BP's
Big Plan: Burn It.
Ignoring overtly and by design the dire and repeated warnings of scientists who say that in order to avoid catastrophic and irreversible changes to the world's climate we must drastically reduce carbon emissions by curbing our use of fossil fuels, BP has a different plan for the next two decades which translates to this: Burn it. Burn whatever we can find.
Focusing on shale oil and other hard-to-reach fuels and citing "favourable regulatory terms" in North American countries (namely the US and Canada) for current profit growth, BP plans says that it now hopes less developed countries "will succeed" in paving a path for more unconventional fuel extraction in the coming years. BP's plan says that its global oil extraction could increase over the next two decades.
Burn It All.
Showing
no concern for climate, CEO of oil giant says notions
of Peak Oil are
'increasingly groundless'
17
January, 2013
Ignoring overtly and by design the dire and repeated warnings of scientists who say that in order to avoid catastrophic and irreversible changes to the world's climate we must drastically reduce carbon emissions by curbing our use of fossil fuels, BP has a different plan for the next two decades which translates to this: Burn it. Burn whatever we can find.
Amid
release of its annual Energy
Outlook Report,
BP's chief executive Bob Dudley says that a surge in unconventional
carbon fuel extraction should be heralded, not challenged.
“The
Outlook shows the degree to which once-accepted wisdom has been
turned on its head," Dudley said in the statement. "Fears
over oil running out — to which
BP has never subscribed — appear
increasingly groundless."
Focusing on shale oil and other hard-to-reach fuels and citing "favourable regulatory terms" in North American countries (namely the US and Canada) for current profit growth, BP plans says that it now hopes less developed countries "will succeed" in paving a path for more unconventional fuel extraction in the coming years. BP's plan says that its global oil extraction could increase over the next two decades.
But
the result, as The
Guardian's
Fiona Harvey points out, is that
carbon dioxide emissions will rise by more than a quarter by 2030 – a disaster, according to scientists, because if the world is to avoid dangerous climate change then studies suggest emissions must peak in the next three years or so.
So-called unconventional oil – shale oil, tar sands and biofuels – are the most controversial forms of the fuel, because they are much more carbon-intensive than conventional oilfields. They require large amounts of energy and water, and have been associated with serious environmental damages.
Dudley's
comments—and the Outlook report itself—shows the chasm that
exists between what the world's largest oil companies are preparing
to do and what climate scientists are calling for with increasing
urgency.
At
one level, Dudley betrays his fundamental understanding of the term
'peak oil.' As energy expert Nafeez Mosaddeq
Ahmed explained recently:
For most serious analysts, far from signifying a world running out of oil, "peak oil" refers simply to the point when, due to a combination of below-ground geological constraints and above-ground economic factors, oil becomes increasingly and irreversibly more difficult and expensive to produce.
Ahmed
argues, despite what energy giants like BP would like to believe or
say publicly, that moment is here.
And
as author Naomi Klein outlines in an article
written in
the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy last fall, it has become necessary
to challenge the business model that thinks destroying the earth's
climate in the name of profit is permissible.
"These
companies have shown that they are willing to burn five times as
much carbon as the most conservative estimates say is compatible
with a livable planet," Klein said. "We’ve done the
math, and we simply can’t let them."

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.