Haaretz
provides some background into Israeli in-fighting over ending the
Gaza onslaught. Maybe Bibi isn't as tough as he may seem?
Behind
the scenes of Israel's decision to accept Gaza truce
Barak
wanted to end it, Lieberman demanded a ground invasion, and Netanyahu
vacillated. Behind the scenes of the Forum of Three's meetings on the
Gaza operation
22
November, 2012
The
Israeli decision to accept the Egyptian-brokered cease-fire deal was
made after two days of fierce disputes among the triumverate of top
Israeli ministers that led the operation in Gaza, as well as the
broader forum of nine.
Since
Operation Pillar of Defense was launched last Wednesday night, the
Forum of Three - comprising Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,
Defense Minister Ehud Barak and Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman -
met every evening to discuss the continued warfare, and to authorize
operational plans and the targets that would be attacked the day
after. In the last three days, most of the discussions dealt with the
Egyptian efforts at reaching a cease-fire.
At
Tuesday's meeting, just before U.S Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
arrived, it became clear to Israel that the principles for a
cease-fire being proposed by Egypt were much closer to Hamas'
positions than to its own. The assumption voiced by intelligence
officials at the triumvirate meeting was that, contrary to the
situation during Mubarak's era, the Egyptians are aligning with Hamas
and trying to provide it with achievements.
This
triggered an acerbic dispute between Barak and Lieberman. The defense
minister, opposed to an expansion of the operation, thought Israel
should respond positively to Egypt's proposal for a cease-fire and
end the operation. Barak said at the meeting that the precise wording
of the Egyptian draft is not important since the end of fighting and
Israel's power of deterrence would be tested by the reality on the
ground.
"A
day after the cease-fire, no one will remember what is written in
that draft. The only thing that will be tested is the blow Hamas
suffered," Barak told Netanyahu and Lieberman. "We can put
off the Egyptian proposal and go for a precarious ground incursion of
Gaza, but at the end of the day, we may end up with the same exact
result."
Lieberman,
on the other hand, presented a much harder stance, claiming that the
operation until now did not sufficiently reinforce Israel's power of
deterrence. The foreign minister advocated for a ground incursion in
Gaza, even if limited, in order to show Hamas that Israel is not
fearful of entering the Strip.
For
the duration of the last few days, Netanyahu constantly vacillated
between the positions held by Barak and Lieberman. On the one hand,
he expressed doubts about a ground invasion that could get messy,
both operationally and politically. On the other hand, the prime
minister was worried that the cease-fire agreement would make
Israel's effort at building up deterrence against Hamas look like a
failure.
The
forum's disputes, together with the images from the damaged building
in Rishon Letzion that suffered a direct rocket hit, led Israel's
leader to delay the cease-fire agreement by a day. The Israeli side
began revealing pessimism about the chances of reaching an
Egyptian-mediated understanding and a few of Israel's nine ministers
even suggested that Israel declare a unilateral cease-fire. "If
Hamas continues firing after we call it, we'll have the international
legitimacy for a ground incursion," one of the ministers said.
Clinton
arrived to the Prime Minister's Office on Tuesday evening straight
from the airport, and was immediately informed of Israel's
reservations. Clinton and her staff left Netanyahu's office at 2:00
A.M., but continued making phone calls to Cairo and Washington until
4:00 A.M.
During
breakfast with United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon at a
Jerusalem hotel, Clinton looked tired, but optimistic. She made a
quick trip to Ramallah and from there returned to Jerusalem for
another meeting with Nentanyahu, Barak, and Lieberman, before heading
for Cairo. The three Israeli ministers requested that she pressure
Egypt to present a more balanced cease-fire agreement.
During
both her meetings with Netanyahu, Clinton activated her power of
persuasion in order to make clear to the Israeli premier that
adopting the Egyptian draft was the best course of action. U.S.
President Barack Obama also pushed the issue in a few telephone calls
with the Israeli prime minister.
The
American message was clear: Adopting Egypt's cease-fire draft was
much the preferred choice. At the same time, Obama and Clinton
promised Netanyahu incentives in the form of increased U.S. pressure
on Egypt regarding weapons smuggling to Gaza, and a commitment to
provide more funds for additional Iron Dome missile defense systems.
At
the start of the Forum of Nine's meeting on Wednesday afternoon,
Netanyahu was already leaning towards Barak's position. However,
during the meeting there was a bitter argument about Egypt's draft.
Finance
Minister Yuval Steinitz and Interior Minister Eli Yishai both
advocated for intensifying the operation in Gaza. Steinitz said there
should be a ground invasion with the goal of overthrowing Hamas,
while Yishai argued that Israel should continue to strike all
possible targets in Gaza by air.
Barak,
together with ministers Dan Meridor and Benny Begin, expressed fierce
opposition to Steinitz and Yishai. At one point Netanyahu openly
sided with those advocating for the cease-fire agreement, while
Lieberman insisted Steinitz had the right idea.
Ultimately,
Lieberman also made clear that there was no choice but to accept the
cease-fire. "The decision is simple," the foreign minister
said at the Forum of Nine meeting. "Rabin said that if they fire
from Gaza, we will reoccupy, but this is obviously difficult. There
are a lot of emotions going around, and I identified with the finance
minister, but reality is more complex."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.