I
suspect that 'Keynesianism” has little to do with Keynes.
Neo-liberalism and monetarism is also a cargo cult. Economics is
collapsing, along with the economy
The
Dangerous Blindspots of Clueless Keynesians
The
Keynesian model is a Cargo Cult, mired in a distant, romanticized
past where Central Planning, intervention and manipulation were
solutions rather than the root of the economy's fatal disease.
Charles
Hugh Smith
2
January, 2013
If
we want to trace today's policy failures back to the source, we find
ourselves at Richard Nixon's famous statement that "We are all
Keynesians now." The
fundamental Keynesian project is that the Central State and Central
Bank should manage market forces whenever the market turns down.
In
other words, the market only "works" when everything is
expanding: credit, profits, GDP and employment. Once any of those
turn down, the State and Central Bank "should" intervene to
force the market back into "growth."
The
Keynesian has two basic tools: the
State can borrow and spend money (fiscal stimulus) and the Central
Bank can create money and "inject" it into the economy
(monetary stimulus): quantitative easing, lowering interest rates,
extending unlimited credit to broker/dealer investment banks and
financial institutions, etc.
The
sharper the downturn, the greater the State/Central Bank
intervention. This accounts for the martial analogies of State/CB
responses: "bazookas," "nuclear option," etc., as
the market is overwhelmed with ever greater fiscal/monetary
firepower.
After
basically voiding the market's ability to price risk and assets, the
Keynesians believe the market will naturally resume pricing risk and
assets at "acceptable to Central Planning" levels once
fiscal and monetary stimulus is dialed back.
The
entire Keynesian Project has numerous blindspots. When
reality inconveniently fails to meet Keynesian expectations, reality
is ignored or massaged to suit the Keynesian Cargo Cult's belief
system.
For
example, the Grand Poo-Bah of the Keynesian Cargo Cult, Paul Krugman,
loves to repeat that massive fiscal-stimulus deficits haven't raised
interest rates, confounding doomsdayers, but he never mentions the
Federal Reserve's role in this magic: what
would interest rates be if the Fed wasn't buying hundreds of billions
of dollars of Treasury bonds every year?
The
honest position would for Keynesians to state that the Central Bank's
role is to print money to enable unlimited, fiscally reckless
spending by the Central State. But dishonesty is a modest Keynesian
fault compared to the blindspots in their core policies.
Here
is a partial list of Keynesian blindspots:
1.
The Keynesian Model no longer works; it is counter-productive and
destructive.
2.
Markets that have been managed by the Central State/Central Banks are
broken and no longer function in pricing risk and assets.
3.
Keynesians are incapable of recognizing opportunity cost: the money
they borrow and squander on sinkholes is no longer available for
productive uses.
4.
Keynesians are blind to the difference between an investment that
yields a positive return and a sinkhole that sucks scarce capital
away from productive uses.
5.
Keynesians are incapable of recognizing institutionalized moral
hazard is the inevitable consequence of flooding the financial sector
with cheap, easy money.
6.
Keynesians are blind to the fact that cheap, easy money at near-zero
rates destroys the premium on real capital (saved cash), fatally
distorting the economy and finance.
7.
The Keynesians are blind to the eventual consequences of higher
interest rates on rapidly rising sovereign debt. What's left of the
private market for bonds eventually recognizes that Central Planning
has pushed the risk of default or currency depreciation much higher.
That will push interest rates higher, unless the central Bank buys
essentially all newly issued Treasury debt.
Regardless
of who buys the debt, increasing sums of national income are diverted
to pay interest on debt taken on to fund marginal-return Bridges to
Nowhere, starving the State and economy of income and investment
capital. Default is the only possible endgame when debt rises faster
than income and productivity.
8.
Keynesians are blind to diminishing returns: ever-higher debt
produces ever-smaller returns.
I
have often identified Keynesian economists and the Federal Reserve as
cargo cults.
After
the U.S. won World War II in the Pacific Theater, its forces left
huge stockpiles of goods behind on remote South Pacific islands
because it wasn’t worth taking it all back to America.
After
the Americans left, some islanders, nostalgic for the seemingly
endless fleet of ships loaded with technological goodies, started
Cargo Cults that believed magical rituals and incantations would
bring the ships of “free” wealth back. Some mimicked technology
by painting radio dials on rocks and using the phantom radio to “call
back” the free-prosperity ships.
The
Keynesians are like deluded members of a farcical Cargo Cult. They
ignore the reality of debt, rising interest payments and the
resulting debt-serfdom in their belief that money spent
indiscriminately on friction, fraud, speculation and malinvestment
will magically call back the fleet of rapid growth.
