Monday, 15 September 2014

Ukraine civil war - update

Strelkov's September 11 Statement Laid Out Openly and Plainly: The Meaning of Novorossiya and the Minsk Protocol


Via Facebook (via Vladimir Suchan)

The essential meaning of Igor Strelkov’s statements made on September 11, 2014 in Moscow plain and simple


1. Strelkov was removed from his position of the Commander in Chief of the Donetsk People’s Republic by Moscow, but that does not mean that directly by Putin.

2. Moscow forced Strelkov to resign at a dangerous moment when “the city of Donetsk and the entire grouping of the DPR armed forces were in an operational encirclement.”

3. No politically and militarily authority wishing well would do this to the command of an army in such circumstances.

4. The same forces that removed Strelkov from his post also let Kiev dictate the political demands or conditions contained in the Minsk Ceasefire Protocol of September 5.

5. The Minsk Protocol was an attempt “to eliminate the People’s Liberation Movement of the Russian people of Novorossiya.”

6. In fact, Strelkov’s removal from Novorossiya by a fifth column within the Russian government was part of the preparation and necessary condition for the Minsk Protocol—capitulation and surrender of Novorossiya in the guise of “ceasefire.”

7. The Minsk Protocol was designed to a) reverse nearly all the gains of the offensive of the Army of Novorossiya, b) effect barely concealed capitulation and treason. In Strelkov’s words: “To the punitive army that was on the precipice of total defeat they immediately extended a ‘helping hand’ by arranging a ceasefire and attempting, in the course of the negotiations, to surrender literally all the gains made by those who rose up; placing them at the mercy of the Kiev Junta. It is simply impossible to come up with more disgraceful covenants that those currently being discussed in Minsk.”The Minsk Protocol was disgraceful and treasonous.

8. The forces that made Strelkov resign and that were also behind the Minsk Protocol are described by Strelkov as follows: “The web of numerous agents that for many years successfully masqueraded in the sheep’s clothing of “patriots” and “statists”, and under this guise infiltrated the highest echelons of power, and even the entourage of the President of Russia … these traitors nevertheless continue brazenly to assert that they are the President’s “friends”, and to portray their frankly subversive activities and sabotage as the only true measures to strengthen Russian sovereignty.” Strelkov calls them “traitors.”

9. This fifth column is led by oligarchs and by people who are part of the Russian government: “[T]hey havie a strong presence in the leadership and considerable financial resources …”

10. Early “Russian military aid … could – almost without bloodshed – lead to the liberation of all the Russian-speaking regions.” But this was sabotaged by the very forces described in #9 and 10.

11. The heaviest charge against hits fifth column and the identification of their political center of gravity within the Russian government is here: “While the punitive forces were burning people alive in Odessa, bombarding Slavyansk with heavy artillery and urgently forming a combat-capable army, their accomplices, who penetrated the foreign policy leadership of Russia, not only sabotaged any and all military and political assistance to the Militia, but also – in complete understanding with Poroshenko, Turchinov, Akhmetov, Taruta, and other representatives of the Ukrainian oligarchy – worked to split the ranks of the Militia’s leadership; preventing the creation of a unified command, and through joint efforts attempted to lure the President of Russia into the traps laid by them.”

12. Strelkov says: “Real help from Russia [then] finally reached its addressee. The Militia commenced its offensive.” In other words, aid did come and it came just in time for the offensive that started in later August.

13. The strategic plan of the US-pursued war on Russia and the role of the fifth column within Russia’s political structures is as follows: “Western countries … [and] Islamist militants controlled by the United States … are preparing to fight Russia for a long time and in earnest. The West and the Fifth Column make virtually no secret of their plans to overthrow President Putin; and subsequently to completely dismantle Russia. Their agents of influence use all means at their disposal to convince the leadership of the country that reconciliation is not only possible, but also singularly necessary. The fact that nothing but Russia’s complete capitulation will appease its enemies is being carefully concealed from the public and, possibly, even from the President.”

14. The task given to this fifth column, which exercises a good deal of influence over Russian foreign policy is “the betrayal of the Russian people of Novorossiya, followed by the laying of all responsibility therefor on the President himself.”

15. “The traitors hope eventually to bring the situation to the conclusion of a most shameful and humiliating peace treaty, accompanied by the betrayal of the Russian population of Ukraine … [and then] to bring about a Moscow Maidan … [this] follows the scheme of ‘shameful defeat – economic crisis – discrediting of the authorities – popular uprisings – palace coup’ is once again in action.”

16. To preserve Novorossiya means to preserve Russia. To defend Novorossiya is to defend Russia: “If we are able to secure a victory there – we will preserve Russia. If we lose – we will accordingly lose the remnants of our Fatherland. In this struggle there can be no compromises, and he who tries to convince otherwise is, consciously or not, grist to the mill of the enemy.”

17. Vladimir Putin is and has been Strelkov’s Commander-in-Chief.

18. The purge of the fifth column is the urgent task of the moment. The situation demands it. Russia’s survival depends on it. So does the survival of Novorossiya. The conflict is not an “internal” Ukrainian conflict.

19. “We must expose and remove from power those of Novorossiya’s ‘well-wishers’ that have brought us to the brink of military defeat.”


Translation used here is by Gleb Bazov, edited by S. Naylor from slavyangrad.org

Ukraine Rebel Leader Vows to Stay in Moscow to Protect Putin
Igor Strelkov, the former commander of pro-Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine, said Thursday he was relocating to Moscow to protect President Vladimir Putin from enemies and traitors.


11 September, 2014


"The West and the 'fifth column' are making no secret of their plans to overthrow Putin. Their path is that of dragging out the war [in Ukraine] as long as possible," Strelkov was cited by LifeNews as saying at a news conference.

Strelkov, a 43-year-old Muscovite also known by the surname Girkin, said he had no plans to return to eastern Ukraine and would instead stay in Moscow — the new battle front, according to him.

"I support Putin and am against the 'fifth column.' Russian people need to completely reject any opposition activity," Strelkov was cited as saying in the report.

The term "fifth column" has been used frequently in Russia during the Ukraine crisis to describe Western leaders and the new authorities in Kiev, who separatists like Strelkov have refused to recognize as legitimate.

Strelkov was thrust into the spotlight as a rebel leader in mid-May, quickly taking control over many of the fighters in eastern Ukraine and declaring himself defense minister of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic.

Strelkov is a retired colonel in Russia's Federal Security Service, a successor agency to the KGB. He also fought in the Bosnian war and served as a war correspondent in Chechnya.


He stepped down from his duties as military commander in Donetsk in mid-August.



Pavel Gubarev on the Minsk "Ceasefire" Protocol

Pavel Gubarev on the Minsk "Ceasefire" Protocol: It is a treasonous document. Treasonous both to Novorossyia and Russia. As such, it has also been overwhelmingly rejected by public opinion. The text and its arrangements are so bad that appears that its authors were both Russian and Ukrainian oligarchs and their surrogates, though Ukrainian oligarchs seemed to have the leading role.

Pavel Gubarev hopes that Igor Strelkov will be returned to a leadership position in Novorossiya.


By saving Novorossiya Russia is saving herself



No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.