Recovery: Debtors’ Prisons Thrive
April
5th, 2013
Thousands
of Americans are sent to jail not for committing a crime, but because
they can’t afford to pay for traffic tickets, medical bills and
court fees.
If
that sounds like a debtors’ prison, a legal relic which was
abolished in this country in the 1830s, that’s because it is. And
courts and judges in states across the land are violating the
Constitution by incarcerating people for being unable to pay such
debts.
Ask
Jack Dawley, 55, an unemployed man in Ohio who between 2007 and 2012
spent a total of 16 days in jail in a Huron County lock-up for
failing to pay roughly $1,500 in legal fines he’d incurred in the
1990s. The fines stemmed from Dawley’s convictions for driving
under the influence and other offenses. After his release from a
Wisconsin correctional facility, Dawley, who admits he had struggled
with drugs and alcohol, got clean. But if he put his substance
problems behind him, Dawley’s couldn’t outrun his debts.
Struggling
to find a job and dealing with the effects of a back injury, he fell
behind on repayments to the municipal court in Norwalk, Ohio. He was
arrested six years ago and sent to jail for not paying his original
court fines. Although Dawley was put on a monthly payment plan,
during his latest stint behind bars in 2012 the court ordered him to
pay off his entire remaining debt.
”
I
called my brother, and they told him I have to pay off the whole fine
in order for me to get out,” he said. “That was $900. So I sat my
whole 10 days [in jail.]”
Such
stories are by no means unusual. Rather, they reflect a justice
system that in effect criminalizes poverty. “It’s a growing
problem nationally, particularly because of the economic crisis,”
said Inimai Chettiar, director of the justice program at New York
University School of Law’s Brennan Center for Justice.
Roughly
a third of U.S. states today jail people for not paying off their
debts, from court-related fines and fees to credit card and car
loans, according to the American Civil Liberties Union. Such
practices contravene a 1983 United States Supreme Court ruling that
they violate the Constitutions’s Equal Protection Clause.
Some
states apply “poverty penalties,” such as late fees, payment plan
fees and interest, when people are unable to pay all their debts at
once. Alabama charges a 30 percent collection fee, for instance,
while Florida allows private debt collectors to add a 40 percent
surcharge on the original debt. Some Florida counties also use
so-called collection courts, where debtors can be jailed but have no
right to a public defender. In North Carolina, people are charged for
using a public defender, so poor defendants who can’t afford such
costs may be forced to forgo legal counsel.

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.