Showing posts with label al-Qaida. Show all posts
Showing posts with label al-Qaida. Show all posts

Monday, 16 June 2014

The battle for Baghdad is on

It's happening, as was predicted 2 days ago. ISIS troops are in the suburbs of Baghdad and attacking the airport.

Just a couple of hours ago the official news was that the advance had been stopped and even repelled.

Some of us knew better.

US to evacuate Baghdad embassy staff
The US embassy in Baghdad is evacuating personnel and increasing military security after militants captured vast swathes of territory and advanced toward the capital, officials say.


16 June, 2014


It was unclear how many staff members would be evacuated from the mission. Located within the heavily fortified Green Zone that houses much of the international presence in the city, the US embassy is the largest in the world.

State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said the staff would only be "temporarily relocated" to US consulates in Basra in the south and Arbil in the northern Kurdish territories. Neither area is currently threatened by the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant militants.

Other staff will be flown to the US embassy in the Jordanian capital of Amman, where they will work on Iraq-related issues.

Rear Admiral John Kirby, the Department of Defence spokesman, said a "small number of DOD personnel are augmenting State Department security assets in Baghdad to help ensure the safety of our facilities".

Kirby indicated that the embassy staff were being relocated using commercial, charter and State Department aircraft, and that the US military also had air assets available as needed.

"The Embassy of the United States in Baghdad remains open and will continue to engage daily with Iraqis and their elected leaders - supporting them as they strengthen Iraq's constitutional processes and defend themselves from imminent threats," Psaki said in a statement.

She stressed that Washington "strongly supports Iraq and its people" as they face the militants' onslaught.

American contractors working for the Iraqi government to train local security forces on US military equipment are already being evacuated out of the country.
Additional US government security personnel will join the staff at the embassy in Baghdad "as a result of ongoing instability and violence in certain areas of Iraq", Psaki said.

She urged Americans in the country to "exercise caution and limit travel" to the provinces of Anbar, Diyala, Kirkuk, Nineveh and Salah ad Din, as well as make emergency contingency plans, maintain security awareness at all times and register their travel with the State Department.

Washington has responded to the sweeping unrest by deploying an aircraft carrier group to the Gulf.

President Barack Obama has said he is weighing "all options," while ruling out any return of US combat troops to Iraq, a country they left nearly three years ago after a bloody and costly occupation launched in 2003.


Tweets from the last hour


: Tribe fighters spokesperson: Our military operations toward have begun..

IRAQI MILITARY BASE IN TAJI 20 MILES NORTH OF BAGHDAD HAS FALLEN TO ISIS (VIA )



BREAKING NEWS: Baghdad airport is now under attack by ISIS rockets.

Monday, 6 January 2014

Developments in Iraq


Islamists exploit weak border to fight in Iraq and Syria
Iraqi air strikes kill 34 as army tries to dislodge al-Qaida militants in city of Ramadi, near Syrian border


5 January, 2014

The Iraqi military were on Sunday night trying to dislodge al-Qaida militants in the city of Ramadi, near the Syrian border, using air strikes which left at least 34 people dead.


The action came as al-Qaida fighters were also reported to have taken control of Falluja and underlined the fragility of Syria and Iraq's shared border, which is becoming increasingly exposed as standoffs with Islamist militants in both countries appear to be reaching a defining phase.


Iraqi officials say reinforcements of al-Qaida-linked militants are crossing from Syria into Iraq. At the same time, members of the group are fending off fierce attacks across northern Syria.


The US secretary of state, John Kerry, on a visit to the Middle East, said he was extremely worried by developments in Iraq, which the US military left in late 2010 after occupying it for nearly eight years.


"We are very, very concerned about the efforts of al-Qaida and the Islamic State of Iraq in the Levant – which is affiliated with al-Qaida – who are trying to assert their authority not just in Iraq, but in Syria," Kerry said.


"These are the most dangerous players in that region. Their barbarism against the civilians in Ramadi and Falluja and against Iraqi security forces is on display for everyone in the world to see." The UK also said it was "deeply concerned".


As the Syrian war has intensified over the past two years, militants have also been crossing from Iraq to Syria – where they have gradually asserted a hardline Islamic presence in the east and north, splintering an insurrection that started as a bid to replace Bashar al-Assad as president.


The jihadist push has instead helped transform the revolution in the north into a starkly sectarian conflict, which the renewed insurgency in Iraq both feeds off and amplifies.


The militant advance in Iraq's Anbar province, where Falluja and the nearby city of Ramadi are situated, and in other areas surrounding Baghdad over the past year has also re-intensified sectarian divisions remaining from a vicious civil war in 2005-07.


