An
accelerating flight of deposits from banks in four European countries
is jeopardizing the renewal of economic growth and undermining a main
tenet of the common currency: an integrated financial system.
20
September, 2012
A
total of 326 billion euros ($425 billion) was pulled from banks in
Spain, Portugal, Ireland and Greece in the 12 months ended July 31,
according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The plight of Irish and
Greek lenders, which were bleeding cash in 2010, spread to Spain and
Portugal last year.
The
flight of deposits from the four countries coincides with an increase
of about 300 billion euros at lenders in seven nations considered the
core of the euro zone, including Germany and France, almost matching
the outflow. That’s leading to a fragmentation of credit and a
two-tiered banking system blocking economic recovery and blunting
European Central Bank policy in the third year of a sovereign-debt
crisis.
“Capital
flight is leading to the disintegration of the euro zone and
divergence between the periphery and the core,” said Alberto Gallo,
the London-based head of European credit research at Royal Bank of
Scotland Group Plc. “Companies pay 1 to 2 percentage points more to
borrow in the periphery. You can’t get growth to resume with such
divergence.”
Lending
Rates
The
erosion of deposits is forcing banks in those countries to pay more
to retain them -- as much as 5 percent in Greece. The higher funding
costs are reflected in lending rates to companies and consumers. The
average rate for new loans to non- financial corporations in July was
above 7 percent in Greece, 6.5 percent in Spain and 6.2 percent in
Italy, according to ECB data. It was 4 percent in Germany, France and
the Netherlands.
Some
of the decline in deposits is because German and French banks are
reducing their exposure. They cut lending to their counterparts in
the four peripheral countries plus Italy by $100 billion in the 12
months ended March 31, according to the latest data available from
the Bank for International Settlements. ECB data count interbank
lending as deposits, as well as money being held for corporations and
households.
Banks
in the core countries also have been reducing their holdings of
Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Irish and Greek government bonds. At
the same time, lenders in the periphery have been buying more of
their own governments’ debt. That has further contributed to the
fragmentation of credit along national lines, as banks collect
deposits from people and companies in their own countries and lend
internally.
IMF
Warning
Organizations
such as the International Monetary Fund have warned about the danger
of such fragmentation. Financial disintegration along national lines
“caps the benefits from economic and financial integration” that
underlie the common currency, the IMF wrote in an April report.
The
disintegration can fuel a cycle of deteriorating economic conditions
and weakening banks, said David Powell, a Bloomberg LP economist
based in London. The more banks pay for deposits the less profitable
some of their businesses are, he said. A Spanish lender that borrows
at 4 percent from depositors and is limited by Europe-wide interest
rates to charging only 2.5 percent for a mortgage is losing money.
“The
financial divergence is a symptom of the underlying economic
divergence, but they feed on each other, making it harder to break
out of,” Powell said. “Until companies and individuals are
convinced that the euro will survive, they won’t invest in the
periphery, and that will keep funds away.”
ECB
Loans
The
ECB has taken the place of depositors and other creditors who have
pulled money out over the past two years, largely through its
longer-term refinancing operation, known as LTRO. The Frankfurt-based
central bank was providing 820 billion euros to lenders in the five
countries at the end of July, data compiled by Bloomberg show. Irish
and Greek central banks loaned an additional 148 billion euros to
firms that couldn’t come up with enough collateral to meet ECB
requirements.
Because
central-bank financing is counted as a deposit from another financial
institution, the official data mask some of the deterioration.
Subtracting those amounts reveals a bigger flight from Spain,
Ireland, Portugal and Greece. For Italian banks, what appears as a 10
percent increase is actually a decrease of less than 1 percent.
When
financing by central banks isn’t counted, the data show that Greek
deposits declined by 42 billion euros, or 19 percent, in the 12
months through July. Spanish savings dropped 224 billion euros, or 10
percent; Ireland’s 37 billion, or 9 percent; Portugal’s 22
billion, or 8 percent.
