World’s
glaciers have new size estimate
26
October, 2012
By
Becky Oskin, OurAmazingPlanet Staff Writer
23
October 2012
(LiveScience.com)
– The relatively small glaciers that drape the planet's mountains
will play an important role in future sea level rise, according to a
new study that estimated glaciers' collective size.
Researchers
calculated the ice thickness for 171,000 glaciers worldwide,
excluding the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, which hold the bulk
of Earth's frozen water. Through a combination of direct satellite
observations and modeling, they determined the total volume of ice
tied up in the glaciers is nearly 41,000 cubic miles (170,000 cubic
kilometers), plus or minus 5,000 cubic miles (21,000 cubic km).
If
all the glaciers were to melt, global sea levels would rise almost 17
inches (43 centimeters), the scientists found.
The
study, published in the 11 October 2012 issue of the Journal of
Geophysical Research, is an improvement on previous estimates of the
global ice volume because it uses a physical approach, said lead
study author Matthias Huss, a glaciologist at the University of
Fribourg in Switzerland.
The
glacier count comes from the recently released Randolph Glacier
Inventory and global topography from NASA satellite data.
"To
date, the volume of glaciers was only estimated using very simple
empirical equations with high uncertainties," Huss told
OurAmazingPlanet in an email interview. "Our new method not only
provides an estimate of the ice volume, but allows calculating local
ice thickness on a fine grid for each of the 200,000 glaciers
worldwide," he said. [Image Gallery: Glaciers Before and After]
Compared
with the potential sea level rise from the Greenland and Antarctic
ice sheets, the volume of land-based glaciers is relatively small,
Huss said. For example, completely melting the Greenland ice sheet
would add 23 feet (7 meters) to the average global sea level,
according to a 2007 report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC).
But
mountain glaciers are still a concern because they "react very
fast to higher temperatures and a considerable retreat is very likely
in the next decades," Huss said. […]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.