Afghanistan
'facing civil war when US troops leave'
Afghanistan
will slide back into civil war when American troops leave, according
to a key insurgent negotiator who says peace talks now have no chance
of success.
14
September, 2012
Ghairat
Baheer, a senior figure in Hizb-i-Islami who has held three meetings
with US officials in Kabul, told The Daily Telegraph that last week's
decision by Hillary Clinton to declare the Haqqani network, an
insurgent group linked to the Taliban, has killed off hopes of a
negotiated settlement.
He
said the withdrawal of US combat troops by the end of 2014 would
leave Afghan forces ill-equipped to withstand the combined threat of
insurgent groups.
"The
Americans have their calculation that if it bring down expenses the
lowest level but I don't think the national army and national police
will be able to resist. They don't have the morale," he said.
"It will lead to civil war."
His
prediction of "chaos" contradicts an upbeat assessment
delivered by Philip Hammond, the Defence Secretary, who said British
troops may leave sooner than the end of 2014.
In
an interview with the Guardian he claimed commanders were "surprised
by the extent to which they have been able to draw back and leave the
Afghans to take the lion's share of the combat role".
The
spectre of civil war is the worst case scenario envisaged by Nato
commanders as they gradually hand over responsibility for security to
Afghan forces. The strategy is coupled with moves to engage Taliban
leaders in talks.
Earlier
this week, General John Allen, commander of Nato-led troops in the
country, said more than three quarters of the population now lived in
areas where local forces had taken the lead for security. And this
week the Kabul government took control of Bagram prison – long seen
as a symbol of American brutality and contempt for justice by locals
– in a move hailed as a victory for Afghan sovereignty. Dr Baheer,
who spent six years held by US forces at different prisons including
Bagram, has met American officials three times in Kabul as part of a
nascent peace process, which he now says holds no prospect of
progress.
However,
now he says Hizb-i-Islami has ended its involvement in talks with the
Afghan government because of its close alliance with the US. He said
that blacklisting the Haqqani network had made it impossible for the
Taliban to negotiate.
"It
is OK to renounce al-Qaeda but how can they renounce Haqqani, when he
and his people are part of the Taliban? This breaks all negotiations
and chance of settlement," he said.
Instead
he insisted that a national government, including the Taliban and
Hizb-i-Islami, be established to represent all of Afghanistan.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.