Accelerating
Flight
The
pace of withdrawals has increased this year. Spanish bank deposits
fell 7 percent from the beginning of January through the end of July,
compared with a 4 percent drop the previous six months. The decline
in Portuguese savings accelerated to 6 percent from 1 percent, while
Irish deposits fell 10 percent compared with almost no change in the
last six months of 2011.
Banco
Santander SA (SAN), Spain’s largest bank, lost 6.3 percent of its
domestic deposits in July, according to data published by the
nation’s banking association. Savings at Banco Popular Espanol SA,
the sixth-biggest, fell 9.5 percent the same month.
Eurobank
Ergasias SA, Greece’s second-largest lender, lost 22 percent of its
customer deposits in the 12 months ended March 31, according to the
latest data available from the firm. Alpha Bank SA (ALPHA), the
country’s third-biggest, lost 26 percent of client savings during
that period.
The
ECB data include items such as deposits by securitization funds that
Spanish banks say they don’t rely on for financing their
businesses. Household and company deposits nationwide are stable if
financing from instruments such as commercial paper sold to retail
clients is included, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA (BBVA) said
in a Sept. 4 report.
Irish
Banks
Irish
government officials and bank executives say deposits at three
government-backed banks have stabilized after almost three years of
outflows. Bank of Ireland Plc, the largest lender, saw its customer
deposits rise by 11 percent in the year ended June 30, according to
regulatory filings. Ireland also hosts dozens of foreign institutions
that use Dublin as an offshore base to benefit from lower tax rates
and whose movements of funds would show up in the ECB’s Irish data.
Ireland
nationalized almost all of its domestic banks in 2010, forcing them
to recognize losses on real-estate lending, and injected 63 billion
euros to keep them alive. Spain has resisted a similar cleanup that
could cost several hundred billion euros, according to some
estimates. After agreeing to 100 billion euros of potential
assistance from the EU in June, the Spanish government still hasn’t
decided how much of that to tap or what to do with its troubled
lenders.
Plugging
Holes
ECB
cash may have plugged holes at lenders that otherwise would have had
to sell assets at fire-sale prices as they lost private financing.
The aid didn’t prevent funding costs from rising for the rest of
the banks’ borrowing, including deposits.
While
Italian lenders arrested the decline in deposits this year, they paid
a high price to do so, with average deposit rates jumping 50 percent
to 3.1 percent in July from a year earlier, ECB data show. That’s
more than the 2.4 percent paid by Spanish banks, whose deposit wars
were halted by a rate cap last year. Those limits were lifted last
month, and Spanish firms have begun raising interest rates on
deposits again.
The
average deposit cost at German banks in July was 1.5 percent. Two
years ago, Italian and German deposit rates were the same, at 1.3
percent.
Loan
Pricing
The
difference in funding costs is reflected in loan pricing. Italian
rates on consumer loans of less than one year, at 8.2 percent on
average, exceeded even those in Greece and Portugal, ECB data show.
Spanish consumers had to pay 7.3 percent to borrow from their banks,
compared with 4.5 percent for German borrowers.
Another
blow to financial integration is the localization of borrowing and
lending. Units of German, French and Dutch banks in Spain, Italy and
other peripheral countries also borrowed from the ECB to reduce the
need for funds from their parent companies. Deutsche Bank AG,
Germany’s largest bank, said last week it had cut the reliance of
units on financing by the Frankfurt-based firm 87 percent through ECB
loans.
While
the largest banks say they’re protecting themselves against
currency redenomination in case a country leaves the union, such
moves help exacerbate divisions between the periphery and the core. A
locally financed Deutsche Bank unit can’t make loans that reflect
the cheaper funding sources of its parent in Germany.
‘Backdoor
Bailout’
By
taking over the financing of weak banks, the ECB is in effect bailing
out their creditors in the core, according to Edward Harrison, an
analyst at Global Macro Advisors, an economic consulting firm in
Bethesda, Maryland. If Irish or Spanish lenders burdened with losses
from their nations’ housing busts were allowed to fail, German and
French banks would lose money on loans to financial institutions in
Europe’s periphery.
The
ECB’s latest plan to buy the sovereign bonds of some countries will
continue the trend of bailing out German and French banks, Harrison
said.