But now al-Qaida's hold on parts of northern Syria is facing its first sustained threat, while its latest insurgency in Anbar is also under challenge from tribal leaders and the Iraqi army.


The Iraqi army said it was moving advanced weapons to Falluja, which the US had delivered over the past month following a request from the prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki.


It has as yet not been prepared to use them as it tries to broker alliances with the region's powerful tribes, some of whom are backing the militants, while others are supporting the army.


The standoff shows no sign of abating, with Iraqi officials preparing for an attack on Falluja, where militants twice fought a withering assault from the Americans in 2004 in the largest battles Washington had fought since Vietnam.


A spokesman for Maliki said: "We need the help of the Americans. We only need logistical support and them to supply us with weapons. We wanted to intervene before but we didn't have the weapons to do that.


"It is hard to control the borders as we know what the situation in Syria is like and there are other countries who are supporting al-Qaida with weapons and logistics."


Iraq's deputy prime minister, Saleh al-Mutlaq, said he was hoping for the Falluja standoff to be resolved without the Iraqi army getting involved.


"How can an army fight their own people?" he said. "If the army intervene, this won't be forgotten by all Iraqis: Sunni and Shia.


"The borders are open between Syria and Iraq because of the financial and administrative corruption which helps co-ordinate things between al-Qaida in Iraq and Syria.


"Iraqis won't accept slipping [back] into civil war but if the Iraqi politicians won't … deal with all ethnicities in the right way, then everything is possible.


"The Americans brought lots of money and weapons which helped to create different militias. The leaders in Iraq are driven by hatred and the love of revenge."


Another Iraqi lawmaker, Izzat Shabander, said: "The situation right now is against al-Qaida in Anbar and the proof is that they are moving from Syria to help al-Qaida in Iraq with the fighting.


"The borders are open because of the current situation in Syria and because of the fragile security in the neighbouring provinces in Iraq like Anbar and Mosul."


In Syria, meanwhile, clashes between the opposition and Islamist fighters that started on Friday spread across the north, where the Islamic State of Iraq (Isis) group has led much of the fighting against the Assad regime in recent months while imposing a fundamentalist rule on the towns and villages it occupies.


Clashes spread from Idlib in the far north-west, through to the Aleppo countryside, with Friday's sporadic uprising having given way to co-ordinated attacks in numerous villages.


Syrian opposition members told the Guardian that Isis had used car bombs against them as they advanced into the Andana area near Idlib, which is a heartland of the group.


Heavy fighting was also reported at Azaz and Tal-Abbayad, near border crossings into Turkey.


The exiled Syrian opposition leadership in Istanbul released a statement praising the revolt. "The Syrian people made up their minds," it said.


"They expressed their rejection of the anti-revolution group. The Free Syria Army (FSA) echoed the Syrian people's choice. It has launched a number of operations to defend the Syrian people and deter the alien group.


"Clashes with Isis are inevitable if the Syrian people are able to achieve the goals of the revolution: toppling the Assad regime and establishing a democratic, civil and pluralistic state."


The opposition's influence over the fighting remains limited. The FSA once loosely answered to it, but has since been subsumed by power struggles that have produced reconfigured fighting units.


Saturday, 21 September 2013

Syria

Christian village Maaloula falls into jihadists' hands as Al-Qaeda grows in Syria


Inside Syria, the number of Al-Qaeda-linked extremists within the opposition ranks is reportedly growing. And they're not just fighting government troops but also their former rebel allies, with the fiercest battles taking place near the Turkish border. Civilians are also suffering with the ancient Christian village of Maaloula just one area to fall into the hands of jihadists. RT's correspondent in Syria Maria Finoshina reports.


Thursday, 8 August 2013

Yemen

The al-Qaeda'threat' may or may not exist, but a very real war is being waged by the United States

US drone strikes kill seven alleged al-Qaida members in Yemen
Attack in Shabwa province comes days after US government says intelligence showed increase in terrorist 'chatter



7 August, 2013


New US drone strikes reportedly killed seven alleged al-Qaida members in southern Yemen on Wednesday after the government in Sana'a claimed to have foiled a large-scale terrorist attack and the US and Britain evacuated their embassy staff.

Security officials told the Associated Press the latest drone attacks hit targets in Shabwa province, where residents reported seeing two vehicles and several bodies on fire.

The news came as details emerged in the capital of an ambitious plan by al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), a "franchise" of the global terrorist network, to attack oil installations and towns.

