This is EXACTLY my perception of the matter - so I will give the following comments verbatim
---SMR
Dr.
Shakhovas words and why I believe any and all news on methane is now
on lock-down (to the best of their ability, anyway ) And
keep in mind these words were said BEFORE the Swerus C3 expedition in
the Arctic, which has revealed even WORSE news, news that did not get
talked about at the recent Royal Society meetings on Arctic sea ice
loss. and THAT'S why them being excluded from presenting is SO
important.
"Climate
Models without positive feedback loops are as helpful a description
of climate as a "scientific model" of a matchstick which
leaves out the head."
----Dorsi Lynn Diaz
10
October, 2014
The
most qualified scientists fear we’ll soon trigger the worst outcome
on our current path.
Runaway heating from positive Arctic feedbacks is only a few decades away, at most a hundred years.
Climate scientists Dr. Natalia Shakhova and Dr. Igor Semiletov, who’ve studied the Arctic for a decade, are sure. They say that all of the stabilizing processes are anomalous. layman’s terms they’re saying that every process keeping methane stable is anomalous. And by anomalous they mean abnormal … frighteningly abnormal.
Runaway heating from positive Arctic feedbacks is only a few decades away, at most a hundred years.
Climate scientists Dr. Natalia Shakhova and Dr. Igor Semiletov, who’ve studied the Arctic for a decade, are sure. They say that all of the stabilizing processes are anomalous. layman’s terms they’re saying that every process keeping methane stable is anomalous. And by anomalous they mean abnormal … frighteningly abnormal.
In this excerpt, Dan Miller gives us background on Arctic Methane.
In
Here
Dr Shakhova speaks for herself and Dr. Semiletov. Scientists speaking
professionally aren’t allowed to show fear. You may notice that Dr.
Shakhova avoids eye contact with the camera. She touches her face,
her chin.
A trained eye sees the body language of fear.
A trained eye sees the body language of fear.
An
impressive list of scientists contributed to the 71 minute video
Arctic
Death Spiral and the Methane Time Bomb. Some
parts are harder to grasp as spoken language has halts, rephrasing,
and sometimes poor grammar.
Transcripts
of the remix videos are attached (below), but these paraphrases are
concise.
Paraphrase
for Dan Miller
- The Arctic stores methane.
- It’s currently melting.
- The average world temperature is only up a degree but in the Arctic it’s up five degrees.
- The Arctic is releasing fifty million tons of methane per year, and rising.
- If it all went up we’d basically all be dead.
- It’s happening now.
- Once those accelerating processes generate more CO2 than we do, it’ll keep going even if we stopped completely.
These
are positive feedback loops, and they aren’t in the climate models.
Climate
Models without positive feedback loops are as helpful a description
of climate as a "scientific model" of a matchstick which
leaves out the head.
Paraphrase
for Natalia Shakhova
There
is a potential risk that if warming continues a massive amount of
methane could be released from this Arctic shelf.
The
Siberian Arctic Shelf has the most potential risk because the carbon
pool is huge, the wall of the shell is very shallow, and warming is
stronger there than other areas of the world ocean.
The
current atmosphere has about 5 Gigatonnes of methane. The East
Siberian Arctic shelf has approximately hundreds to thousands of
Gigatonnes.
Only
one percent of that amount would double the atmosphere burden of
methane. Not much effort would be needed to destabilize one percent
of this carbon pool, because of:
It’s a matter of decades, at most a hundred years.
- The state of the permafrost
- The amount of methane involved
- What divides this methane from the atmosphere is a very shallow watercolumn and a weakening permafrost, losing its ability to seal
It’s a matter of decades, at most a hundred years.
Many
factors convince us that a runaway process might happen.
Igor
Semiletov is convinced because he spent a lot of time over
there, and where the ice should be about two meters thick it was
forty centimeters thick. All of the processes that stabilize
everything look anomalous, in the sea, the ice, the water column, and
the currents under the ice. Because everything looks anomalous he
thinks that the worst might happen.
Methane
bubbling out of East Siberian continental slope methane hydrates is
likely a result of warmer water reaching the Arctic Ocean from the
Gulf Stream.
......
Just
a week into the sampling program and SWERUS-C3 scientists have
discovered vast methane plumes escaping from the seafloor of the
Laptev continental slope.
”This
was somewhat of a surprise,” writes chief scientist Örjan
Gustafsson, Stockholm University, ... He speculates that the
leaking methane from the seafloor of the continental slope may have
its origins in collapsing “methane hydrates,”
clusters of methane trapped in frozen water due to high pressure and
low temperature.
“While
there has been much speculation about the vulnerability of regular
marine hydrates along the continental slopes of the Arctic rim, very
few actual observations of methane releases due to collapsing marine
hydrates on the Arctic slope have been made,” …
Örjan
Gustafsson thinks that the
mechanism behind the presence of methane seeps at these depths may
have something to do with the ”tongue” of relatively warm
Atlantic water, presumably intruding across the Arctic Ocean at
200-600 m depths.” Some evidence have shown that this water mass
has recently become warmer. As this warm Atlantic water, the last
remnants of the Gulf Stream, propagates eastward along the upper
slope of the East Siberian margin, it may lead to destabilization of
methane hydrates on the upper portion of the slope. This may be what
we are now seeing for the first time,”
writes Örjan Gustafsson. [emphasis mine, excepting for first
sentence]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.