclear test explosion sites. The Vienna-based
watchdog also claimed that since May Iran has doubled the amount of
uranium-enriching centrifuges at Fordo, the underground facility that
is the likely target of any air strike.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.