Climate
Change & Human Trafficking
A
destroyed environment is often the perfect environment for modern-day
slavery
2
February, 2012
Environment is
often brought up at conferences and in documentaries about human
trafficking, but (and especially in the United States) it’s nearly
always used synonymously with “factors” or “conditions” that
may give rise to the crime. Sustainability is
discussed as well, but it’s always in the context of creating
lost-lasting jobs to help break the chains of the poverty that
increases a person’s susceptibility to being
trafficked. Recycled andreusable are
terms used to describe how, unlike in the drug trade, the same human
being can be sold repeatedly. In the United States the language of
environmentalism is constantly used when it comes to human
trafficking, but rarely in the context of the actual physical
environment. It’s time for this to change.
For
the majority of the world – from poor farmers and fisherman whose
families have for centuries survived due purely to their
hypersensitivity to their environment, to elite scientists spanning
nearly every discipline – climate change and the knowledge that
much of it is man-made is understood with the same certainty as
gravity.
While
standing in the flooded floors of thatched-roof huts in Bangladesh,
for example, I’ve listened as parents who didn’t even have the
money to add vegetables to their once-daily rice rations talked
adamantly to their children about how climate change and
environmental disasters increase the likelihood that someone comes to
try to take them or that they themselves may be more willing to take
a risk and trust someone promising a job outside of the impacted
area. Young
Power in Social Action, the premier social development
organization in Chittagong and perhaps throughout the entire country,
views climate change and situations within the physical environment
as perhaps the greatest risk factor in regards to human trafficking.
Yet in the US climate change is still somehow so controversial that
it was termed The
Great Unmentionable during the 2012 presidential campaigns.
We aren’t even to the point of being able to talk about climate
change, let alone its impact on human trafficking, a crime that
President Obama has called “one
of the great human rights causes of our time.”
A
natural disaster or an otherwise unpredictable environmental event
can in an instant displace or otherwise make vulnerable not only a
community, but millions of people. Entire countries. While it’s
wrong to attribute every such event to something man-made, it’s
equally wrong to overlook the many links between the environment, the
climate and the crime. Vulnerable means
not just to starvation and poverty, dengue or malaria, but to
exploitation by other human beings. In a recent piece for The
Washington Times titled,
“Natural
disaster throws children into the arms of pedophiles,” Jerome
Elam explored one such linkage:
The 9.0 magnitude earthquake had arisen from the floor of the Indian Ocean to trigger one of the most devastating natural disasters in recorded history. The impact of the Tsunami took an incredible toll on human life.
Beneath this human tragedy, an even more horrifying tragedy lurked within the shadows. As relief workers and supplies began to flow into the torn and ravaged countryside, customs officials made a shocking discovery. Twenty pedophiles were apprehended as they attempted to board a plane. Their destination included the countries of Indonesia and Thailand where sick and injured children wandered alone and separated from their families. Nature had created a paradise for child molesters whose only intention was to target young children for fulfillment of their deepest perversion while shrouded by the chaos around them.
In Linking
Human Rights and the Environment, Romina Picollotti writes:
Today more than ever, society has come to recognize that the anthropogenic destruction of our planet’s sustainable biodiversity negatively impacts humankind, placing human life at risk. The cause-and effect relationship that exists between environmental collapse and the subsequent risk to our existence can no longer be ignored.
We
are perhaps more trained to see the links between disease and
enviro-economic conditions – see Gold
boom challenging anti-malaria fight, for one recent example –
but as the fight against human trafficking continues to grow I am
asking everyone involved in the fight to thoroughly research and
begin to accept that (1) climate change does exist and that (2) our
physical environment provides perhaps just as much fuel for human
trafficking to grow as any other risk factor. We accept and talk at
great length about how the economy is directly linked to human
trafficking, but perhaps we are missing the cause prior: the
environment that enables or disables the working of an economy in the
first place.
Economic
growth may be slower if we take the environment into account, but it
will no doubt be more sustainable and in this sustainability will
undoubtedly be human safety. There’s much truth and application in
environmental activist Guy
McPherson‘s quote:
“If
you think the economy is more important than the environment, try
holding your breath while counting your money.”
About
Cameron Conaway
Cameron
Conaway is
the Social Justice Editor of The Good Men Project. An
award-winning author, he was the 2007-2009 Poet-in-Residence at the
University of Arizona’s MFA Creative Writing Program. In 2007 he
graduated from Penn State with a dual Criminal Justice/English major.
His work has appeared or been reviewed in ESPN, The
Huffington Post, Rattle, Sherdog, Cosmo, Teach
Magazine, The Australian, Ottawa Arts Review and
elsewhere. Tweet him: @CameronConaway.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.