Posts
Saudi
Arabia "Outraged" At Obama's Peace Overtures With Syria,
Iran
29
Septem,ber, 2013
Back
in August, just after the false flag chemical weapon attack in
Syria, we
showed that
despite all the posturing by the Obama administration (and, of
course, France's belligerent, socialist leader Francois Hollande),
the nation behind the entire Syrian campaign was not one of the
"democratic", Western nations but none other than close
neighbor Saudi Arabia, and the brain orchestrating every move of the
western puppets was one Bandar bin Sultan, the nation's influential
intelligence chief.
We also explained the plethora of geopolitical
and mostly energy-related issues that Saudi and Qatar had at stake,
which they were eager to launch a regional war over, just to promote
their particular set of selfish interests.
A month later, in clear
confirmation that this was precisely the case, the WSJ reported that
the recent overtures by Obama, brilliantly checkmated by Putin, to
push for a peaceful resolution with not only Syria, but suddenly Iran
as well, has managed to infuriate Saudi Arabia: traditionally one of
the US' closest allies in the region and the key source of crude oil
to the western world.
The Obama administration's handling of overtures on Syria and Iran have outraged regional ally Saudi Arabia, which is signaling it wants to do more to boost the power of armed Sunni rebel groups on the ground in Syria as the U.S. pursues diplomacy.
Saudis fear that Syrian President Basher al-Assad will use the time afforded by U.S.- and U.N.-backed diplomacy on Syria "to impose more killing and to torture its people," Saudi Foreign Minister Saud al-Faisal said Thursday night in New York, in a warning that was overshadowed by the attention paid to the weekend's first public contacts in three decades between the presidents of Iran and the U.S.
...
Two developments have particularly alarmed Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, another Gulf state: U.S.-backed diplomacy that is giving Mr. Assad an opportunity to surrender his chemical weapons, heading off a U.S.-military strike against the Assad regime; and warming relations between Messrs. Obama and Rouhani.
On Sept. 12, as Mr. Rouhani was tweeting some of the first Iranian overtures in decades to the West, former Saudi diplomat Turki al Faisal was telling a London defense forum that Iran's leaders should stand trial for war crimes for supporting Mr. Assad.
"The current charade of international control over Bashar's chemical arsenal would be funny if it were not so blatantly perfidious, and designed not only to give Mr. Obama an opportunity to back down, but also to help Assad butcher his people," Prince Turki said then.
Oh
yes, it is the inequitable treatment of Syrian people that has
outraged that paragon of humanism and civil liberties, Saudi Arabia,
whose oligarchs are best known for paying
billions in petrodollars to bribe their own populace in
2011 to avoid the same swift and terminal fate that befell all other
regional dictators during the Arab Spring. Surely the transit of
local commodities, either crude or primarily
LNG under Syria,
has nothing to do with Saudi outrage at the US betrayal of its
national interests.
So
with the main western ally out of the picture, it means Saudi Arabia
will have to brave it alone.
The Saudi foreign minister's declaration is significant because Saudi Arabia, while one of the main suppliers of Syria's predominately Sunni opposition, up to now has heeded U.S. fears throughout the conflict that aid to Syrian rebels could strengthen armed, anti-Western Sunni factions. Shiite Muslim Iran backs Mr. Assad in the Syrian conflict, while most Sunni Muslim-ruled Gulf Arab states support the rebels fighting to overthrow Mr. Assad.
Saudi Arabia, for example, long held off on supplying Stinger-style missiles to Syrian rebels because of U.S. worries the missiles could be used against Western targets, security analysts briefed by Saudi officials say. Saudi Arabia increased pressure on the U.S. to allow arming the rebels with antiaircraft weapons this summer, as larger numbers of Hezbollah fighters entered the conflict on the side of Mr. Assad's regime.
Ironically,
in now desperately trying to make it appear that Obama (and John
Kerry) is a pacifist after nearly launching World War III (while
simply playing a minor role in a script designed by Vladimir Putin),
the Nobel peace prize winner has succeeded in alienating a key
strategic ally while
gaining absolutely nothing in return.
Saudis now feel that the Obama administration is disregarding Saudi concerns over Iran and Syria, and will respond accordingly in ignoring "U.S. interests, U.S. wishes, U.S. issues" in Syria, said Mustafa Alani, a veteran Saudi security analyst with the Geneva-based Gulf Research Center.
"They are going to be upset—we can live with that," Mr. Alani said Sunday of the Obama administration. "We are learning from our enemies now how to treat the United States."
Why
with friends like these, who needs to create false flag attacks
against US enemies...
