I
have twice been to Sri Lanka and have always had the impression of a
green and verdant land where everything grows in abundance.
That
is changing very rapidly, as the following two articles demonstrate
Blistering
Drought Leaves the Poorest High and Dry
By
Amantha Perera
29
September, 2014
COLOMBO,
Sep 29 2014 (IPS) - The last time there was mud on his village roads
was about a year ago, says Murugesu Mohanabavan, a farmer from the
village of Karachchi, situated about 300 km north of Sri Lanka’s
capital, Colombo.
“Since
last October we have had nothing but sun, all day,” the 40-year-old
father of two school-aged children told IPS. If his layman’s
assessment of the rain patterns is off, it is by a mere matter of
weeks.
At
the disaster management unit of the Kilinochchi District Secretariat
under which Mohanabavan’s village falls, reports show inadequate
rainfall since November 2013 – less than 30 percent of expected
precipitation for this time of year.
“We
don’t have any savings left; I still need to complete a half-built
house and send two children to school. The nightmare continues."
-- Murugesu Mohanabavan, a farmer from the village of Karachchi, 300
km north of Sri Lanka’s capital, Colombo
Sri
Lanka is currently facing a severe drought that has impacted over 1.6
million people and cut its crop yields by 42 percent, according to
government analyses. But a closer look at the areas where the drought
is at its worst shows that the poorest have been hit hardest.
Of
the drought-affected population, over half or roughly 900,000 people,
are from the Northern and Eastern Provinces of the country, regions
that have been traditionally poor, dependent on agriculture and
lacking strong coping mechanisms or infrastructure to withstand the
impact of natural disasters.
Take
the northern Kilinochchi district, where out of a population of some
120,000, over 74,000 are affected by the drought; or the adjoining
district of Mullaithivu where over 56,000 from a population of just
above 100,000 are suffering the impacts of inadequate rainfall.
The
vast majority of residents in these districts are war returnees, who
bore the brunt of Sri Lanka’s protracted civil war that ended in
May 2009. Displaced and dodging the crossfire of fierce fighting
between government forces and the now-defunct Liberation Tigers of
Tamil Eelam (LTTE) during the last stages of the conflict, these
civilians began trickling back into devastated villages in late 2010.
Despite
a massive three-billion-dollar mega infrastructure development plan
for the Northern Province, poverty remains rampant in the region.
According to poverty data that was released by the government in
April, four of the five districts in the north fared poorly.
While
the national poverty headcount was 6.7 percent, major districts in
the north and east recorded much higher figures: 28.8 percent in
Mullaithivu, 12.7 percent in Kilinochchi, 8.3 percent in Jaffnna and
20.1 percent in Mannar.
The
figures are worlds apart from the mere 1.4 percent and 2.1 percent
recorded in the Colombo and Gampaha Districts in the Western
Province.
“The
districts in the North were already reeling under very high levels of
poverty, which would have certainly accentuated since then due to the
prolonged drought to date,” said Muttukrishna Saravananthan, who
heads the Point Pedro Institute of Development based in northern
Jaffna.
Mohanabavan
told IPS that even though he has about two acres of agriculture land
that had hitherto provided some 200,000 rupees (1,500 dollars) in
income annually, the dry weather has pushed him into debt.
“We
don’t have any savings left; I still need to complete a half-built
house and send two children to school,” he explained, adding that
there is no sign of respite. “The nightmare continues,” he said
simply.
Agriculture
accounts for 10 percent of Sri Lanka’s national annual gross
domestic product (GDP) of some 60 billion rupees (about 460 million
dollars). In primarily rural provinces in the north and east, at
least 30 percent of the population depends on an agriculture-based
income.
Kugadasan
Sumanadas, the additional secretary for disaster management at the
Kilinochchi District Secretariat, said that limited programmes to
assist the drought-impacted population have been launched since the
middle of the year.
Around
37,000 persons get daily water transported by tankers and there are a
set number of cash-for-work programmes in the district that pay
around 800 rupees (about six dollars) per person per day, for
projects aimed at renovating water and irrigtation networks.
But
to carry out even the limited work underway now, a weekly allocation
of over nine million rupees is needed, money that is slow in coming.
“But
the bigger problem is if it does not rain soon, then we will have to
travel out of the province to get water, more people will need
assistance for a longer period, that means more money [will be
required],” Sumanadas said.
In
April this year, a joint assessment by the World Food Programme and
the government warned that half the population in the Mullaithivu
district and one in three people in the Kilinochchi district were
food insecure.
Sumanadas
is certain that in the ensuing four months, the figure has gone up.
Overall,
crop production has decreased by 42 percent compared to 2013 levels,
while rice yields fell to 17 percent below last year’s output of
four million metric tons.