“The
leaders of the core countries won’t let the periphery countries
write down their debt because then they’d have to capitalize their
own banks losing money from those investments,” Harrison said.
“This is a good backdoor bailout of their banks, but it still
doesn’t solve the solvency issue of Spain or Italy.”
The
rescue shifts default risk from private shareholders of core banks to
the ECB and, in effect, to euro-area taxpayers. When Greece
restructured its debt earlier this year, so much of it already had
been transferred to the public that losses by European banks outside
Greece were cut in half. Because the ECB and other government lenders
wouldn’t take any losses, the debt load wasn’t reduced enough to
make it sustainable.
Bond
Yields
The
ECB’s offer to purchase Spanish and Italian government bonds -- if
those countries ask for help and agree to conditions imposed in
exchange for the assistance -- would reduce yields, which have fallen
in expectation of the move. Still, the purchases won’t bring down
borrowing costs for companies and consumers in those countries
because banks will continue to pay higher rates for their funding,
according to RBS’s Gallo.
Unlike
in the U.S., where the Federal Reserve’s buying of securities in
2009 and 2010 brought down mortgage rates immediately, there isn’t
as strong a connection in Europe between bond yields and loan rates,
Gallo said.
Increased
funding costs for Italian banks are purely a reflection of the
sovereign’s borrowing costs, not weakness in the banking system,
according to Bank of Italy Deputy Director General Salvatore Rossi.
When Italian government-bond yields decline, banks’ funding costs
should too, he said.
‘Vicious
Cycle’
“Our
banking system was in good shape before the crisis,” Rossi said in
an interview in New York. “If the spread goes down, credit-market
conditions would ease, contributing to halt a vicious cycle, which is
hampering economic activity.”
That
spread, the difference between the yields of Italian sovereigns and
the German bunds, fell to 342 basis points yesterday from a high of
536 in July. One basis point is 0.01 percentage point.
While
Italian banks are affected by their government’s debt overhang,
some increased funding costs result from a rising level of bad loans,
Gallo said. The ratio of nonperforming loans to total lending in
Italy has almost tripled since 2008 to 5.6 percent in May, Italian
Banking Association data show.
European
Union leaders have acknowledged the dangers of a two-tiered banking
system, which is accentuated by deposit flows from south to north and
diverging borrowing costs.
“We
cannot pursue price stability now when we have a fragmented euro
zone,” ECB President Mario Draghi told European lawmakers Sept. 3.
Banking
Union
Draghi
has said that the central bank’s plan to buy sovereign bonds
addresses the divisions. Euro-area leaders also have responded by
attempting to establish a banking union. Shared deposit guarantees, a
central regulator and a resolution mechanism for bad banks backed by
common funds from member states could reduce concerns that customers
will lose money when lenders fail, halting the deposit shift from
south to north.
The
European Commission unveiled its proposal for such a banking union
last week as directed by leaders in June. The commission is initially
focused on a centralized supervisor, with other elements such as the
deposit guarantee to come later.
Even
the supervision proposal has generated controversy. While there’s
agreement the ECB should play a key role overseeing banks, EU members
are divided about how it will interact with national regulators and
the scope of its powers.
‘Difficult
Road’
Germany,
which spent about 50 billion euros to rescue its failed lenders in
2008, has opposed placing all banks under ECB supervision. At an EU
finance ministers’ meeting in Cyprus last weekend, Germany was
joined by the Netherlands in warning against a hasty move toward
central supervision, while non-euro members such as Sweden criticized
the plan for not protecting those outside the common currency.
While
a banking union is seen as a first step toward a more fiscally united
euro zone, getting there will be politically challenging and take
longer than initially envisioned, according to Alexander White,
European political analyst at JPMorgan Chase & Co. in London.
Euro-area leaders had called for the establishment of a central
supervisor by January, a date which now looks unlikely, White said.
“We’re
still left with very big political questions about who pays for all
this, how the backstops work and so on,” White said during a
conference call with clients last week. “The proposals are going to
be quite difficult for quite a lot of member states. It’s going to
be a difficult road ahead.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.