World
Economy Entering Into Financial Hurricane Season
By
Anatole Kaletsky
7
September, 2012
The
North Atlantic hurricane season runs from mid-August to October, with
a strong peak in storm activity around the middle of September. A
less familiar but even more destructive pattern of disturbances is
the financial hurricane season, which coincides with the
meteorological one almost to the day.
Most
of the great financial crises of modern history have occurred in the
two months from mid-August: the Wall Street crashes of Oct. 22, 1907,
Oct. 24, 1929, and Oct. 19, 1987; Britain’s abandonment of the gold
standard on Sept. 19, 1931; the postwar sterling devaluation on Sept.
19, 1949; the collapse of the Bretton Woods global monetary system on
Aug. 15, 1971; the Mexican default that triggered the Third World
debt crisis on Aug. 20, 1982; the breakup of the European
exchange-rate mechanism on Sept. 16, 1992; the Russian default on
Aug. 17, 1998, the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers on Sept. 15. 2008 –
and this list could go on.
The
coincidence between financial and meteorological hurricanes may not
be entirely fortuitous. The global economy, like the world’s
atmosphere, is a finely balanced complex system.
In
such systems, small perturbations can accumulate to trigger big
effects. And just as the meteorological tipping points tend to occur
when autumn air circulation starts to disrupt the humid air
accumulated in the summer doldrums, something similar seems to happen
to financial markets when trading becalmed by the summer holidays
returns to normal. The result can be sudden and violent reaction to
events accumulated over the summer that markets had seemed to ignore.
The
world economy does not, of course, experience hurricanes with the
same regularity as the Caribbean. But when big events happen over the
summer, financial disturbances become quite probable in the fall.
This is probably the reason why September has historically been the
worst month of the year for stock market performance. In fact,
September is the only month in which Wall Street prices have, on
average, declined since the 1920s.
The
question now is whether the world economy has already adjusted to the
potentially disruptive and disappointing economic events of the
summer, or whether the summer doldrums in financial trading were
merely a calm before the storm.
The
testing period begins this week with Thursday’s ECB meeting and
Friday’s U.S. job figures. Further challenges to financial
confidence are likely from the German constitutional court verdict on
euro bailouts on Wednesday and the Federal Reserve decision on
quantitative easing the following day.
But
rather than focusing again on these familiar issues, it is worth
considering some worrying developments recently in other parts of the
world. In China, economic activity has failed to accelerate as
expected, despite repeated attempts at monetary and fiscal stimulus.
This could mean simply that the government and the central bank have
not yet done enough. It is possible, however, that the Chinese
economy has become too complex to be managed and fine-tuned as
effectively as in the past. Or perhaps the disappointing results of
Chinese stimulus thus far reflect a broader failure of monetary
policy, which is becoming evident around the world.
Recent
disappointments in Britain support the latter interpretation. The
British economy has enjoyed no growth for two years now, since David
Cameron’s government decided on a radical experiment in fiscal
belt-tightening, hoping that monetary expansion would offset the
deflationary effects. This week Cameron responded to the failure of
this experiment by sacking many of his ministers and announcing a new
“pro-growth” strategy.
On
closer inspection, however, this “new” policy was simply doubling
down on the one that failed. The growth measures consist mainly of
promises to build unpopular new airports and railways from 2015
onwards. Meanwhile, the government will continue to cut spending and
raise taxes, hoping that further monetary handouts to banks and bond
investors will revive growth. The experience of the past four years
suggests this is unlikely.
But
if Britain cannot revive its economy with monetary easing, why should
better results be expected from the Fed? Ben Bernanke, in last week’s
Jackson Hole speech, effectively promised to keep pumping money into
the U.S. bond markets until he achieved a strong economic recovery.
But given that QE has failed to deliver full employment in 2010-12,
why should it work any better in 2013?
Pumping
money into the banks was a very effective emergency measure to
prevent the collapse of the U.S. and British financial systems –
and it could be equally effective in preventing the breakup of the
euro, if only the German government would permit it. But financial
stability and economic growth are different problems, and they may
require different solutions. Unfortunately policymakers do not seem
to understand this distinction. In the U.S. and Britain they refuse
to acknowledge that printing money can ever be counterproductive. In
Germany, by contrast, they refuse to accept that printing money can
ever work.
Which
brings us finally to the most important source of instability that
threatens a financial hurricane this autumn – the impending clash
between the ECB, Germany and the rest of the euro zone. This
conflict, to which I will return next week, is certain to intensify
between now and the next European summit on Oct. 19 – a date still
well within the financial hurricane season.
Austerity
Severity: 'Talks give little hope as debts mount'
RT,
6 September, 2012
The
European Central Bank has a new anti-crisis plan. It will buy bonds
from struggling Eurozone nations allowing the likes of Greece and
Spain to borrow even more cash cheaply.
It
comes as the heads of the EU's five leading economies are on a
merry-go-round of meetings. French President Francois Hollande is
talking with British PM David Cameron just two days after meeting
Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti. And the German Chancellor Angela
Merkel is in Madrid for a summit with Spanish leader Mariano Rajoy.
For
more on the subject RT talks to Carlos Delclos, a sociologist at
Pompeu Fabra University in Barcelona.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.