Rajeh Badi, press adviser to Prime Minister Mohammed Salem Basindwa, said the plot involved dozens of fighters in Yemeni army uniforms storming the facilities on Sunday night, and holding them. Yemeni officials spoke of a plan to take control of the Mina al-Dhaba oil terminal, which is run by Canada, in the Mukallah region on the Arabian Sea.

The US state department said on Tuesday that its decision to close its embassy and to repeat a call for all US citizens to leave the country had been prompted by a "specific and immediate threat."

US intelligence is reported to have earlier intercepted "chatter" indicating an impending terrorist attack, along with a conversation between the al-Qaida leader Ayman al-Zawahiri, who is believed to be in hiding in Pakistan, and Nasser al-Wuhayshi, the head of AQAP.

The New York Times said the conversation represented one of the most serious plots since the 9/11 attacks prompting the closure of 19 US embassies worldwide. Britain and several other western countries followed suit. "This was significant because it was the big guys talking, and talking about very specific timing for an attack or attacks," the New York Times quoted one official as saying.

Yemeni officials told AP they believe the motive for the planned attacks was retaliation for the killing of Wuhayshi's deputy, Said al-Shihri, who was critically wounded in a November drone strike and later died of his injuries.

The US response to the threat has triggered renewed criticism of the Obama adminstration's approach to Yemen, which is said to include tactics tried in Pakistan and Afghanistan but which are inappropriate to conditions in the Arab world's poorest and intensely tribal country.

"US efforts to decapitate the leadership of al-Qaida in the Arabian peninsula have resulted in the deaths of many civilians, yet there is no certainty as to who the targets really are," commented Christina Hellmich of Reading University. "The membership of AQAP remains unknown while the deaths worsen the problems for the US in the region, by supporting the political legitimacy of the jihadis as they struggle to establish a position in the contested state."

AQAP has attempted to mount several attacks on US soil, including a bid to bring down a passenger plane over Detroit in 2009 by a man wearing explosives in his underwear, and a failed plot to send bombs concealed in printers.

Earlier that year the group tried to assassinate the Saudi security chief, Prince Muhammad bin Nayef, with a bomb that was concealed on the attacker's body.

The Sana'a government said this week that it was hunting 25 named AQAP operatives it suspects of planning attacks.



Even Yemeni Government Spokesman Finds Foiled Plot Hard to Believe


7 August, 2013

Even the spokesman for the Yemeni embassy in Washington, D.C. is having a hard time believing a plot by al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula that the Yemeni government says it foiled.

Several news agencies -- including the BBC, the New York Times, and Bloomberg, among others -- reported this morning that the Yemeni government claimed it had stopped a large AQAP attack in Yemen's Hadhramaut province. As the BBC reported:
Yemeni government spokesman Rajeh Badi said the plot involved blowing up oil pipelines and taking control of certain cities -- including two ports in the south, one of which accounts for the bulk of Yemen's oil exports and is where a number of foreign workers are employed.
"There were attempts to control key cities in Yemen like Mukala and Bawzeer," said Mr Badi.
"This would be co-ordinated with attacks by al-Qaeda members on the gas facilities in Shebwa city and the blowing up of the gas pipe in Belhaf city."

That didn't sound right to Mohammed Albasha, a spokesman for the Yemeni embassy, and he said so on his personal Twitter account:



For the record: #AQAP doesn't have the man power nor the capabilities to capture a city the size of Mukkala in Hadramout #Yemen #CommonSense
14 RETWEETS 4 FAVORITES

Word. | RT @gregorydjohnsen Along with many I'm skeptical of the reports that AQAP was about to seize ports in #Yemen




