The
world asks if NZ milk is safe to drink.
From the Wall Street Journal
In years gone by there would
have been no question about this. But that was in the day before
factory farming and the development of dairying as a monoculture that
has led to destruction of traditional farming land, the pollution of
our pristine waterways,
So
much for 'clean and green New Zealand'!
Those
governments that have a zero tolerance for toxins are correct.
Fonterra can issue assurances until the cows come home (sorry for the
pun), but there is NO 'safe level' of toxins (such as fertilsers) in our food.
By the
way there has been NO mention in the media about what NZ consumers
are exposed to.
In
the meantime, it has been revealed that New Zealanders have been guineapigs, not only for a new Facebook system, but, more importantly
for copyright regulations.
Here
is coverage from international media as well as a reaction from the
NZ press.
Is
NZ milk safe to drink?
From the Wall Street Journal
Fonterra,
Government Working to Quell New Zealand Milk Scare
By
Chris Bourke -
25January,
2013
Fonterra
Cooperative Group Ltd. (FCG), the world’s largest dairy exporter,
and New Zealand officials are working to stop a milk contamination
scare from hurting the nation’s NZ$14.5 billion ($12.1 billion)
dairy export industry.
Fonterra
has fielded “a few” enquiries from customers, with no adverse
reactions, a spokesman for the Auckland-based company, said today by
telephone after tests found low levels of the fertilizer aid
dicyandiamide, or DCD, in dairy products. Fonterra isn’t recalling
any products, he said.
The
discovery, while presenting no food safety risk, may become a trade
issue, Fonterra, which accounts for about 40 percent of the global
dairy trade, said yesterday. Ravensdown Fertiliser Co-operative Ltd.
and Ballance Agri-Nutrients Co- operative have voluntarily suspended
DCD sales, while the government has established a working group to
assess the future of DCD to ensure it meets trade requirements.
“If
this was to actually become an issue for international players, then
clearly two-thirds of our exports rely, to some extent, on that sort
of reputation and it’s going to raise an eyebrow or two,” Doug
Steel, a markets economist at Bank of New Zealand, said by phone.
“But I don’t think this is that one.”
Fonterra
Shareholders’ Fund fell 8 New Zealand cents, or 1.1 percent, to
NZ$7.23 in Wellington trading at the 5 p.m. close. The shares climbed
1.1 percent yesterday.
DCD
aims to improve water quality on farms by reducing nitrate levels, as
well as cut greenhouse gas emissions, according to the government.
It’s been used on about 500 out of around 12,000 dairy farms, said
Federated Farmers.
Global
Markets
“There
was the possibility that New Zealand milk products could have been
excluded from international markets because of this,” according to
a statement on the Ministry of Primary Industry’s web site. “The
action we have taken is to prevent that happening.”
Fonterra,
which exports to more than 100 countries, is relying on China and
emerging markets to drive growth. In 2008, a melamine-milk
contamination in China killed at least six infants, causing the
collapse of its local partner Sanlu Group.
Fonterra’s
precautions reflect the company’s reliance on international markets
for growth. The company forecasts the global diary trade will
increase at least 100 billion liters by 2020, led by China and India.
The
government is working with Fonterra to decide how DCD can be used to
meet trade requirements, according to the ministry. The absence of
agreed levels means that any presence could be unacceptable to some
markets, according to the statement.
Trade
Risk
“These
residues have only come to light given the increased sophistication
of testing we now possess,” William Rolleston, food safety
spokesperson for industry body, Federated Farmers said yesterday in a
statement. “That said, a detectable level at this time presents a
trade risk, no matter how small.”
The
agricultural supply companies have worked with Fonterra and the
government to assess DCD use since December after low levels were
found in milk powder, Ravensdown said in a statement on its website.
“Food
regulators around the world are reflecting market demands with
increasingly rigorous testing and in some countries there is a zero
tolerance to detected residues outside agreed standards,” said
Carol Barnao, MPI Deputy Director General Standards, in the MPI
statement.
Fonterra
in December raised its forecast payment to farmers, saying it expects
higher global dairy prices in the first half of 2013. While milk
prices fell toward year-end as new season output from New Zealand and
other southern hemisphere producers entered the market, they are 28
percent higher than in mid-July after the worst U.S. drought in 56
years curbed supply.
World
asks: is NZ milk safe to drink?
27
January, 2013
The
decision to sit on the discovery of a toxic chemical found in
consumer milk was as part of a "measured and effective response"
that is now threatening to froth into a PR disaster for New Zealand.
New
Zealand trading partners are demanding answers and global business
media are playing up the tension over another potential milk tainting
scandal, with the Wall Street Journal running a headline: "Is
New Zealand milk safe to drink?"
The
Washington Post, running a story from the Bloomberg wire service,
said Fonterra and the Government were facing a "milk scare".
On
Friday, dairy company Fonterra announced that it had found low levels
of the fertiliser aid dicyandiamide (DCD) in dairy products. The
tests were undertaken in September, two months before the Ministry
for Primary Industries (MPI) was alerted.
That
delay has caused Labour's trade spokesman, Clayton Cosgrove, to
question whether such a decision could cause more widespread damage.
"In
customer relations, perception is the truth. Where there is a vacuum,
people will look at the media and what people have said and, more
importantly, what they haven't said, and make their own assumptions."
Despite
the tests revealing only "minute traces" of DCD residue in
a small number of Fonterra products and posing no apparent health
risk, the lack of information around the chemical has caused
international players like Taiwan to panic. While there was no health
risk, some countries have zero tolerance on adulterant in their food
products.
The
issue had become a "trade risk", said Greg Campbell, chief
executive of Ravensdown, which manufactures DCD.
Taiwan's
department of health asked its importers to investigate if their
products have came from New Zealand pastures that have been using
fertilisers containing DCD.
The
China Post quoted director of the Department of Toxicology at Linkuo
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Lin Chieh-liang, as saying high doses
of DCD could irritate human skin, potentially cause dermatitis and
may lead to liver damage.
That
panic was sparked by a Wall Street Journal article which labelled DCD
a "toxic" substance that could cause damage to New
Zealand's $10 billion dairy industry. Farmers apply DCD to pastures
to prevent the fertiliser byproduct nitrate from getting into rivers
and lakes.
After
the MPI was alerted, a working group comprising Fonterra, Ravensdown
and fellow DCD producer Ballance Agri-Nutrients, along with Dairy
Companies Association of New Zealand and staff from MPI, met discuss
how to deal with the problem. "It was important to fully assess
the situation and take a measured and effective response," a
ministry spokesperson said.
Fonterra
has said it chose not to disclose the chemical findings before
launching its $525m shareholder fund last November because it wasn't
"material" information. But Cosgrove said the public might
read into that and think there was something to hide, he said.
Cosgrove
was in government in 2008, when a melamine-milk contamination in
China killed at least six infants, causing the collapse of its local
partner Sanlu Group. He said "there was no politics in trade"
but he was surprised that Trade Minister Tim Groser had not made any
definitive statements about the DCD discovery. It was important to
keep New Zealand's trading partners informed about the integrity of
the country's food export products, he said.
Earlier
this month the Government told Fonterra there would be a voluntary
withdrawal of DCD products from the market.
Fonterra
managing director co-operative affairs, Todd Muller, said he was
"fully supportive" of this. He said the delay in making the
discovery public was because the working group had been gathering
information, sourcing scientific opinion, and conducting further
testing.
Muller
said that a 60kg person would have to drink more than 130 litres of
raw milk or consume some 60kg of milk powder to reach the limit for
an acceptable daily intake, and considerably more to have any health
effects from DCD.
"Clearly,
this would never happen."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.