The
democratically-elected Environment Canterbury (Ecan) was sacked by
the central government because it didn't deliver the desired results
for the right-wing government.
Since
then (and the 2011 earthquake) there has been no democracy in
Christchurch
Democracy
on backburner for Canterbury?
The
future of Environment Canterbury will be revealed tomorrow.
NBR,
6
September, 2012
Minister
of local government David Carter and minister for the environment Amy
Adams are scheduled to make the announcement in the morning.
But
rather than returning the region to democracy, which many local
leaders say is needed more than ever, political sources suggest
National’s ministerial rule from Wellington will be extended.
A
fallback position would be a mix of elected and appointed members to
Ecan.
Councillors
were sacked in 2010 under the then environment minister Nick Smith,
who subsequently lost his post over the Bronwyn Pullar ACC affair.
Mr
Smith had commissioned former National minister Wyatt Creech to write
a report on the alleged shortcomings of Ecan over the slow resource
consent processing of a surge in applications from farmers seeking
water permits, much of it for dairying.
The
Creech report specifically stated the council was not dysfunctional,
although this description is frequently used by current ministers to
justify the councillors’ removal.
Mr
Smith went ahead, sacking elected councillors in April 2010 and
appointing commissioners to advance water allocation.
One
of NBR's Wellington sources says that she was aware a media statement
had already been drafted.
Her
information suggested that the government is leaning towards
extending the term of the existing commissioners who replaced the
sacked Ecan councillors.
She
also says that another government announcement timed for tomorrow
morning is designed to be a smokescreen to take attention away from
the Ecan announcement.
The
second media conference will announce the timetable of pending
infrastructure works.
Sources
within National say a super council like Auckland council is in the
offing for Canterbury.
Lane
Neave lawyer Duncan Webb says a super council would fit with
National’s outlook.
“It’s
about National’s view of business units and economies of scale. It
goes across all organisations, whether it’s state-owned
enterprises, universities or community groups.
“There’s
a different approach. It’s more decision-making than community
focused,” he says.
The
same approach is evident in the ministerial veto over Christchurch
city council affairs and the extraordinary powers of the Canterbury
Earthquake Recovery Authority to acquire land and dictate urban
planning with minimal allowance for appeals.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.