@BaFana3 @gregorydjohnsen I second that
1 RETWEET


AQAP notably tried to seize Yemeni towns in 2011 and 2012, as the country's popular uprising drew the military's attention to the capital, Sanaa. And it was a strategic blunder for the organization. AQAP and its political arm, Ansar al-Sharia, alienated the towns they occupied and were ousted by the Yemeni military and "popular committees" -- militias formed by local sheikhs to retake the area. Since being pushed out in mid-2012, AQAP has remained in hiding.
The New York Times was more measured in its appraisal of the threat, reporting that the target was not whole cities, but rather a specific Canadian-operated oil installation in the Hadhramaut port capital of Mukallah. But even this seemed strange to some Yemen experts.
"[Yemeni authorities are] claiming that this plot that they've foiled includes attacks planned against oil pipelines here, specifically to take control of several ports in Yemen," Iona Craig, a correspondent for the Times of London, told BBC World Service from Sanaa. "Now, the oil pipelines get attacked on a regular basis -- in fact, they've been blown up twice in the last two weeks -- so that's not unusual, and it's not always related to al Qaeda." In fact, oil pipelines are frequently targeted by Yemeni tribal groups as a means of forcing concessions from the central government.
Adding to the dubious nature of the report: The Yemeni government did not specify how it thwarted the supposed attack. The United States conducted an airstrike in neighboring Shabwa province on Wednesday, killing seven, but that hardly seems sufficient to stop what was, by the Yemeni government's account, to be a large-scale attack.
The Yemeni government has a history of making outsized claims about its counterterrorism successes; on at least two occasions, officials claimed to have killed AQAP's deputy emir, Said al-Shihri, only for Shihri to release statements demonstrating that he was still very much alive. But there's little wonder why the Yemeni government would claim a victory now. With the U.S. diplomatic community in lockdown in response to a terror threat emanating from Yemen -- Craig, speaking to the BBC, describes the persistent hum of P-3 Orion electronic surveillance planes circling Sanaa today -- the government has every reason to try and demonstrate that it's doing its part in combating AQAP. As for what precisely that part has consisted of -- well, Yemeni officials have been more tight-lipped on that front.



Yemen Plot the New Excuse for Not Closing Gitmo
Officials Say Detainees Won't Be Released to Yemen


7 August, 2013
Two and a half months after Obama Administration officials indicated that they were preparing to “speed up” plans to let detainees cleared for release from Guantanamo Bay actually return home, officials have a new excuse not to do so.
Fresh off of Yemeni President Abd-Rabbu Mansour Hadi’s visit to DC, at which he pressed President Obama to release the detainees, suddenly the focus on a huge plot in Yemen has officials saying that any plans to do so are indefinitely “on hold.”
Of course in the two and a half months between then and now there was no indication that officials were actually considering any serious releases of detainees in the first place. Now they just have a new excuse.
It’s particularly noteworthy that Hadi’s visit came after the first drone strikes aimed at the plot were launched but before it went public, giving Hadi a chance to feign “pressing” the US for the detainees’ release shortly before the excuse would come to life.


Al-Qaeda will continue to exist as long as the US needs it


Obama: Al-Qaeda ‘On the Way to Defeat’
Insists US 'Not Terrorized' by Terrorists

7 August, 2013
While reiterating that al-Qaeda remains a threat “to the homeland,” President Obama insisted today that his military offensives have decimated the group’s leadership and it is “on the way to defeat.”

Obama went on to insist that “those who cowardly attack civilians” don’t understand his position that the US “do not get terrorized” by terrorism and will keep up its current foreign policy in place to prove that Americans “will never retreat from the world.”
The comments come as the US has closed dozens of embassies abroad over fear of terrorist attacks, and has issued a global travel warning for the rest of the month, urging civilians to avoid any travel anywhere on the planet.
He was addressing Camp Pendleton Marines at the time, and it is possible that the broad position of the speech was penned before all of the embassy closures, though Obama did note that the recent days are a “reminder” of the global war on terror.


Wednesday, 19 June 2013

Americans to talk peace with Teliban


US drops demand Taliban renounce al-Qaeda to allow talks to progress
America will engage in its first formal direct talks with the Taliban on Thursday, after dropping its long-standing demand that the movement renounce ties with al-Qaeda in order for them to progress.


18 January, 2013


The US will engage in its first formal direct talks with the Taliban on Thursday, according to officials, in a milestone on the road to peace after more than a decade of war.

The first meeting will take place in Doha, the Qatari capital, after the Taliban opened their first official overseas office and Washington dropped its long-standing demand that the movement renounce ties with al-Qaeda as a precondition for the talks.

The US will have its first formal meeting with the Taliban, and indeed first meeting with the Taliban for several years, in a couple of days in Doha,” a senior official with Obama administration said.

Afghan peace negotiators will also travel to Qatar for talks, according to President Hamid Karzai, speaking as Nato officially transferred authority to Afghan national forces on the ground in Afghanistan.

Just hours after the agreement was announced, four American soldiers were killed by insurgents during an attack on Bagram Air Base. There were very few details of the attack, but a US official said the soldiers were killed by "indirect fire", possibly rockets or mortars.

The challenges ahead were further underlined however by a suicide attack only a few miles from where Mr Karzai was speaking.The Taliban has repeatedly refused to meet Afghan peace envoys.

After months of behind-the-scenes negotiations however, including some in Norway according to Espen Barth Eide, the country’s foreign minister, the movement has now agreed to open the Doha office to facilitate talks.

