Charles
Hugh Smith
8
November, 2012
The
Japanese model of incrementally perfecting consumer technologies may
well have have reached marginal returns.
This
apparently simple question offers profound insights into the dynamics
of individuals, households, enterprises and nation-states. If we
answer this question honestly, it establishes a "road map"
of what must be in place before a progression from here to a more
sustainable future ("there") can take place.
Individuals,
households, enterprises and nations can have goals--where they want
to be in the future--but to get there, they need to construct the
necessary foundation of values, processes, skillsets, networks,
practical experience and capital.
Since
my partner and I built about 100 houses back in the mid-1980s, I see
building a house as a useful analogy for getting from here to there:
each step requires different tools, skills, experience and sufficient
capital invested to get to the next phase. If you don't have all of
these in hand for each step, the goal of completing the house will
remain a fantasy.
As
correspondent Mark G. recently observed in an
email, "hyper-centralized entities are institutionally
incapable of adopting decentralized solutions." I
immediately thought of the Federal Reserve, which has responded to a
crisis of centralized "too big to fail" banks holding
phantom collateral to support massive leverage and debt with
increasingly centralized actions to recapitalize those same
centralized banks.
The
Federal Reserve is incapable of overseeing a decentralized economy;
it has responded to the insolvency of our centralized banking sector
by increasing counterproductive central planning (zero interest rate
policy, money-laundering dodgy mortgages, monetizing Federal debt,
etc.).
There
is no way the Fed's policies are going to get the nation from here
(centralized stagnation) to there (sustainable prosperity).
It's
a profound question when answered honestly: Do we have what
it takes to get from here to there? For most of the world's economies
and societies, the answer is a resounding "no."
The
U.S. Status Quo is as intellectually bankrupt as it is financially
bankrupt. Our "leadership" cluelessly clings to the only
model they know: incentivize "consumers" into borrowing
more money to buy more "stuff" from China, in the
magical-thinking belief this churn will somehow lead to sustainable
"growth." This is akin to handing a parched alcoholic a
fresh bottle of whiskey to wean him of his addiction.
That
model isn't going to get us from here to there.
Since
Gordon T. Long and I were recently discussing Lessons
From Japan (video), let's ask: does Japan have what it takes
to get from here (fiscal-cliff stagnation) to there (sustainable
growth)?
I
recently presented a multi-part look at Japan's economy and society:
Narcissism,
Consumerism and the End of Growth
Japan and the Exhaustion of Consumerism
The Hidden Cost of the "New Economy": New-Type Depression
The Future of America Is Japan: Stagnation
The Future of America Is Japan: Runaway Deficits, Runaway Debts
Japan and the Exhaustion of Consumerism
The Hidden Cost of the "New Economy": New-Type Depression
The Future of America Is Japan: Stagnation
The Future of America Is Japan: Runaway Deficits, Runaway Debts
The
short answer is no, Japan does not have what it takes to exit
stagnation. After 20+ years of extend-and-pretend Keynesian
Cargo-Cult "stimulus" borrowing and QE, Japan has managed
to construct:
1.
Bridges to nowhere (make-work projects for the powerful construction
lobby)
2.
An unprecedented fiscal cliff (interest on the debt and Social
Security are 114% of tax revenues--oh yeah, that's sustainable)
3.
A demographic cliff as having children is increasingly burdensome and
the "long hours prove you're worthy" work culture deprive
children of their fathers
4.
An export-based economy that is now running structural deficits
5.
A sclerotic, ruled-by-vested-interests Central State in the grip of
intrinsically corrupt political parties
6.
A revolving-door prime ministry with a new prime minister every year
or so
7.
Global corporations that have lost their edge (when was the last time
you saw Sony or Toshiba on a hot new electronics device? It's all
Apple, Samsung and Google)
8.
An undeclared but very real trade war with China (Japanese brand auto
sales have plummeted by 20+% in China, global auto makers' last best
market) China,
Japan and the Senkaku Islands: The Roots of Conflict Go Back to
1274 (September 25, 2012)
9.
An immigration policy that restricts the very workforce Japan needs
to offset its rapidly aging population.
(During
my last visit, we stayed for a few days in an apartment owned by a
friend's parents. The Japanese Police knocked on the door to check on
the whereabouts and status of the previous residents, workers from
Korea. Imagine the police in the U.S. keeping close tabs on every
"foreign born worker." Maybe this is a make-work project in
low-crime Japan, but it does suggest that immigrants are viewed as
"other" their entire time in Japan. How appealing is that
to immigrants?)
10.
Innovation in Japan has atrophied to specialized techno-gimmicks,
materials and biomedical research with unknown commercial
applications. Yes, it remains a high-tech research dynamo, but
without commercial applications, thousands of patents come to naught.
The
Japanese model of incrementally perfecting consumer technologies may
well have have reached marginal returns. Japan's reliance on the auto
and machine tools industries is also creating a drag, as these once
fast-growing sectors have reached the stagnation phase as China's
growth matures. The notion that everyone wants a car is also on an
S-curve as miles driven and auto ownership decline across the
developed world.
There
is a subdued but worried debate in Japan over many of these
issues. Clearly, what worked in the postwar boom era from
1949 to 1989--forty years--no longer works, and indeed is now
counterproductive.
The
MITI model of deeply interconnected government agencies, banks and
corporations that got Japan from "postwar ruins" to
"advanced, wealthy democracy" is not enough to get Japan
from here (stagnation and social recession) to there (a rejuvenated
society that encourages and enables parenthood and sustainable
growth).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.