In
fact, the government decided to lift import bans on the staple rice
stocks in April and is expected to make up for at least five percent
of harvest losses through imports.
The
main water source in the district, the sprawling Iranamadu Reservoir
– 50 square km in size, with the capacity to irrigate 106,000 acres
– is a gigantic dust bowl these days, the official said. That
scenario, however, is not limited to the north and east.
“All
reservoir levels are down to around 30 percent in the island,” Ivan
de Silva, the secretary to the minister of irrigation and water
management, told IPS.
He
attributes the debilitating impact of the drought to two factors
working in tandem: the increasing frequency of extreme weather events
and the lack of proper water management.
“In
the past we excepted a severe drought every 10 to 15 years, now it is
happening almost every other year,” de Silva said.
A
similar drought in late 2012 also impacted close to two million
people on this island of just over 20 million people, and forced
agricultural output down to 20 percent of previous yields.
That
drought however was broken by the onset of floods brought on by
hurricane Nilam in late 2012.
“We
should have policies that allow us to manage our water resources
better, so that we can better meet these changing weather patterns,”
he said.
The
country is slowly waking up to the grim reality that a changing
climate requires better management. This week the government launched
a 100-million-dollar climate resilience programme that will spend the
bulk of its funds, around 90 million dollars, on infrastructure
upgrades.
Of
this, 47 million dollars will go towards improving drainage networks
and water systems, while 36 million will go towards fortifying roads
and seven million will be poured into projects to improve school
safety in disaster-prone areas.
Part
of the money will also be allocated to studying the nine main river
basins around the country for better flood and drought management
policies.
S
M Mohammed, the secretary to the ministry of disaster management,
admitted that national coping levels were not up to par when she said
at the launch of the programme on Sep. 26, “Our country must change
from a tradition of responding [to natural disasters] to a culture of
resilience.”
Such
a policy, if implemented, could bring a world of change to the lives
of millions who are slowly cooking in the blistering sun.
The
following article was written back in May and describes the capital
Colombo which usually gets a lot of rain
Sri
Lanka Waits in Vain for the Rain
29
September, 2014
OLOMBO,
May 30 2014 (IPS) - Stuck in mid-day rush hour traffic, commuters
packed tight into a tin-roofed bus in Sri Lanka’s capital, Colombo,
peer expectantly up at the sky that is beating a savage heat down on
the city.
No
one speaks, but it is clear they are all waiting for the same thing:
for the heavens to open up and provide some relief from the scorching
weather that is slowly cooking this island nation.
Over
200 km east, in the agricultural district of Ampara, farmers and
rural folk wait equally expectantly for the elusive monsoon, already
a few weeks late in coming.
Water
levels at the Senanayake Samudraya tank, which holds the bulk of the
district’s water needs, are dangerously low, having dropped below
30 percent of the reservoir’s capacity at the end of May, according
to the department of irrigation.
All
over the country, low-level anxiety over the water shortage is slowly
giving way to panic. With each day that the rains do not fall, food
shortages increase, poverty worsens and the economy lurches in
uncertainty.
Strangely,
the government is yet to officially declare a drought situation, even
though water levels in most major reservoirs – which supply close
to 46 percent of the country’s electricity needs – are alarmingly
low.
No
rain, no rice
“The
problem is that this is not a one-off drought, this is the third big
drought in three years." -- Rajith Punyawardena, chief
climatologist at the department of agriculture
Given
that over 75 percent of Sri Lanka’s population lives in rural
areas, with a large percentage engaged in rice farming, a drought
threatens the country to its very core.
Harvest
losses mounted in the first half of this year, leaving farmers and
officials fearful that a predicted weaker-than-average southwest
monsoon season will exacerbate the situation.
“It
is not looking very good,” warned Rajith Punyawardena, chief
climatologist at the department of agriculture, pointing out that the
main rice harvesting season, which concluded in April, recorded a
loss of 17 percent compared to last year.
According
to a recent update from the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the
United Nations (FAO), Sri Lanka only produced 2.4 million metric tons
of paddy during the main harvest in 2014, compared to around 2.8
million last year.
The
FAO predicted that overall paddy output on the island in 2014 was
likely to record a 19 percent loss from the previous year, with an
expected production of 3.8 million metric tons – eight percent less
than the five-year average yield since 2014.
Weerakkodiarchchilage
Premadasa, a farmer from Thanamalvila in Sri Lanka’s southeastern
Uva province, told IPS he had already lost half of his two acres of
paddy to the drought. “If the rains don’t come, or are too weak,
I will have to mortgage the house,” he said.
High
demand and predictions of further losses pushed rice prices up by 23
percent this past April.