At
the end of the day, however, Saudi knows that it can not
jeopardize
its key customer relationships and certainly not the Petrodollar, so
while it is worried about the religious and political implications of
what a failure in Syria means, there is little it can actually do on its
own.
its key customer relationships and certainly not the Petrodollar, so
while it is worried about the religious and political implications of
what a failure in Syria means, there is little it can actually do on its
own.
Sunni-dominated Gulf Arab governments, especially Saudi Arabia, deeply fear that Shiite Muslim-ruled Iran wants to use Shia populations in Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain and Yemen to destabilize Gulf Arab governments and try to throw the regional balance of power toward Iran.
Saudi Arabia wants the U.S. and Iran to improve relations for the sake of Middle East stability, but no longer trusts the Obama administration to look out for Saudi Arabia's fears of perceived Iranian expansionism, said Mr. Alani, the analyst with the Gulf Research Center.
In truth, Saudi and other Gulf Arab countries have little leverage to advance their aims in any U.S.-Iran diplomacy, Gulf security analysts said. Beyond revving up support for rebels in Syria, Saudis have only a few other means, such as directing more of their arms or energy deals to Asia, said Michael Stephens, researcher at the Royal United Services Institute think tank in Qatar.
"They feel a little bit powerless in all this," Mr. Stephens said. "The fact that this process is going on…it directly affects them and they have no say in it."
But
while Saudi Arabia, tremendous diplomatic manipulator that it is,
will behave rationally, it is far less certain what Israel will do
and how it will respond to the sudden and very much unexpected US
detente in the middle-east: an unpalatable peaceful outcome to the
two nations, and one where Israel and Saudi bellicose interests are
very much aligned.
Netanyahu
plays hawk to Rouhani's dove with anti-Iran rhetoric
Israeli
PM angered at thawing relations between Washington and Tehran but
observers say he is out of step with allies
29
September, 2013
The
Israeli prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, vowed to "tell the
truth" about Iran's nuclear programme as he flew to the US on
Sunday to meet Barack Obama and address the United Nations.
A
diplomatic offensive at the UN last week by Iran's new president,
Hassan Rouhani, who had a historic 15-minute phone conversation with
Obama on Friday, has raised concerns in Israel, which fears improving
relations between the US, one of its closest allies, and Iran, one of
its worst enemies.
There
is concern that if the US eases economic sanctions and removes any
military threat, Tehran would be freer to create a nuclear bomb.
Officials
say Netanyahu will present evidence of continued Iranian efforts to
attain a nuclear weapon, and will urge the US and others not to be
taken in by Rouhani's charm offensive."I will tell the truth in
the face of the sweet talk and offensive of smiles," Netanyahu
said on Saturday night before boarding his plane to New York. "One
must talk facts and tell the truth. Telling the truth today is vital
for the security and peace of the world and, of course, it is vital
for the security of our country."
As
Netanyahu travelled to the US, Israel's Shin Bet domestic security
agency announced it had arrested an Iranian with Belgian nationality
who was suspected of spying for Tehran. The agency said Ali Mansouri,
58, carried photos of the US embassy in Tel Aviv and had been
promised $1m (£620,000) to set up companies in Israel on behalf of
the Iranian intelligence services "to harm Israeli and western
interests".
Israeli
commentators said Netanyahu would have to work hard to offset the
impression left by Rouhani in his UN speech and media appearances,
where he presented himself as a peace-seeking moderate. "The
Iranian president was very successful in convincing many in the US
who want to be convinced that there is a new spirit in Tehran and a
great willingness now for compromise. It will be an enormous
challenge for Netanyahu to reverse that trend," said Jonathan
Spyer, a senior research fellow at the Interdisciplinary Centre in
Herzliya.
In
the Yediot Ahronot newspaper, prominent columnist Nahum Barnea wrote
that, in his phone conversation with Rouhani, Obama had "folded
the flag which Netanyahu had waved to Israelis and the world, the
basis of his diplomatic existence".
Barnea
added: "The threat of a military attack by the US has been
removed, at least in the coming months, and it is doubtful if there
ever was an Israeli military threat."
Netanyahu
has argued for increased sanctions on Iran, backed by a "credible
military threat" that he said proved itself in the case of
Syria, which under threat of a US strike agreed to international
control of its chemical weapons.
The
Israeli leader has urged that Iran be pressed to halt all uranium
enrichment, remove enriched uranium from the country, dismantle the
Fordo nuclear plant and stop "the plutonium track" to a
nuclear weapon.
Yossi
Alpher, an Israeli strategic analyst, said that Netanyahu's "strident
tone", which included ordering the Israeli UN delegation to walk
out of Rouhani's speech, meant that "he's coming across as a
kind of spoiler".
"I
don't think he will be able to persuasively argue that Rouhani is not
worth talking to," Alpher said. "We lose a degree of
credibility when we allow ourselves to be totally out of synch with
our allies on this issue."
