I commented a few days ago about Dane Wigington's comments about the Texas storm event being an artificially ice-nucleated storm that was spawned in the Gulf of Mexico.
I still maintain he does not fully understand the mechanism of the jet stream and the melting Arctic. Dane still maintains that all weather events are geoengineered to suppress the news about the collapsing ecosystem.
Correct, in. part, I still maintain.
It is hard for me to argue against evidence of chemicals in the snow and snow that catches on fire and goes quickly from solid to gas without passing through the liquid stage.
Weather Warfare in Texas - Snow That Doesn’t Melt – Dane Wigington
This is the voice of a REAL ecologist who puts boots on and gets into the field.
It reminds me of another self-appointed armchair ecologist "Ask an ecologist anything" who when he visited the farm where we kept our horses behaved like the most extreme townie.
The extremely anomalous surface cool-down in Texas and other parts of the world are not just random acts of Nature. Global climate engineering operations are not just a proposal, they have been an ongoing reality for over 70 years. Erratic and unprecedented weather is radically increasing everywhere. Though there are countless forms of human activity affecting the equation, the global climate engineering programs are by far the single greatest and most destructive factor. The geoengineers are manufacturing winter weather scenarios on a scale that can scarcely be comprehended, such operations are nothing short of winter weather warfare. Ecosystems are being decimated by the climate engineering onslaught. No habitat, no humans. What will it take to bring the geoengineering issue to light, once and for all?
The photos below were just captured near Kerrville, Texas. The images clearly reveal the results and consequences of chemical ice nucleation operations. Patented processes of chemical ice nucleation for weather modification are a primary component of the climate engineering programs.
The climate engineers have also inflicted immense chemical ice nucleation damage to the forests of Northern California. In this third installment of “Into The Wild” , the consequences of engineered winter weather events are documented.
Pictures of freaky “eggs” of various sizes captured by Oulu resident and amateur photographer Risto Mattila during a stroll on the nearby beach Marjaniemi in Ostrobothnia have become an Instagram hit.
By his own admission, this is is the first time Mattila has encountered this 30-metre assemblage of oval egg-shaped ice floes in the 25 years he has been living near the sea.
“My wife and I stood there marvelling at the remarkable natural phenomenon. Since I had a camera with me I decided to preserve this unusual sight for posterity”, Mattila told national broadcaster Yle.
Pictures of the weird formations, later published by Yle, left the Finnish public mystified and scratching their heads over how these may have appeared. Some joked about eggs without a hen to brood them.
Nothing Supernatural
Ice specialist Jouni Vainio of the Finnish Meteorological Institute explained that while indeed rare, the “ice eggs” have a perfectly scientific explanation.
To appear, they require a seldom seen combination of near-freezing air and water conditions.
“Too much wind would prevent the ball from forming. On the other hand, if calm, the water would just freeze on the beach in an even layer”, Vainio continued.
He also stressed that Mattila was lucky to encounter the eggs, because they only tend to appear for a short period of time, either melting down or congesting into a large chunk of ice, where individual objects are no longer discernible.
This
is something that I have resisted tooth-and-nail for a long time but
am forced to change my views in the face of evidence to acknowledge
that weather manipulation is part of the picture in hiding the real
effects of global heating. Dane
Wigington – Wildfires and Hurricanes all Part of Climate
Manipulation
Greg
Hunter
Climate
engineering researcher Dane Wigington says you can see real time,
conclusive evidence that these storms (such as hurricane Dorian) are
being manipulated. . . . “We can speculate on the agenda, but the
fact that that storm is being manipulated and stalled is absolute
indisputable fact. The U.S. military started their hurricane
manipulation operations 72 years ago in 1947. We have 7 decades of
this going on. . . . President Johnston stated on the record that the
military had the power to control the world’s cloud cover even
then. The notion that this is not going on right now is simply a
deception.”
The
wildfires around the world are also being leveraged by climate
engineers. Wigington explains, “We have many, many sources for the
ignition of those wildfires. We are not claiming to come to any
conclusions on the sources of the ignition for the fires. What we
are saying is the conditions are being orchestrated to make it
conducive to make these burns. The template is being set by climate
engineering. There is absolutely no question about that. . . . These
wildfires are being used as a last ditch, desperate effort by the
climate engineers to put enough sun blocking particles into the
atmosphere to temporarily mask the Polar Regions on which life
depends.”
Join
Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with Dane Wigington, founder of the
biggest climate engineering website on the planet,
GeoEngineeringWatch.org.
***
Of all the people out there Dane Wigington is one of the few to acknowledge the Arctic cyclone and the fraud by the authorities to hide the reality of climate change.
One thing he talks about that was new for me was the use of ice nucleation to keep America cooler than the rest of the world and much cooler than it should be.
He is even more radical than Sam Carana and others and contends that global temperatures have gone up by more than 3 degrees Celsius.
