-->Chinese Think Tank: "Conflict With Japan Inevitable"
31
December, 2012
Shinzo
Abe's re-election on the basis of his monetary policy aggression
plans have sent the JPY reeling (as he hoped for) and the NKY soaring
- but it is his more aggressive perspective on patriotism that could
lead to far greater problems. As the Chinese Academy of Social
Sciences recently noted,all eyes are fixed on Abe as "Japan’s
nationalization of the Diaoyu Islands destroyed the framework for
keeping a balance, which means ‘shelving a conflict',"
a Chinese diplomatic source said, adding that "China has no
political methods to return the situation to the
(pre-nationalization) state. Therefore, there are no other ways
except for looking for a new framework." As a precondition for
establishing the framework, an executive of the think tank said,
"Prime
Minister Shinzo Abe should not take actions that heighten the
tensions further. It is the same as a game of go. If Japan escalates
the conflict, China will be prepared to respond to the move."
As a result, Japan-China relations will enter into a highly volatile
period, ruining any hope of a resurgence in Japan's real economy, and
more worryingly, the think-tank concludes, China's
conflict with Japan is inevitable.
With the rise of China as Asia's leading economic power, a Chinese government think tank says the nation's conflict with Japan over the Senkaku Islands is inevitable at a time when its bilateral relations are changing as a consequence.
The Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS) also said in its annual report that the two countries’ relationship will enter into a highly unstable period.
While thinking that the conflict over the islands could be prolonged, China is now paying attention to what action the new Japanese government, headed by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, will take.
The “report on the development of the Asia-Pacific region” points out that China’s rapid development is raising anxieties in surrounding nations, forcing them into taking precautions and requiring them to accept the “readjustment” of the power balance.
As for the Senkaku Islands, the report explained that Japan’s right-wing groups, which have gained strength through the country’s two decades of a sluggish economy called “the lost 20 years,” regarded U.S. policy of “pivoting to Asia” as the best opportunity to nationalize the islands. In September, Japan purchased three of the five Senkaku Islands, called the Diaoyu Islands in China, from a private landowner.
Until the new power balance is established in the fields of politics and economics, prolongation of the conflict is inevitable. As a result, Japan-China relations will enter into a highly volatile period, the report said.
“Japan’s nationalization of the Diaoyu Islands destroyed the framework for keeping a balance, which means ‘shelving a conflict,’ ” a Chinese diplomatic source said.
“China has no political methods to return the situation to the (pre-nationalization) state. Therefore, there are no other ways except for looking for a new framework,” the source said.
In a symposium held on Dec. 28, Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Zhang Zhijun said, “China and Japan should find crisis management methods through dialogue.”
With the comment, Zhang showed willingness to establish a framework for preventing possible clashes between vessels or aircraft around the Senkaku Islands from escalating into a military conflict.
As a precondition for establishing the framework, an executive of a think tank said, “Prime Minister Shinzo Abe should not take actions that heighten the tensions further.”
Since the days before Dec. 26 when the Abe government was formed, Beijing has been paying close attention to Abe’s hard-line remarks, such as stationing public servants on the Senkaku Islands or making visits to Yasukuni Shrine, which honors not only Japanese war dead, but also Class-A war criminals.
“It is the same as a game of go. If Japan escalates the conflict, China will be prepared to respond to the move,” the executive said.
Gao Hong, deputy director of the CASS’s Institute of Japanese Studies, said, “It is necessary for Japan-China relations to return to the original point of the two countries seeking long-term profits in their relationship.”
China's
Newest And Deadliest Warship Has Entered The South China Sea
Robert
Johnson
31
December, 2012
As
five other countries claim ownership of the Spratly Islands in the
South China Sea, and its supposed billions in oil and gas deposits,
China's backing its claim by sending the newest warship it has to the
region.
The
Taiwan-owned China Times reports the Liuzhou Type 054A warship
entered the South China Sea Fleet of China's PLA Navy, making it the
sixth 054 warship in the area.
Though
the Type 054A is not a new design, this most recently commissioned
vessel will have the latest technological advantages.
From
China Times:
Liuzhou
is currently considered one of China's most advanced surface combat
Type 054A vessels. It has a stealthy hull design with sloped surfaces
and radar absorbent materials. Equipped with a medium-range air
defense missile system, the vessel is capable of destroying air
targets at a distance up to 50 km. Although it is not as lethal as
the Russian-built Sovremenny class and domestic destroyers, the new
frigate still serves well as a multi-role warship in the Chinese
fleet.
Among
all 16 frigates in the same class and currently in the service of the
PLA Navy, Liuzhou is the newest addition. Since Liuzhou is commanded
by the South Sea Fleet, which is based in Zhanjiang of Guangdong
province, analysts believe that its primary mission is to protect
Chinese interests in the disputed South China Sea. The mainland and
five other countries — Taiwan, Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia
and Brunei — have competing claims to the region's islands and
atolls.
The
Liuzhou's deployment comes days after the U.S. vowed to increase its
military presence in the Philippines and China's ensuing outrage over
the decision.
The
warship carries an array of sophisticated weapons including
anti-submarine ordnance and stealth features allowing it to evade
radar and move undetected.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.