We've all experienced them. They make proper discussion difficult
We have all seen the following - something that the powers-that-be seek to exploit -
Read Glenn Greenwald's article, How Covert Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive, and Destroy Reputations
Hear how NZ intelligence services are implicated in dirty tricks
Read Glenn Greenwald's article, How Covert Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive, and Destroy Reputations
Yes,
There Are Paid Government Trolls On Social Media, Blogs, Forums And
Websites
Michael
Snyder
26
February, 2014
Do
you want solid proof that paid government shills are targeting
websites, blogs, forums and social media accounts? For years,
many have suspected that government trolls have been systematically
causing havoc all over the Internet, but proving it has been
difficult. But now thanks to documents leaked by Edward Snowden
and revealed by Glenn Greenwald, we finally have hard evidence that
western governments have been doing this. As you will see
below, a UK intelligence outfit known as the Government
Communications Headquarters, through a previously secret unit known
as the Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group, has been
systematically attempting “to control, infiltrate, manipulate, and
warp online discourse”. This should be deeply disturbing to
anyone that values free speech on the Internet.
It
isn’t just that the British government is trying to influence what
people are thinking. The reality is that this is far bigger
than a mere propaganda campaign. As Greenwald recently noted on
his new website,
the “integrity of the Internet itself” is at stake…
By publishing these stories one by one, our NBC reporting highlighted some of the key, discrete revelations: themonitoring of YouTube and Blogger, the targeting of Anonymous with the very same DDoS attacks they accuse “hacktivists” of using, the use of “honey traps” (luring people into compromising situations using sex) and destructive viruses. But, here, I want to focus and elaborate on the overarching point revealed by all of these documents: namely, that these agencies are attempting to control, infiltrate, manipulate, and warp online discourse, and in doing so, are compromising the integrity of the internet itself.
So
what techniques are the British using to control and manipulate
discourse on the Internet? According to Greenwald, the
documents that Snowden has uncovered show that they are willing to
sink to despicable lows in order to get the results that they desire…
Among the core self-identified purposes of JTRIG are two tactics: (1) to inject all sorts of false material onto the internet in order to destroy the reputation of its targets; and (2) to use social sciences and other techniques tomanipulate online discourse and activism to generate outcomes it considers desirable. To see how extremist these programs are, just consider the tactics they boast of using to achieve those ends: “false flag operations” (posting material to the internet and falsely attributing it to someone else), fake victim blog posts (pretending to be a victim of the individual whose reputation they want to destroy), and posting “negative information” on various forums.
The
following is a list of Internet infiltration techniques that were
listed on one particular slide that Snowden leaked…
-Infiltration
Operation
-Ruse
Operation
-Set
Piece Operation
-False
Flag Operation
-False
Rescue Operation
-Disruption
Operation
-Sting
Operation
There
is also evidence that the Canadian government has been involved in
this sort of thing as well. The following comes from Natural
News…
You’ve probably run into them before — those seemingly random antagonizers who always end up diverting the conversation in an online chat room or article comment section away from the issue at hand, and towards a much different agenda. Hot-button issues like illegal immigration, the two-party political system, the “war on terror” and even alternative medicine are among the most common targets of such attackers, known as internet “trolls” or “shills,” who in many cases are nothing more than paid lackeys hired by the federal government and other international organizations to sway and ultimately control public opinion.
Several years ago, Canada’s CTV News aired a short segment about how its own government had been exposed for hiring secret agents to monitor social media and track online conversations, as well as the activities of certain dissenting individuals. This report, which in obvious whitewashing language referred to such activities as the government simply “weighing in and correcting” allegedly false information posted online, basically admitted that the Canadian government had assumed the role of secret online police.
Are
you disturbed yet?
You
should be.
So
what kind of people are the governments of the western world
targeting online?
Well,
when it comes to the U.S. government, all you have to do is to look
at their official documents to see who they consider the “problems”
to be. For much more on this, please see my previous article
entitled “72
Types Of Americans That Are Considered ‘Potential Terrorists’ In
Official Government Documents“.