Geoengineering The Polar
Regions: The Chemical Ice
Nucleation Factor
Chemical
ice nucleation processes must be seen to be believed. The vast
majority have no idea how powerful chemical ice nucleating /endothermic reacting materials are. The vast majority have no idea
that such chemicals are being utilized by the global climate
engineering cabal on a massive scale. The use of such patented processes is not just for engineering winter storms on a rapidly warming world, but the same chemical elements are being used to
artificially / chemically nucleate ice on sea surfaces. Power
structure funded disinformation individuals and sources, of course,
never mention chemical ice nucleation (and its use by the
geoengineers) while putting out completely false information about
"global cooling" or "global warming is a hoax".
Such false narratives are extremely harmful to the critical cause ofexposing and halting climate engineering. Such false narratives are
also exactly what the power structure and the climate engineers want.
The climate science community also toes the line for the power
structure and the geoengineers by never mentioning the ongoing
climate engineering insanity in any way. To do otherwise is a very
bad career decision, or worse. The illegal federal gag order on allNational Weather Service (NWS) and all all National Oceanic andAtmospheric Administration (NOAA) employees (courtesy of the Obama
administration) is further proof of this fact. Sea surface chemical
ice nucleation creates extremely anomalous patterns that resemble a
chemical spill dispersion (because that is exactly what these
patterns are). The recent NASA satellite images below (taken in the
polar regions) provide shocking proof of these sea surface patterns.
This is yet another attempt to make sense of the polar ice and nucleation.
Dane Wigington actually provides very little in the way of direct evidence
"Sea
surface chemical ice nucleation creates extremely anomalous patterns
that resemble a chemical spill dispersion (because that is exactly
what these patterns are). The recent NASA satellite images below
(taken in the polar regions) provide shocking proof of these sea
surface patterns."
We are very unlikely to actually catch planes spraying the Arctic region so until that happens Ice nucleation remains a working hypothesis that goes a long way to explaining the strange anomalies we are observing, including seeing us "dodging the bullet" every year when it looks as if we might be headed for a blue sea event.
The whole thing is that we are seeing the creation of ice in conditions that seem to be too warm for the creation of ice, especially in water (both in the cases of Greenland and Novaya Zemlya) that are too warm for sea ice to fall.
First, I wanted to look at the concept of "grease ice" as a possible explanation.This is from Wikpedia:
Grease ice is a very thin, soupy layer of frazil crystals clumped together, which makes the ocean surface resemble an oil slick. Grease ice is the second stage in the formation of solid sea ice after ice floes and then frazil ice.
New sea ice formation takes place throughout the winter in the Arctic. The first ice that forms in a polynya are loose ice crystals called frazil ice. If the level of turbulence is sufficient, the frazil ice will be mixed down into the upper layer and form a surface layer of grease ice.
The term ‘grease ice’ follows World Meteorological Organization nomenclature. Grease ice differs from ‘slush’, where slush is similarly created by snow falling into the top layer of an ocean basin, river, or lake. The two terms are related due to the process of ice crystals being blown into a polynya which can be the initiation of the grease ice layer, given a minimum level of mixing and cooling of the ocean surface.
Formation
When the water surface begins to lose heat rapidly, the water becomes supercooled. Turbulence, caused by strong winds or flow from a river, will mix the supercooled water throughout its entire depth. The supercooled water will already be encouraging the formation of small ice crystals (frazil ice) and the crystals will be mixed into the upper layer and form a surface layer.
Sea ice growth in turbulent water differs from sea ice growth in calm water. In turbulent water, the ice crystals accumulate at the surface, forming a grease-ice layer composed of individual ice crystals and small irregular clumps of ice crystals. In calm water conditions, nilas, a thick elastic crust, forms at the surface, which thickens as water molecules freeze to the ice-water interface.
Parkinson, Claire L.; Comiso, Josefino C.; Zwally, H. Jay; Cavalieri, Donald J.; Gloersen, Per; Campbell, William J. (1987), Arctic Sea Ice, 1973-1976: Satellite Passive-Microwave Observations, Washington, DC: NASA Scientific and Technical Information Branch, p. 3, OCLC14586790
Smedsrud, Lars H.; Skogseth, Ragnheid (2006), Field Measurements of Arctic Grease Ice Properties and Processes, Cold Regions Science and Technology 44, pp. 171–183
The above reads more like a description than an explanation, and certainly this statement, "When
the water surface begins to lose heat rapidly, the water becomes
supercooled" could apply just as much to ice nucleation as to any natural phenomenon.
So this doesn't really prove or disprove anything.
So, we are back to sea surface temperature.
We know that -
The
amount of salt in sea water also determines the temperature at which
sea water freezes. Adding salt to water lowers the freezing
temperature. Water with a salinity of 17‰ freezes at about 30°F
(-1°C) and 35‰ water freezes at about about 28.5°F (-2°C). Yet,
despite the saltiness of the ocean, sea ice contains very little
salt, about a tenth of the amount of salt that sea water has. This is
because ice will not incorporate sea salt into its crystal structure.
Therefore, sea ice is actually drinkable.
Changes in the Arctic mean that warm, salty water has moved into the polar region meaning that salinity levels are at about 35 per cent.
So ice in the region should only form at -2 degrees Celsius (or lower than that seeing we are talking about ocean water, not water in a glass)
I will look at two regions where we see exactly the conditions Dane Wigington is talking about identified by Margo in her video from yesterday.
