OPEC
Has Lost The Power To Lower The Price of Oil
Gregor
MacDonald
22
May, 2012
There’s
been a lot of excitement in the past year over the rise of North
American oil production and the promise of increased oil production
across the whole of the Americas in the years to come. National
security experts and other geo-political observers have waxed poetic
at the thought of this emerging, hemispheric strength in energy
supply.
What’s
less discussed, however, is the negligible effect this supply swing
is having on lowering the price of oil, due to the fact that,
combined with OPEC production, aggregate global production remains
mostly flat.
But
there’s another component to this new belief in the changing global
landscape for oil: the dawning awareness that OPEC’s power has
finally gone into decline. You can read the celebration of OPEC’s
waning in power in practically every publication from Foreign
Policy to
various political blogs and op-eds. David Ignatius of the Washington
Post wrapped
up nearly all of the recent claims in a nice bundle in his May 4,
2012 piece, An
Economic Boom Ahead?,
when he quoted PFC Energy’s David West:
“This is the energy equivalent of the Berlin Wall coming down,” contends West. “Just as the trauma of the Cold War ended in Berlin, so the trauma of the 1973 oil embargo is ending now.” The geopolitical implications of this change are striking: “We will no longer rely on the Middle East, or compete with such nations as China or India for resources.”
(Source)
While
it’s true that the Americas hold great promise to convert natural
gas resources to higher production levels, that is not the case with
oil. The celebration of a geo-political swing in energy power
therefore misses a crucial point: No
region -- from OPEC to Non-OPEC, from Africa to Russia -- has the
single-handed ability to lower the price of oil now, because none can
bring on new supply quickly enough for a long-enough sustained period
of time.
And
there is more to this story than meets the eye.
History of OPEC
For
over 30 years, OPEC has produced less
than half of the world’s oil.
Indeed, as of today, OPEC produces only a little more than 40% of the
world’s oil. But most of the world’s spare
capacity has
been held by Gulf State producers. Thus OPEC, primarily Saudi Arabia,
has long been able to control the price of oil in not one, but two,
directions. Historically this has meant that the concentration of oil
pricing power resided with OPEC and its largest producer, Saudi
Arabia.
But
starting in 2005, global oil markets sensed that OPEC was only able
to influence the price of oil in one direction: higher, by lowering
output. OPEC’s ability to lower prices started to crack, break up,
and generally fail as the first phase of oil’s repricing headed
into 2008. Indeed, OPEC raised production several times in the
2004-2008 period, attempting to restrain oil prices as it moved to
protect the global economy from an oil shock. However, the oil
market, which was going through a fundamental transition at the time,
as it reoriented itself towards insatiable, price-insensitive demand
from Asia -- paid little attention.
Instead,
supply disruptions at small producers and in small regions had a
greater influence on oil price (pushing it higher) than OPEC's
influence on attempting to push the price lower.
It’s
actually not clear that OPEC has had any measurable influence on
restraining oil prices for years. Summer hurricanes in the Gulf of
Mexico, unrest and outages in the Niger Delta, and various strikes
presented greater upward pressure on oil prices than upward OPEC
supply changes.
The Mythology of OPEC
There
is a trailing cultural myth, therefore, (which is nothing more than a
hangover from 30 years ago), that OPEC can mount swift, price-killing
upsurges of production. But as the below chart shows, OPEC production
has made no progress in at all in the seven years since 2005, as oil
began its price transition.
As
oil rose above $50 in 2005, eventually reaching $90 in 2007, and then
on to levels above $140 in 2008, OPEC production both rose and fell,
but without any reliable correlation to price. In the aftermath of
2008, OPEC production has correlated better with the recovery in oil
prices. But again, the rise in OPEC production has only come back
towards the previous highs from last decade. Here is a recent news
story rather breathlessly discussing the most recent OPEC production
levels this year:
Acting to mitigate market nervousness amid Iran supply fears, OPEC on Thursday said it was pumping more oil than the market needs—at levels not seen since summer 2008—and expressed a cautiously optimistic note on demand. The cautious optimism, combined with a production boost sufficient to cover all of Iran's oil exports, is likely to further stabilize oil markets, where volatility by some measures has already smoothed in recent weeks. In its latest monthly market report, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries said its crude production was 32.42 million barrels a day in March, up 317,000 barrels a day from the previous month.
Yes,
but there’s a neglected point to make: these production levels are
not special. Not meaningful. And are not newsworthy in any sense.
Production at/above 32 million barrels a day? That level has been
reached at least 4-5 times since 2005, with at best weak correlation
to price changes.
