The
Desert Southwest Is Burping Methane Like Nobody’s Business
By
Eric Holthaus
9
October, 2014
Over
the next decade or so, our
collective climatic future will
be won or lost based on how aggressively the world decides to limit
greenhouse gas emissions.
Increasingly,
the greenhouse gas that could provide humanity’s biggest bang for
its climate change tackling buck isn’t carbon dioxide—it’s
methane.
For the first time, a team of scientists have observed the effects of
natural gas extraction—which is 95-98 percent methane—from space.
Using
satellite data, a study published
Thursday finds a surprising methane hotspot: New Mexico’s San Juan
Basin, an area that some believe is primed
for its own oil and gas boom just
like the one a few years ago in the Bakken formation of western North
Dakota.
“It's
the largest signal we saw in the continental United States,” said
lead author Eric Kort, a professor at the University of Michigan. I
reached Kort by phone Thursday.
Methane
has a shorter residence time in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide,
but once it’s up there, it’s a doozy. Pound for pound, methane
is 20
times more effectiveat
trapping the sun’s heat as carbon dioxide.
Since
2007, global methane emissions have steadily increased, but
scientists aren’t sure exactly why. They’ve narrowed down the
possible main sources to burps
from a warming Arctic,
an uptick in emissions from tropical
wetlands,
and human agriculture and fossil fuel extraction. The recent rise
overlaps with the American boom in fracking in
places like North Dakota,
but also to an increase in Arctic temperatures.
Along
with co-authors from NASA and the Department of Energy, Kort analyzed
seven years of methane concentrations from the space-based
high-resolution (and impressively named) SCanning Imaging Absorption
SpectroMeter for Atmospheric CHartographY (SCIAMACHY), which is
accurate enough to track anomalies back to their source regions.
The
San Juan Basin blip that Kort’s team found showed up during the
entire seven-year dataset, and in all seasons—evidence that its
source was likely unnatural. Intrigued by this finding, the authors
decided to explore further.
In
2012, using ground-based measurements, they were able to track the
anomaly back to an unconventional technique called coalbed
methane extraction that’s
been practiced for decades in the region.
However,
in order to justify the anomalous atmospheric concentrations they
were detecting, Kort’s team calculated the amount of methane
emanating from these sites must be enormous: 590,000 tons per year,
or about 10 percent of the EPA’s estimate of total U.S. emissions
from natural gas production, and about three-and-a-half times higher
than previous estimates in this region.
For
perspective, Kort’s analysis shows the San Juan Basin may already
be producing methane emissions roughly equivalent to the entire oil,
gas, and coal industry in the United Kingdom. Said Kort,
“it is a pretty impressive number from such a small spatial
region.”
Earlier
this year, the Obama administration announced an
offensive on methane that
relies primarily on voluntary compliance by the agriculture and
energy industries. However, in September, the Department of
Energy paved
the way for
increased natural gas exports at port facilities on the Gulf Coast,
an example of the administration’s on-again-off-again commitment
to making
hard choices in
favor of climate stability.
Kort’s
not done examining the San Juan Basin. The National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration is supporting his research team to conduct
an aerial survey of the region in an attempt to further track down
individual point sources of methane.
Natalia Shakhova talks about her work and the forces that stand in the way of her work.
Natalia Shakhova talks about her work and the forces that stand in the way of her work.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.