Live
in San Francisco? You, Your dog, And Your Kids Inhaled Billions Of
Radioactive Plutonium Atoms
29
January, 2014
The
title of the video above: Live in San Francisco? You (and your dog)
Inhaled 75 MILLION Plutonium Atoms In Just 4 days
People,
kids (and dogs) living in San Francisco inhaled 75 million plutonium
atoms or 'hot' particles in just 4 days, according to PorterBlog
analysis of EPA data. This data is VERY conservative, and is based on
a 1 second inhalation/exhalation with no particles sticking in the
lungs, which is not realistic, and is discounted by a huge factor. No
one breathes in and out in just one second.
Remember
that these dozens of different types of invisible radioactive gases
and particles came out of Fukushima for MONTHS, not just 4 days. So
you can safely multiply these figures by 2 for a one week period,
(150 Million) then again by 4 for one month, (600 million) then again
by 2 or 3 for the several months (1,800 million) because Fukushima
was on fire, exploding, leaking and steaming with larger amounts of
radiation for months after 3/11, not just for 4 days. As a matter of
fact, Fukushima is still spewing hot particles today, and unit #3 is
still steaming, out of control, and highly radioactive water is still
being dumped or leaked into the ocean at a rate of 400 tons per day,
or more.
Remember
also, that this analysis is only counting ONE radioactive element,
and there were many more. Now you can multiply the above by the
number of different radioactive elements. Let's say we multiply this
one element by at least a very conservative 1,000, to count for a
portion of the 1,946 radioactive elements that are documented to come
out of nuclear accidents? Read about just one other radioactive
element; namely Xenon, via the link below.
Radioactive
Xenon Gas; Dangerous And Lung Cancer Causing Isotope; via A Green
Road
1,946
Lethal Radioactive Man Made Isotopes Are Created By Nuclear Plants
And Atomic Bombs; via @AGreenRoad
What
effect will this plutonium, iodine, strontium, uranium, xenon and
1,940 other toxic, radioactive elements that came out of Fukushima
have on your children, and your grandchildren, and your pets? Time
will tell, but the effects seem to be showing up in our wild ocean
companions on this planet, via die offs of star fish, herring, seals,
larger fish, birds, and sickened sore covered hair losing polar
bears, seals and walruses.
Add
this up; we are now up to 1,800 million atoms times 1,000. So a total
of 180,000 million radioactive element atoms were breathed in by an
average child, pet and adult in San Francisco and quite possibly by
everyone in the USA. Who wants to convert these atoms to a radiation
dose, or convert it to a microgram of plutonium, via the comments
section below? We will add this information into the article later,
as we learn more...
Via
CCNR.org;
"Subject:
Quantity
of Plutonium that an Atomic Radiation Worker
and
the Public may Inhale to Reach their Respective Limits
Dear
Ms. Ostling:
The
Atomic Energy Control Board (AECB) does not set maximum permissible
quantities of radionuclides for workers or the public. Regulatory
protection criteria are expressed in terms of effective dose limits.
In
this context, we understand your question to mean: "What is the
quantity of plutonium oxide, if inhaled, would give rise to an
effective dose of 50 mSv [ millisieverts ] to a worker or 5 mSv to a
member of the public?"
As
the result of an intake, these doses will be received over 50 years
by a worker and over a period ending at age 70 by a member of the
public. These calculations have been made for insoluble (in lung
fluid) plutonium oxide of 1 micrometer size. These assumptions are
very conservative (restrictive); in other words the worst case
scenario has been assumed.
workers:
1.4
micrograms for 50 mSv committed effective dose
(over
50 years after intake)
public:
0.1
microgram for 5 mSv committed effective dose
(up
to age 70)"
The
link below also shows the toxicity and lethality of plutonium when
applied to human beings.
The
numbers presented in the video are very conservative, because the EPA
radiation detection network was turned off in the worst hit radiation
areas, at the very times and days when the worst of the radiation
plume was coming over them.
What
right does the nuclear industry have to perform this radiation
experiment on millions, possibly billions of people on planet Earth?
What
is the take away? Massive amounts of plutonium and other radioactive
elements were released from Fukushima. Everyone in the northern
hemisphere breathed at least some of these things in.
Here
are some medical and scientific studies to give you some possible
ideas of what effects we may see in the near future, as the
incubation periods run out on the plutonium, strontium, iodine, and
other radioactive elements that everyone breathed in, and are now
eating, and drinking via Fukushima contaminated foods and drinks....
Dog
Studies And Inhaled Plutonium Radiation Effects; via @AGreenRoad
Take
care of your family, protect your pets, and do what you can to make
sure that the nuclear industry is shut down and cannot do this to
anyone, ever again. All nuclear power planets need to be shut down,
as soon as possible.