To
the Keynesian, a Bridge to Nowhere is equally worthy of borrowed
money as a high-tech factory. They are unable to distinguish between
sterile sand and fertilizer, and unable to grasp that ever-rising
debt leaves America a nation of wealthy banks and increasingly
impoverished debt-serfs.
The
Cargo Cult faithful do not understand diminishing returns: at
some point, the interest on skyrocketing debt drains income and
capital from potentially productive investments to pay for previous
unproductive spending on fraud, friction and malinvestments, starving
the economy of productive investment.
"Free
money" creates moral hazard, which means that those who can
borrow money for almost nothing and never have to pay it back act
entirely differently from those paying market rates for money and
backing their loan with real collateral that is at risk.
The
Keynesian definition of Heaven is World War II,
because that war "proved" that digging a gigantic hole
(global war) and filling it with trillions of dollars of borrowed
money is the perfect (and perhaps only) way to create enough
"aggregate demand" to lift an economy out of depression.
What
clueless Keynesians cannot see is that World War II was a one-off and
cannot be duplicated. The
Global War "solution" had a key characteristic that is
almost universally ignored.
Depression-era
calls to bulldoze homes to be rebuilt and destroy grain so it could
be regrown were rightly dismissed as malinvestment on a vast scale.
But war is more or less an equivalent malinvestment on a grand scale.
Hundreds of ships were built and then sunk, thousands of aircraft
were built and then shot down or lost, and monumental mountains of
provisions and supplies were manufactured and then either consumed or
lost to enemy submarines, bad weather, rot and a host of other
causes.
At
the end of the war, most of the leftover goods manufactured--ships,
tanks, aircraft, munitions, etc.--were mothballed or scrapped.
Despite
this staggering waste, the war spending launched a long boom. How did
it work this magic? One, it constructed new plant; unlike the
Keynesian calls to bulldoze houses so they could be rebuilt, the war
investment created factories that could then be converted to produce
goods.
More
importantly, the war spending created a vast pool of private
capital--what we call savings. As
resources were diverted to the war effort, rationing limited both the
manufacture and availability of consumer goods. Meanwhile, tens of
millions of people were put to work, either in the Armed Forces or in
the war manufacturing sector, and most had few opportunities to spend
money. Industrialists also piled up war profits.
Though
the 1930s Central Planning extend-and-pretend policies did not write
off the overhang of debt that had depressed the economy and destroyed
the market's ability to properly price risk and assets, this
gargantuan pool of private capital simply overwhelmed the remaining
debt overhang.
Third,
trust in the system was restored: the Federal government had
effectively "won the war" by printing money and drawing
upon the nation's vast surplus of energy and labor, and the
manufacturing and financial sectors had been brought to heel by the
extraordinary demands of the war and by legislation that had
responded to financial fraud and over-reach of the late 1920s.
Keynesians
are blind to the fact that the root of "capitalism" is
capital. Capitalism
requires two fundamentals--capital to invest and open markets for
goods and services that transparently price risk, assets, hedges and
goods.
Note
that debt, and fiscal and monetary intervention are not essential to
capitalism. Indeed, if we explore the roots of modern capitalism in
the 14th and 15th centuries, we find that commercial credit and
hedges were the key ingredients of success, not debt. Lacking
sufficient coinage to handle the rising volume of trade, merchants
settled accounts at the great trading fairs in Europe.
Long,
risky trade voyages were hedged with the equivalent of options and
limited stock companies that distributed risk for a price. Leverage
was limited by the transparency and appetite for risk.
Compare
that with Bernanke's Keynesian policies, all of which severely punish
savers (i.e. the accumulation of capital) and reward leverage and
debt. By
lowering interest rates to zero, Bernanke has imposed the opposite of
the World War II experience of forced savings--he has made cash into
trash and pushed everyone into risk assets.
By
making credit dirt-cheap and backstopping financial-sector losses
(i.e. institutionalizing moral hazard), Bernanke has destroyed the
market's ability to discipline malinvestment and openly price risk
and assets.
World
War II launched a boom precisely because private capital
accumulation/savings were enforced; when the war ended, there was a
vast pool of capital available for investment and consumption.
Keynesian
policy is to punish capital accumulation and reward leveraged debt
expansion. Rather
than enforce the market's discipline and transparent pricing of risk,
debt and assets, Keynesians have explicitly set out to re-inflate
destructive, massively unproductive credit bubbles.
This
is why the Central Planning Keynesian policies has failed so
completely, and why they will continue to fail. The Keynesians are
not engaged in capitalism, they are engaged in the destruction of
capital, productive investment and the open pricing of risk, debt and
assets. The
markets are not allowed to price risk, capital and assets, so the
economy is crippled. The Keynesian model is a Cargo Cult, mired in a
distant, romanticized past where Central Planning, intervention and
manipulation were solutions rather than the root of the economy's
fatal disease.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.