Meanwhile,
a report compiled last month by the World Food Programme (WFP),
together with Sri Lanka’s ministries of economic development and
disaster management, detailed the country’s precarious situation
vis-à-vis erratic weather, including the drought’s potential
impact on food security and livelihoods.
In
affected regions across the northern, eastern and northwestern
provinces, over 768,000 persons out of a total population of 8.3
million have been identified as food insecure, double the 2013
figure. In addition, 18 percent of all households in over 15
districts in those same regions were consuming low-calorie diets.
Over
67 percent of the affected population are farmers who rely heavily on
irrigated water for their livelihoods and daily subsistence. An
unbroken string of extreme weather events since 2011 has heightened
food insecurity and severely impacted rural populations’ resilience
to natural disasters like droughts and floods, the report added.
Experts
say the northern province, which accounts for 10 percent of the
national paddy harvest, is particularly vulnerable. It lost over 60
percent of an estimated 300,000-metric-ton harvest in April,
according to Sivapathan Sivakumar, the provincial director for
agriculture.
Having
borne the brunt of the island’s protracted civil conflict, which
finally closed its bloody 30-year chapter in 2009, the people here
have shouldered about as much hardship as they can take. A possible
debt-trap, caused by repeated losses in harvest, has them on the
edge, Sivakumar added.
“We
have to come up with a major assistance plan to help them,” the
official told IPS.
According
to the joint WFP-governmental report, the northern districts of
Mullaitivu and Kilinochchi have been hardest hit, with 49 percent and
31 percent of their respective populations identified as food
insecure as a result of drought.
Urgent
need for national planning
Those
who are monitoring the situation say the drought will bring more than
just hunger. Already food shortages are taking a disproportionate
toll on low-income households, who have no safety net against harvest
losses and rising prices.
In
the districts surveyed by the WFP, a full 50 percent of households
were spending over 65 percent of their monthly income, about 20
dollars, on food.
Poverty
levels in these areas are also rising, with families reporting damage
to agricultural land, limited employment opportunities as a result of
scarce yields and significant reductions to their income.
“The
average income in these areas is reported to be 37 percent lower than
the national poverty line [of 29 dollars] for the month of March,”
the report found.
In
some areas, there was a big gap between expected income and actual
income. In the northwestern Kurunegala district, a relatively rich
region, actual income was 76 dollars, 81 percent below the expected
income of 190 dollars.
In
the northern Vavuniya district, actual income for the month of April
was 67 percent below expected income.
The
WFP has recommended the immediate commencements of six months of
emergency assistance to the worst affected populations, but officials
say this is easier said than done.
“The
problem is that this is not a one-off drought, this is the third big
drought in three years,” Punyawardena told IPS. “We need a
national plan to assess and deal with the impact of extreme weather
events.”
A
drought between December 2011 and October 2012 affected 1.8 million
people in the same regions currently enduring the dry spell,
according to assessments by the International Federation of Red Cross
and Red Crescent Societies. During that time, total harvest losses
were feared to be between 15 and 20 percent.
So
far, the only drought-related move has come from the ministry of
agriculture, which has recommended that 35 percent of the 779,000
hectares of land under paddy cultivation be used for crops that
require less water.
But
Punyawardena believes that paddy farmers steeped in traditional
farming practices are unlikely to change their methods or crops
quickly. Such a move, he said, “needs time and a bit more work.”
As
Premadasa, the farmer from the Uva province, pointed out, “Farmers
like me need advice at the start of the planting season so we can
plan accordingly. We get some information, but we need more detailed
updates.”
Similar
long-term planning will also be required to cushion the blow a weak
monsoon could deliver to the country’s energy sector.
The
Ceylon Electricity Board reported that as of the last week of May,
hydro power was only meeting 11.8 percent of the country’s energy
needs, compared to 46 percent during previous monsoon seasons.
Water
experts told IPS there is an urgent need for an integrated national
water management policy that takes note of fluctuating rain patterns.
“It
will allow for national-level planning of water resources,
identifying and prioritising needs and acting accordingly,” Kusum
Atukorale, who chairs the Sri Lanka Water Partnership, told IPS.
Such
a policy, she said, would allow for the kind of countrywide planning
that is woefully lacking right now.
Until
the government puts its best foot forward, the people of Sri Lanka
can do little more than look to the skies and pray for the rain to
fall.
Falling
off the map: did India notice floods in northeast?
4
October, 2014
Assam’s
valleys are used to floods. But what hit the state’s western
region, bordering Meghalaya, last month was unprecedented; people
there had never imagined that killer waters would rise up in moments
and sweep their entire lives away.
