Life
has changed for Americans – once again. Not,I suspect, in the way
that this mainstream article would have us believe
Why
Boston Bombings Might Be Scarier Than 9/11
Killing
Americans at play resonates differently than attacks on economic and
military targets
16
April, 2013
Call
it “terrorism” if a label helps you make sense of this madness.
Find who did it and squash him—or them—with what President Obama
called “the full weight of justice.” But in the broad scheme of
things, such loose ends matter less than this: Life in America
changed with the Boston Marathon bombings—again, and as with past
attacks, for the much worse.
The
Oklahoma City bombing in April 1995 and the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks
were knee-buckling blows that led to an obsession over domestic
security and foreign wars that will mark—and mar—our generation.
The last mass terrorist assault on U.S. soil was carried out by Maj.
Nidal M. Hassan, an Army psychiatrist with loose connections to
al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula, who fatally shot 13 people and
wounded 30 more at Fort Hood, Texas, in November 2009.
There
were attacks thwarted by the swelling ranks of federal police: The
so-called shoe bomber, Richard Reid; an attempt to bomb the New York
City subway system in 2009; and an unexploded car bomb in Times
Square in 2010.
Boston
is another bridge too far. The Boston Marathon and its competitors
reflect the best of America—always striving, forever resilient,
and, as measured by population and cultural significance, enormous.
You
might say it’s unfair to compare Boston’s relatively low death
toll to 9/11 and Oklahoma City, much less to the thousands of
casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as the daily total of gun
deaths on U.S. streets.
But
the Boston attack is notable not for the number of deaths, but for
its social significance. It’s one thing—a dastardly, evil
thing—to strike symbols of economic and military power. It’s
another to hit the heart of America. Death at the finish line in
Boston makes every place (and everybody) less secure.
Malls.
Churches.
Schools.
Ask
a mother or father who lived in Washington from 2001-02 what was more
terrorizing to your family: The 9/11 attacks or the “Beltway
sniper”? Many will say the sniper. Two men were later charged in
the horrifyingly random killings of 10 people in several locations
throughout the Washington area. The dead and injured included a
39-year-old man shot while cutting grass, a 54-year-old part-time
taxi driver shot while pumping gas, a 34-year-old babysitter and
housekeeper shot while reading a book on a bench, and a 13-year-old
boy shot while entering his middle school.
Parents
kept their kids home from school or formed human barricades at
“drop-off” spots. Malls emptied. For three Sundays, I sat in a
back pew with my family and looked for terrorists among my fellow
parishioners.
From
the nation's founding, America has had two sharply delineated lives:
one public and one private. The latter is meant to be safe and
sacrosanct, part of what Thomas Jefferson called "the pursuit of
Happiness." The public life is rowdy and partisan, even violent
as reflected in the Civil War. "What happened in Boston,"
said Meg Mott, professor of politics at Marlboro College in Vermont,
"is that the private life got blown up and hit deep in the heart
of our bifurcated American lives. The lines were blurred, and that's
scary."
They
targeted life. They targeted liberty. Now somebody has attacked
pursuit of happiness.
In
those ugly months after 9/11, we feared there would be a “new
normal” for America – that no place and nobody would feel safe
again, that our churches, schools, malls as well as arenas and other
places of great gathering would be killing fields. Those fears were
not realized, not right away. Does the nightmare begin with Boston?
Today,
officials identified the 8-year-old boy killed at the finish line.
His name was Martin Richard. He left a world unworthy of him.

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.