Britain
to send forces to Mali as part of EU mission
British representatives are attending a meeting in Brussels on Tuesday to discuss the provision of troops as part of an EU mission to the African country. The EU estimates that 500 supplementary troops will be sent to Mali, some 350 of which will be British. This will include approximately 40 military advisers who will train soldiers in Mali and 200 British soldiers to be sent to neighboring African countries.
Downing
Street has said that the British government will dispatch 350 troops
to Mali to aid French troops stationed in the country's north, as
part of a UK mission to train local forces and engage in “force
protection.”
RT,
29
January, 2013
British representatives are attending a meeting in Brussels on Tuesday to discuss the provision of troops as part of an EU mission to the African country. The EU estimates that 500 supplementary troops will be sent to Mali, some 350 of which will be British. This will include approximately 40 military advisers who will train soldiers in Mali and 200 British soldiers to be sent to neighboring African countries.
An
ECOWAS (Economic Community Of West African States) force of West
African troops – about 7,500 of them – are also coming into
Mali to take over some garrison duties, and steadily take over the
fighting role from the French.
The
budget for the campaign, which has been set at around $950m will be
financed through an international donors' conference based in
Ethiopia.
British
Prime Minister David Cameron told French President François Hollande
on Sunday evening that the UK was keen to provide military assistance
in Mali and West Africa, including the training of local forces.
London
reiterated that British troops would not be participating directly in
combat, but would be providing armed “force
protection.”
However, Downing Street did state that the country has both
the “capability
and capacity” for
a larger deployment. The country has already supplied two C-17
military transport aircraft and a Sentinel surveillance plane.
“Two
weeks ago we started by offering transport planes to France; we then
sent force protection to back up the transport planes, we sent
trainers, we have additional force protection to protect them,”
UK Labor MP Jeremy Corbyn told RT.
Corbyn
expressed concerns that the new conflict in Mali very much resembles
the “French
reaction of Afghanistan in 2001.”
That war, which started in a “hunky-dory”
manner, later developed “into
a greater war which is now going on for 11 years,”
he explained.
France
has declared that, so far, they are “winning
this battle.”
It the past two weeks, French forces have had major successes in
pushing back the Islamist troops who seized strongholds in
northeastern Mali. The French gained a footing in the ancient city of
Timbuktu as recently as yesterday.
Islamist
forces seized control of Timbuktu last April, imposing sharia law in
the city. France responded to calls from the Malian government to
suppress the uprising that was gripping the country.
Prior
to leaving, the Islamists set alight to Timbuktu's
world-famous research center,
the Ahmed Baba, which opened in 2009 and housed over 20,000
documents, including medieval manuscripts, many of which remained
unstudied. The destruction has been labeled “cultural
vandalism”
and a “devastating
loss.”
US
signs deal with Niger to operate military drones in west African
state
Mali
Islamists' war reveals paucity of west's intelligence on Sahel and
Sahara but Pentagon's move could backfire, analysts warn
29
January, 2013
The
US government appears close to opening a new front in its fight
against Islamist militants by planning a new base for surveillance
drones in the west African country of Niger.
American
forces are already assisting a French offensive in neighbouring Mali
that is aimed at recapturing the country's northern desert territory
from the hands of Islamist rebels. On Monday the US signed a military
agreement with Niger that paves the way legally for US forces to
operate on its soil, prompting a series of reports that the Pentagon
was keen on opening a new drones base there.
That
news appeared to be confirmed by Niger government sources, who said
the US ambassador in Niamey, Bisa Williams, had asked Niger's
president, Mahamadou Issoufou, for permission to use surveillance
drones and had been granted it.
"Niger
has given the green light to accepting American surveillance drones
on its soil to improve the collection of intelligence on Islamist
movements," a Niger government source told Reuters.
In
Washington a diplomatic source told the Guardian that the recently
signed deal, known as a "status of forces" agreement, was
very broad. "There are no constraints to military-to-military
co-operation within the agreement," the source said.
The
deal with Niger had been under negotiation for some time but had got
a sudden burst of urgency after the dramatic events following the
French intervention in Mali. Though French-led forces have swept
militants from key cities in northern Mali, the conflict has focused
diplomatic efforts on the security threat posed by Islamist groups in
the vast wilderness of the Sahel and Sahara.
It
is believed that the US only currently desires surveillance drones to
be deployed to Niger though the agreement could pave the way for more
aggressive armed drones in the future. A spokesman for the Pentagon
did not return requests for clarification by email and telephone.
The
move would be the latest in a gradual expansion of American
surveillance drones in Africa, which have so far been operated from
Burkina Faso, Ethiopia and Djibouti in the Horn of Africa. It would
represent an acknowledgement that the north and west African regions
are becoming a key battleground in the fight against Islamist groups.
Aside from the conflict in Mali, Nigeria is plagued by violent
Islamists extremists in its northern provinces and Algeria recently
saw a high-profile and bloody attack on western workers at an oil
industry facility.
US
military consultant Robert Caruso said that any base in Niger would
probably be similar to the one already in Burkina Faso and use a
variety of manned and unmanned craft to carry out spying and
monitoring missions. Caruso said it would make up for a lack of human
intelligence in the region.
"The
reason we are having to push so many drones to the Sahel is because
we don't have any human intelligence in the region – either through
friendly countries providing it, or through espionage," said
Caruso. "We should have humans on the ground, but we don't. When
it comes to Mali, US policymakers really don't know what's going on."
However,
the use of drones, even if just on surveillance missions, is
controversial. American drone strikes have been used to deadly effect
in countries such as Pakistan, Yemen, Afghanistan and Somalia but
have caused outrage among civil liberties groups over the secrecy
that surrounds their operation and the high incidence of civilian
casualties. The London-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism has
monitored American drone strikes all around the world and calculates
that in Pakistan alone there have been some 362 strikes since 2004.
They are estimated to have killed up to 3,461 suspected militants in
the country and as many as 891 civilians.
Due
to the US's broad definition of "militant", many experts
believe the number of dead civilians may be much higher. But despite
the controversy, President Barack Obama has made the use of drones
one of the centrepieces of his national security strategy, overseeing
a huge increase in their deployment.
If
the use of drones in the Sahel did escalate beyond simple
surveillance and into active strikes, some experts warn that the US
risks a considerable backlash.
"The
use of drone strikes in the Sahel would become very problematic,"
said one senior diplomatic source, who did not want to be named.
"There
are already serious issues with identification of targets and
reliability with drones elsewhere, even in Pakistan, where the CIA
has a network of informants. But in north Africa they have no idea
who they are dealing with whatsoever."
The
source added that there was a paucity of intelligence as to who
exactly US forces would be targeting when it came to local Islamic
groups. "The US has no one integrated into these organisations.
Intelligence is extremely poor.
"These
groups and subgroups and splinter groups are capable of division at a
moment's notice. You might know something about one group but you
know nothing about the other. It is an extremely unstable situation,"
the source said.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.