Ask
cousins Nayan and Rupam, 13. They both lost their parents when a
flash flood — the result of incessant rainfall from September 20 to
23 — struck Kamarpara, a village of potters 100 km west of
Guwahati.
River
Singra, flowing down from the hills of adjoining Meghalaya to join
the Brahmaputra downstream, never seemed like a threat to these
villagers on higher ground. “We shifted here from a flood-prone
area. We were wrong to think that the floods wouldn’t chase us,”
says village elder Nakul Kumar, 69.
In
Dilinga village nearby, Padma Das, 66, recounts the ‘water attack’.
“Suddenly, we found ourselves in 10 feet of water. Our houses are
damaged and paddy fields ruined,” he says.
These
Assam villages were perhaps luckier than Bholarbitha in Meghalaya’s
West Garo Hills district. River Jinjiram, a tributary of the
Brahmaputra, wiped out more than 80% of this village’s 300
homes.“Our village used to be inundated every monsoon, but this
time was different. The current of the water was too strong; it was
as if we were hit by a cyclone in liquid form,” says Zubair
Hussain.
Villages
in this part of Meghalaya, close to Bangladesh, are acquainted with
Bordoichila, the annual springtime storm eulogised in Assamese
folklore. But this year’s floods were an unprecedented disaster.
Meteorologists
attribute it to unusually high post-monsoon rain, but ecologists
blame it on climate change, encroachment on hill slopes and a
degradation and even partial destruction of a network of wetlands
that once were natural absorbers of excess rainwater.
In
Meghalaya, chief minister Mukul Sangma admitted that illegal stone
quarries have affected the ecology of the hills and the course of
rivers.
“Letting
people [mostly migrants] settle on riverbanks and sandbars has
complicated matters,” says environment scientist JD Goswami. “All
this is making the flooding more intense and more widespread.”
He
has a point; this year, most of the 179 victims across Arunachal
Pradesh, Assam and Meghalaya were from areas beyond traditional
flood-prone zones. And in the urban bustle of Guwahati, where a
construction boom has claimed many beels or expansive ponds, a total
of six died from drowning, electrocution and landslides.
Rescue
operations began fairly promptly, as the affected areas have an
active Border Security Force presence, in addition to the Army and
units of the National Disaster Response Force.
Union
minister of state for home Kiren Rijiju and union minister of state
for sports and youth affairs Sarbananda Sonowal — both originally
from the region — responded relatively quickly on behalf of the
Centre, arriving to take stock of the situation.
But
the victims, particularly in Meghalaya, complained of not receiving
adequate relief.
This
is a persistent problem in the flood-prone north-east. Though 179
people have been killed by flooding here in 2014 alone — 68 in
Assam, 56 in Arunachal Pradesh, and 55 in Meghalaya — only Rs. 887
crore has been allocated in relief by the Centre; Rs. 674 crore of
this for Assam. By comparison, when the city of Mumbai was inundated
in the 26/7 deluge of 2005 — nine years ago — the Centre
allocated Rs. 476 crore in relief funds.
Meanwhile,
across 28 districts in the north-east — 23 of these in Assam —
floods have caused losses worth an estimated Rs. 4,350 crore in
infrastructure damage and crop loss this year alone, with Assam
accounting for Rs. 2,010 crore of this loss.
“We
are trying our best to provide succour to the victims besides
offering compensation to families of those who have died,” says
Assam chief minister Tarun Gogoi.
Meanwhile,
even online — where some local NGOs have gone to try and raise
funds and material for relief operations — the response has been
nothing like the outpouring, say, in the wake of the recent Kashmir
floods.
Prime
Minister Narendra Modi has announced Rs. 2 lakh as compensation for
the families of each person killed, promising to do more for the
region as rain-bearing clouds threaten more havoc over the coming
weeks. For the time being, though, the states and Centre are still
arguing over who should do how much.
As
Patricia Mukhim, editor of The Shillong Times, says: “The
north-east will always remain a periphery. It needs bombs and blood
and dead bodies to make news.”
Massive
Pacific Coast die off of starfish continues, may be harbinger of
climate change
2
October, 2014
A
grisly horror show is playing out along the West Coast of North
America. Remains of millions of dead and dying sea stars, commonly
known as starfish, litter the shoreline from Vancouver to San Diego.
Those
stars are the victims of a swift and brutal illness called "wasting
syndrome."
No
one yet knows the exact causes of the epidemic. Some evidence
suggests the outbreak is linked to warming ocean temperatures or
other changes in the ocean due to climate change.
Sea
stars are, in a way, the canary in the coal mine of the ocean...
To
read the rest of Massive Pacific Coast
die off of starfish continues, may be harbinger of climate change,
Please Login Below:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.