Whose
Propaganda? A Reply to the Neo-Cons at The Washington Post
Applebaum
splits her time between spewing nonsense about "Russian
aggression" and stoking the flames of anti-Muslim bigotry.
Enough already.
21
October, 2014
This
article first appeared atRussia
Today. It
is in part a response to a recent (and completely delusional) op-ed
inThe
Washington Post by
arch neo-conservative Anne Applebaum. We published Anne
Applebaum's article here.
In
the West, Russian media is often accused of propaganda. If this
really is the aim of the Russian press, they aren't remotely as good
at it as the Washington Post.
Let’s
talk about propaganda and the Western media's use
of ‘star’ columnists to spout it. Let’s, especially,
focus on when that vitriol is deliberately inaccurate. This week’s
best example is the Washington Post columns.
The
Post used to be perceived as a great newspaper, but those were
different times. It has won 47 Pulitzer Prizes and under Philip
Graham’s direction it became regarded, globally, as a beacon of
honest reporting. It’s now owned by the Amazon founder,
Jeff Bezos, who was named the world’s worst boss at this year’s
International Trade Union Confederation World Congress in Berlin. The
ITCU is not some fringe body - it represents 180 million workers.
Some accolade, eh?
“Amazon
operating in Germany treats its workers as if they are robots. The
company makes no secret that within just a few years they will
replace workers with robots. A rich American corporation operating
globally with disdain for dignity, for rights for working
people,” stated Sharan Burrow, the ITCU’s General Secretary.
The
halcyon days of the Post are over and, in a hardly surprising move,
that story didn’t get their, once famed, forensic coverage.
One
of its most prominent op-ed writers is Anne
Applebaum,
who writes on foreign affairs every fortnight. Her brief is global,
but in Anne’s world, Russia seems to be, just about, the only
foreign affair of interest.
People’s
personal lives are usually not relevant here, but Anne is married to
Radoslaw Sikorski, who was recently removed as Poland’s Foreign
Minister, so it merits mention. Sikorski played a prominent role in
stoking up this year’s coup in Ukraine and is, notoriously, hawkish
on Russia. The Pole was affiliated with Washington’s American
Enterprise Institute - a neocon citadel with close links to the
former (George W.) Bush administration in the US. A British citizen
for 19 years, until he renounced it, Sikorski is devoted to Poland
but his world view was largely shaped on foreign fields.
Applebaum,
herself, won a Pulitzer for her book Gulag in 2004. She’s coveted
an image as a ferocious warrior against oppression (so long as that
oppression was in Russia) and chauvinism (again if the intolerance is
in Russia). Although Moscow hijacks most of her time - in fact she’s
made a career out of bashing the country - Applebaum sometimes finds
a gap in her schedule for a bit of Muslim baiting.
In
2009, she claimed that “in
recent years separatist and politically extreme forms of Islam have
emerged in every European country with a large Muslim population:
Britain, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, Denmark, Sweden.”
Now
I’ve never heard of separatist Muslim’s in Denmark, have you? I
also seem to have missed the separatist Islamic uprising in Germany
while I was living there, although a drunken Kurd did propose that
Berlin’s Kreuzberg be made a Muslim ‘zone’ with no
alcohol sold - the irony amused.
Ironically,
the only European country that has recently had a separatist Muslim
problem is Russia. In 2001, when President Putin and then President
Bush allied in the ‘War On Terror’, Applebaum wrote in
London’s Daily Telegraph: “Putin’s commitment to America’s
war on terrorism was made so abruptly, and is so clearly personal,
that I suspect it comes from something deeper: his racism. Or –
since racism is a harsh word – perhaps it is better to say that his
commitment comes from his deep belief that the greatest threat to
Russia now comes not from the West and NATO, but from the South and
Islam."
“When
we tell the world’s Muslims that our war isn’t against them, we’d
better make sure our Russian partners are acting as if they believe
it.” To put it another way, Anne was supportive of Muslims
when she thought Russia was against them. Once, the penny dropped
that Putin wasn’t an Islam-ophobe, she flip-flopped.
And
so to her Washington Post column this
week Applebaum goes on a pro-NATO rant and briefly mentions how great
life is in Europe. Anne lives in Poland, where the average net
monthly salary is €679. Doubtless, life is pure La Dolce Vita there
on an American income, but many locals might demur.
There’s
a bit of spiel about how wonderful and understanding the US was in
the nineties’ and then the fun starts. Applebaum claims that Russia
never qualified to join the old G8 because it was “neither a
large economy nor a democracy.” There’s little doubt
democracy could be improved in Russia, but the fiscal comment is
bizarre. Canada was a member, and still sits at the G7, but its
economy is well under half the size of Russia’s. See the table
below.
G8 by GDP, PPP as of 2013 in billions of US dollars
Russia
|
$3,492
|
France
|
$2,535
|
United
Kingdom
|
$2,320
|
Italy
|
$2,035
|
Canada
|
$1,518
|
(Source:
IMF)
So,
Russia is the 4th biggest economy of the old G8, but Applebaum thinks
it didn’t merit membership on the grounds of being “a large
economy?” If she counters by claiming the piece referred to
the 90’s, Russia was admitted in 1998, when Boris Yeltsin was in
charge and open democracy was all the rage in Russia. The country
defaulted on its debts the same year.
Here’s
another ludicrous statement. “In 1991, Russia was no longer a
great power… so why didn’t we recognize reality, reform the
United Nations and give a Security Council seat to India, Japan or
others?” I can answer that Anne. Russia is the world’s
second largest military power, by all accepted metrics,
and Japan is 10th. In fact, South Korea and Turkey have stronger
militaries than Japan. Not to mention that Russia has 15,000 tanks
and Japan only 767. They won’t be going too far with those. Even in
1991, Russia's nuclear strength alone guaranteed membership.
Russia
is also the only nation in the world that can currently launch a
human being into space. That kind of stuff is important in the world
of security.
The
danger here is that The Washington Post helps frame opinion in
America's corridors of power. The vast majority of elected
representatives have no personal experience of Russia and have never
been there. Instead, their view of the country is framed by what they
consume from the US corporate media. Applebaum speaks to an extremely
powerful audience. Distorting facts to present a false picture in The
Washington Post is callous, improper and viperous.
The
Author is a journalist who has written for the Daily Mail and the
Irish Independent and who appears on RTE, Newstalk and RT TV.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.