End
Live
in San Francisco? You, Your dog, And Your Kids Inhaled Billions Of
Radioactive Plutonium Atoms; via @AGreenRoad
|
Subscribe to
Posts
All Comments
Showing posts with label plutonium. Show all posts
Showing posts with label plutonium. Show all posts
Thursday, 30 January 2014
Hot Particles in San Francisco
Tuesday, 10 December 2013
Plutonium in water leaking into ocean
Nuclear
Expert: Plutonium in water leaking into ocean is “the most
dangerous thing” at Fukushima, it can be carried around world and
end up on a beach or in fish
Researcher:
Plutonium contamination “a serious threat to environment and human
health”
10
December, 2013
American
Chemical Society,
Dec. 9, 2013: As the Fukushima crisis continues to remind the world
of the potential dangers of nuclear disposal and unforeseen
accidents, scientists are reporting progress toward a new way to
detect the radioactive materials uranium and plutonium in waste
water. Their report on the design of a highly sensitive nanosensor
appears in
ACS’ The Journal of Physical Chemistry C.
[...]
ACS
Global Challenges/Chemistry Solutions Podcast,
Dec. 9, 2013: Today’s solution is a new way to detect the
radioactive materials uranium and plutonium in waste water. As the
Fukushima crisis continues to remind the world of the potential
dangers of nuclear disposal and unforeseen accidents, scientists are
reporting the design of a highly sensitive nanosensor that could
detect even the smallest radiation leaks in nuclear waste water. The
report appears in ACS’ The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. Jorge
Seminario, Ph.D., points out that it’s highly likely that
radioactive uranium and plutonium have leaked into the soil and
groundwater near nuclear facilities. This contamination poses a
serious threat to the environment and human health. [...] >>
To
hear podcast GO
HERE
Professor
Vladimir Kuznetsov, advisory board member of Russia’s state-owned
nuclear monopoly, in 2011:
“In all likelihood, fuel at the second reactor is melting and
burning through the reactor containment and may get into the ocean
and soil [...] The seeping of plutonium into soil and water is the
most dangerous thing that can happen. Ocean currents may carry it
around the world, and nobody knows whether it ends up inside fish or
on a beach.”
Plutonium in the desert
Here is mention of plutonium detected after the Fukushima disaster - it could slip through unnoticed. Thanks to ENENews
Director:
We saw plutonium from Fukushima out in New Mexico desert
“Local
and regional contaminations of plutonium in environment have resulted
from nuclear accident”
8
December, 2013
Fukushima
On
March 11, 2011, a tsunami hit the Fukushima Daiichi power plant in
Japan, causing the plant to lose the ability to cool its reactors,
resulting in a meltdown. On March 14, CEMRC observed activity from
this event in their environmental filters.
"It
took roughly three days (for radioactive material) to come 10,000
miles," Hardy said. "It was low-level activity, below any
environmental concern, but we started seeing iodine-131, tellurium
and cesium. We know that it came from Fukushima because of when it
happened and because each of the nuclear incidents -- whether it's
Chernobyl, Fukushima or Three Mile Island -- they each use different
mixtures in their fuel rods and they have different types of
reactors. When they have an incident, they create their own
signature. Looking at these ratios of plutonium, americium and
cesium, you can determine which event it was tied to."
"The
four times that we've seen plutonium out in the desert (from a 1960
Atomic Energy Commission underground explosion 12 miles from
Carlsbad), as well as the Fukushima incident, just validates that
what we're doing works," Hardy said. "Most of the time we
see zero, and that's a good thing, but if there ever were a release,
we would be able see it and with the data that we have, be able to
determine where it came from."
That
has to be squared from the following -
"Eye
on Research" is provided by New Mexico State University. This
week's feature was written by Emily C. Kelley of University
Communications and Marketing Services
011
Report: Carlsbad Environmental Monitoring & Research Center
(.pdf):
[...] in the event of a nuclear accident like Fukushima, such
contaminants could be rapidly dispersed through the atmosphere and
spread throughout the environment. […] local and regional
contaminations of plutonium in the environment have resulted from
nuclear accidents such as Chernobyl and Fukushima. These events
resulted in the release of substantial quantities of radioactive
contaminants into the global environment [...] No detectable
concentrations of 238Pu, 239+240Pu or 241Am were detected in any of
the 2011 samples. However, a trace amount of cesium (134Cs) and
(137Cs) was detected in the March monthly composite samples due to
the Fukushima NPP accident in Japan. […]
Then
is it “no detectable concentrations” of plutonium were detected
from Fukushima as stated in the 2011 report, or “we’ve seen
plutonium” from Fukushima as stated in today’s article?
http://enenews.com/facility-director-we-saw-fukushima-plutonium-out-in-the-new-mexico-desert-local-and-regional-contaminations-of-plutonium-in-the-environment-have-resulted
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)