Sadly,
the reality of the matter is that the days of the free and open
Internet are numbered. The governments of the world are
increasing their control over the Internet with each passing day, and
eventually a time will likely come when we will not be able to
communicate openly like this any longer.
A recent court decision that endorsed a broad view of the Federal Communications Commission’s authority over the Internet has Google and other Web companies nervous.
In closed-door meetings with regulators and Capitol Hill staff, Google’s lawyers have said they’re worried how the FCC may use its newfound powers, according to multiple people familiar with the meetings.
The extent of the FCC’s authority over Google and other Web services remains unclear, and the current FCC has given no indication that it is interested in pushing aggressive new regulations. But the possibility that the commission could begin telling Google how to organize its search results or handle its users’ data is enough to spook the company’s army of Washington lobbyists.
And
this is just the beginning.
If
you think that the control freaks that are running things now are
bad, just wait until you see the next generation of control freaks.
For
example, there is one prominent student writer at Harvard that
apparently believes that free speech at her university should be
abolished and that any professor that does not advocate for her
politically-correct version of “justice” should
be fired…
A student writer at Harvard University is raising eyebrows after publishing her belief that free speech on campus should be abolished and professors with opposing views be fired.
Sandra Korn, a senior who writes a column for the Harvard Crimson newspaper, thinks radical leftism is the only permissible political philosophy, and the First Amendment only hinders colleges from brainwashing students with her viewpoint.
“Let’s give up on academic freedom in favor of justice,” states the subtitle of her Feb. 18 column, in which she insists Harvard stop guaranteeing students and professors the right to hold controversial views and conduct research putting liberalism in a negative light.
“If our university community opposes racism, sexism, and heterosexism, why should we put up with research that counters our goals?” Korn asks.
This
is what control freaks always want.
They
always want to shut down those that are presenting opposing views.
They
don’t believe in free speech and a “marketplace of ideas”.
Rather, they believe in shoving what they believe down the rest of
our throats.
And
now we have solid proof that the governments of the western world are
paying people to manipulate discourse on social media, blogs, forums
and websites.
So
will there be great outrage over this, or will the apathetic public
just roll over and ignore this like they have so many other times the
past few years?
We have all seen the following - something that the powers-that-be seek to exploit -
Read Glenn Greenwald's article, How Covert Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive, and Destroy Reputations
Hear how NZ intelligence services are implicated in dirty tricks
Careful posting anything written by Snyder. He's a troll himself. He's guilty of shoveling a lot of nonsense, unsubstantiated claims, straw arguments, ad hominen attacks and conspiracy bullshit.
ReplyDeleteIf it says "Snyder", I've learned to never read it. He's never had an original thought that he hasn't stolen from someone else.
Re: most connedspiracy authors and websites are working for the NSA and DHS, even if unknowingly. They've long censored their commentators to ensure that only approved comments are allowed. Any dissent is swiftly squashed.
After several decades of watching this behavior, and studying the conspiracies they promote, I no longer accept 90% - 99% of them as being accurate, truthful, ethical or worth paying any attention to. There is just no point in listening to tools and fools who weave together absolute bullshit.
It has been evident for many years now that the StupidNet is being widely manipulated for news and information. Conspiracy authors and websites have been caught up in this widespread deception, infiltrated by provacateurs and have allowed themselves to be seriously manipulated, while pretending to be objective and / or accurate. They are none of these things anymore.
The bottom line is - the source, veracity, authenticity and pollution of Internet publications must always be verified before accepting any of the information as truthful. Most Americunts can't do the legwork or refuse to do so and are therefore easily deceived and taken advantage of. Most authors actually know this too, Snyder being no exception.
I consider the Interent to be infotainment and not much more. It's not the real world, doesn't report the real world except in rare cases, and has no bearing upon my own life. The NSA can go fuck itself.