U.S.
downplayed effect of Deepwater Horizon oil spill on whales, emails
reveal
25
October, 2012
The
images from the summer of 2010 were undoubtedly gruesome: the carcass
of a young sperm whale, decayed and partially eaten by sharks,
sighted at sea south of the Deepwater Horizon oil well.
It
was the first confirmed sighting of a dead whale since the BP oil
spill in the Gulf of Mexico in April that year – a time of huge
public interest in the fate of whales, dolphins, sea turtles, and
other threatened animals – and yet US government officials
suppressed the first reports of the discovery and blocked all images
until now.
The
photographs, along with a cache of emails obtained by the campaign
group Greenpeace under freedom of information provisions and made
available to the Guardian, offer a rare glimpse into how many whales
came into close contact with the gushing BP well during the oil
spill.
They
also show Obama administration officials tightly controlling
information about whales and other wildlife caught up in the
disaster.
The
plight of wildlife caught up in the oil spill – especially
endangered species such as sea turtles and sperm whales – has
enormous financial implications for BP.
The
oil company asked a judge in New Orleans this week to finalise its
$7.8bn (£4.8bn) settlement for economic damages arising from the
spill. But BP still faces claims from the federal government for
environmental damages, and accounting for wildlife killed as a direct
result of the spill – from dolphins to turtles to whales – will
be critical to the final bill.
"In
the settlement with BP, an endangered species or any animal killed by
the spill matters," said Kert Davies, research director of
Greenpeace.
That
looming legal struggle was apparently already on the minds of
officials at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA) when crew aboard the research vessel, Pisces, spotted a dead
sperm whale on the morning of 15 June 2010.
The
discovery was the first confirmed sighting of a dead whale since the
blow-out on the Deepwater Horizon that April.
The
carcass, which was decomposed and had been fed on by sharks, was
spotted about 77 miles south of the Deepwater Horizon oil site.
Meanwhile,
NOAA observers on another vessel at the well site that same day
spotted five whales, including a juvenile, covered in oil. "Observers
noticed that the young whale was covered in oil sheen," the
detection report notes. "It is very possible that these adults
were covered in the same oil as the juvenile whale was covered in as
the water quality was very poor with iridescent sheens all over the
surface."
The
detection report goes on to describe a large plume of smoke rising
from the water, from the controlled burns used to stop the oil from
reaching the shoreline. "Small brown globs of what appear to be
oil and possibly oil dispersant infiltrate the water."
There
is no further indication in the email about what happened to the
group of whales – or indeed any of the whales that may have been
exposed to BP oil.
"Unless
animals are tagged, they are nearly impossible to relocate as they
move great distances quickly and stay submerged for prolonged periods
of time," a NOAA spokesman, Scott Smullen, said in an email.
In
any event, the government would not disclose how many – if any –
whales might have died or been directly affected by the BP oil spill
because of legal reasons, he said. "Due to ongoing litigation
issues, we are not able to discuss this aspect of our investigation,"
Smullen wrote in an email on Wednesday.
In
contrast, the discovery of the decomposed carcass set off a flurry of
emails – with repeated instructions from NOAA officials to crew
aboard the Pisces not to release information or photographs. […]
The
gag order rankled with some aboard the Pisces, as an 16 June 2010
email from the ship's commanding officer Lieutenant Commander Jeremy
Adams suggests. […]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.