Let's
take a closer look at the global share of oil supply, divided in two
between non-OPEC and OPEC production.
Non-OPEC vs. OPEC Oil Production
There
are several possible conclusions to draw from the above chart, which
shows that non-OPEC provided nearly 58% of global crude oil supply in
2011, and OPEC provided 42%.
- Non-OPEC is the domain of private oil companies, and has managed to increase its market share over the past 30 years through competition and through the use of technology.
- OPEC’s market share has stagnated, possibly due to the predominance of state-run oil companies and the interference of political structures.
- Non-OPEC has the pricing power, due to its larger market share.
- Or perhaps OPEC still retains the pricing power, due to its greater quantity of spare capacity.
There’s
an element of truth in each of these observations.
Many
also believe that both OPEC and non-OPEC could be producing a
lot more oil.
In the case of OPEC, many harbor the view that state-run producers
and governments are sitting on massive, hidden spare capacity and
retaining it as a cartel to manipulate oil prices higher. In the case
of non-OPEC, many believe that environmentalists, regulations, and
other limits placed by democratically-elected governments are
suppressing a wall of supply that could come to market easily if only
the oil is ‘set free.’
These
views, however, are not only extreme but shaky. They are typical of
the kind of grand claims that fit people’s worries and suspicions,
rather than fitting any empirical data. The fact is that OPEC spare
capacity has been under pressure for some time despite persistent
belief to the contrary, with estimates running below 3 mbpd, or even
below 2 mbpd. (For recent commentary on OPEC spare capacity, see A
Model of Oil Prices by
Chris Nelder). The case for hidden, held-back oil capacity in OPEC is
weak, especially as domestic populations in the Gulf have
dramatically increased the consumption of their own oil.
Meanwhile,
non-OPEC large producers like Russia have significantly increased
production this past decade. And regions like North America have been
able to slow declines. Western oil companies -- which dominate
non-OPEC production -- have scoured the globe looking to replace
their reserves, but largely to no avail. This is why ExxonMobil and
ConocoPhilips eventually gave up, capitulated, and bought natural gas
assets instead. By doing so, they followed in the steps of Royal
Dutch Shell, which had taken the natural gas pathway years earlier.
Therefore,
a fact about non-OPEC production that was unknown even to the
industry ten years ago is now very plain: There just isn’t a vast
quantity of new oil that can come online easily and inexpensively
outside of OPEC-controlled regions. Only Russia, the largest non-OPEC
producer and now the largest single country producer in the world --
eclipsing even Saudi Arabia -- was able to significantly increase
production.
A Window into Non-OPEC Supply: Russia
Two
charts will tell us all we need to know about the limits facing
non-OPEC crude oil production. First, let’s take a look at total
non-OPEC production on an annual basis:
Just
as with OPEC production, little if any progress has been made in the
past seven years. This has been a complete surprise to most analysts,
especially within the industry itself. Who would have thought that
with a regime change in oil prices, non-OPEC could not sustainably
increase production to much higher levels? Instead, non-OPEC
production remains stuck around a ceiling, just like OPEC.
The
Big Reveal comes, however, when we take a look at non-OPEC
supply without
Russia.
Without
Russia, non-OPEC supply has actually lost about a million barrels a
day of production in the last ten years. This speaks volumes to the
quickly-rising costs of bringing on a new barrel of oil in non-OPEC
regions, which we will discuss further in Part II of this report.
The Price of Oil When OPEC Is Powerless
Let’s
imagine for a moment that OPEC could, if it chose to, pour an extra 3
mbpd of oil on the world market. And that by doing so, it could lower
the price of WTIC oil to $90 or less. What would that accomplish? And
for how long would such “lower” prices last?
In Part
II: The Cruel Math of the Marginal Barrel,
we explain that while fluctuations in economic activity can certainly
raise and lower the price of oil, there are deeper structural reasons
why OPEC -- even with its spare capacity -- can no longer sustainably
“lower” the price of oil. Moreover, we will discuss how,
paradoxically, any surge of supply from OPEC which did persuasively
lower the price of oil could wind up having the opposite effect on
price eventually thereafter.
Surprising?
Yes, but not strange or unlikely, for reasons we will explain.
Finally, we conclude that oil’s floor
price -- outside
of volatile 30-90 day periods -- is higher than ever before. This
will make for a large surprise, should another acute phase of the
financial crisis rock oil prices lower over a 2-3 month period.
Click
here to access Part II of
this report (free
executive summary; paid enrollment required for full access).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.