There are areas of "grease ice"or ice nucleation off the coast of Greenland and of Novaya Zemlya in the Barents Sea.
GREENLAND
This is a shot taken off the coast of Greenland, north of Iceland
This overlay on NASA Worldview is used to identify sea surface temperature.
This indicates a temperature on the green area as 264 degrees Kelvin (-9 degrees C)
The alternative measurement is with Earth Nullschool which shows a temperature of -1.2 degrees Celsius.
NOVAYA ZEMLYA
This photo shows another strange phenomenon of "tentacles" coming off the ice.
NASA Worldvew shows a sea surface temeperature of 223 degrees Kelvin whih I say does not compute as it translates into -50 degrees Celsius, which does not make any sense, given that we are looking at open water where the temperature was measured.
Earth Nullschool shows a temperature of approximately -0.7 degrees Celsius.
I would day, given that we are looking at sea surface temperature in open water as opposed to ice that this may be the more realistic figure
If so, it is too warm for ice to form.
In view of any significant countervailing evidence I will stick to the hypothesis that ice is being created in the Arctic to hide the true state of affairs.
A
discussion of the nature of evidence for geoengineering
I
am making a second video with some of my after-thoughts.
Someone
posted this under the comments:
"Why
is there such a resistance even among our friends to acknowledge
ongoing chemical ice nucleated winter storms and other geoengineering
programs going on?"
It
gave me some cause for thought and I have been reflecting on this and
came to the conclusion that most of this can be put down to
reductionistic thinking.
Reductionistic
thinking dominates over everything and systems (or holistic)
thinking does not have a chance.
Most
people think in a dualistic way
It
can only ever be this,
not that.
This
is good while that
Is bad.
In
order to preserve ‘this’
to kill thatd
a thought about reductionistic thinking. It can only ever be this,
not that. So they have, in order to preserve ‘this’ to kill
‘that’’
EVERYTHING
has to be climate change. There's only ever ONE case.
It
can’t be Fuku, geoengineering or anything else.
Which
is nonsense. Nature -in fact NOTHING – works that way.
There
is a complex web of interrelationship. In short, in the words of
Thich Nhat Hanh we inter ARE.
So,
in this complex relationship not only is climate changing because of
mamade greenhouse gas emissions but we have the effects of Fukushima
and many other factors coming together to create the
perfect storm.
Personally,having
looked into this a bit over the past 6 months I have come to the
conclusion that geoengineering – not theroretical but actual – is
part of the picture.
How
big I have no idea – but part of the picture yes.
It
grieves me no end to hear that some people complaining completely
legitimately of what I may call 'consensus science' to be as fair as
I can being used to diss legitimate concerns about polar ice and
methane clathrates to give an example – then turn around and use
the same tactics on others, such as Daner Wigington who is,whether he
is right or wrong is trying his best.
If
I was completely honest, rather than go on the attack I would simply
(and rather more diplomatically) simply say I am confident about my
area of expertise but I am not going to be deflected into lines of
inquiry that are not part of it.
That,
at least, is how I would approach things now.
Talking
of evidence, as I said, I think there is
evidence aplenty.
Obviously
you are never going to get a peer-reviewed paper on this. Nobody can
get funds to research something so out of the box that would, if
proven true, totally overturn all the official narratives in a
similar way to observations and proof of
ABRUPT climate change.
I
am not sufficiently familiar with the subject to discuss this in
detail but I can say this:
My
interest in this came not from watching videos or even reading
articles. It came from observations of what is happening in the sky
above me as well as looking from above in satellite images.
I
then went searching for an explanation and no one up to now has come
up with a credible explanation.
In
fact it was listening to Paul Beckwith debate Dane Wigington that
helped me to come to the conclusion that there might be something in
this.
Evidence
is indirect and comes from people's observations and the fact that
people were getting sick from exposure to aluminium and other heavy
metals leaching out and falling with the rain.
This
has been borne out by a lot of documentary evidence such as patents
for the technology and examples of people inadvertantly 'spilling the
beans'.
I
feel greatly for the people that have become sick because of this.
In
my own case, my own health has been delivered a huge blow by exposure
to pesticides. Every time I would mention this the eyes would glaze
over or I would be told 'there
is no proof'.
Until
recently – in my last session with the neurologist I mentioned
pesticides and he said "the
only thing I know is that paraquat can cause Parksinsons or similar
neurological
disorders.
But
it was specifically paraquat that I was exposed to!
And
then I learned from a friend who has researched this that a chemical
called atrazine,
te use pf which was mandated by the government similarly causes
Parkinsons.
There's
LACK OF PROOF
for you!
People
who feel they are healthy will find it very easy to ignore and debunk
the evidence.
Its
what I call "contempt
prior to investigation"
Not
totally unconnected with this I would like to show some examples
that taken by themselves might not be proof but taken together
provide anecdotal
evidence (and
I am a great fan of anecdote) – of a program to geoengineer both
the weather and -yes, Paul Beckwith! - the climate.
Because I had to record a second video I got confused and left this out of the video
Posts