The office is to open dialogue between the Taliban and the world,” Taliban spokesman Zabiullah Mujahid said, although he made no reference to peace talks or the Afghan government. “The Islamic Emirate Of Afghanistan [the group’s formal name] doesn’t want any threats from Afghanistan soil to other countries, and neither permits anyone to threaten other countries using Afghanistan soil.

We support a political and peaceful solution that ends Afghanistan’s occupation, and guarantees the Islamic system and nationwide security.”

None of the parties are expecting any imminent breakthrough, but US officials described the opening of negotiations with the Taliban as an “important development” on the road to reconciliation.

They were at pains to be realistic about the road ahead, conceding that levels of trust between parties were “extremely low”.

Officials said the first meeting would simply be an “exchange of agendas” in which both sides laid out what issues they wanted to address. It could be followed by a second meeting in coming weeks.

Recalling the Northern Ireland peace process took years to complete, senior Obama administration officials said the Taliban office was “the first step on what – if it is successful – will be a very long road”, adding that there was “no guarantee that this process will happen quickly, if at all.”

One official significantly added that a requirement for the Taliban to drop relations with al Qaeda – something which had stymied previous attempts at direct talks – was no longer necessary in order for them to progress.

We’ve long had a demand on the Taliban that they make a statement that distances themselves from the movement from international terrorism, but made clear that we didn’t expect immediately for them to break ties with al Qaeda, because that’s an outcome of the negotiation process,” the official said.

President Barack Obama, speaking at the G8 summit in Northern Ireland, called the opening of the Taliban’s political office an important step toward reconciliation between the group and the Afghan government, although he predicted the road ahead will be long and complicated.

David Cameron, the Prime Minister, gave his backing to the talks.

We need to match the security response in Afghanistan ... with a political process to try to make sure as many people as possible give up violence, give up an armed struggle and join the political process,” he said. “It’s the right thing to do – of course it involves all sorts of difficulties.”

Graeme Smith, of the International Crisis Group, said members of the High Peace Council themselves do not expect much progress.

The main forces that were killing a lot of insurgents in recent years are leaving,” he said. “The insurgents don’t have a whole load of incentive to negotiate until they find out where the military balance lies after the withdrawal.”

Speaking at a heavily defended army academy just outside Kabul, Mr Karzai told Nato officials that the handover would help cement support for the Afghan security forces.

From tomorrow, our security and defence forces will now be in the lead,” he said. “From here, all security responsibility and all security leadership will be taken by our brave forces.”

Some 97,000 international troops remain in the country. From now until the end of next year their role will be largely to train and advise local forces.

The transfer of the last 95 districts from Nato to Afghan control include some of the areas still affected by Taliban attacks, including Kandahar — the spiritual home of the movement — and territories that border Pakistan.

Anders Fogh Rasmussen, Nato secretary-general, was in Kabul for the handover. He said the coalition will help militarily if and when needed but will no longer plan, execute or lead operations.

Ten years ago, there were no Afghan national security forces. Five years ago, Afghan forces were a fraction of what they are today,” he said.

Now you have 350,000 Afghan troops and police. A formidable force. And time and again, we have seen them dealing quickly and competently with complex attacks. Defeating the enemies of Afghanistan, and defending and protecting the Afghan people.”


US to join direct peace talks in Qatar with Taliban over Afghanistan's future
'Peace and reconciliation' milestone comes after US drops request for formal rejection of al-Qaida as precondition to talks



18 January, 2013

The US is to open direct talks with Taliban leaders within days, it was revealed on Tuesday, after Washington agreed to drop a series of preconditions that have previously held back negotiations over the future of Afghanistan.

In a major milestone in the 12-year-old war, political representatives of the Taliban will shortly meet Afghan and US officials in Doha, the capital of Qatar, to discuss an agenda for what US officials called "peace and reconciliation" before further talks take place with Afghan government representatives soon after.

The move came on the day that Nato forces handed official control of nationwide security to Afghan troops. Less than 12 hours later, the US confirmed that four US personnel died at Bagram air base near Kabul, in what was thought to be a mortar attack.

Earlier the Taliban, in a statement announcing their plans for peace talks and an office in Qatar, said they would not allow anyone to threaten or harm other countries from Afghan soil – a move senior US administration officials described as an important first step to the Taliban severing ties with al-Qaida.

The US has agreed that a formal rejection of al-Qaida by the Taliban leadership would now be a "negotiating aim" rather than a precondition for talks. It will also seek a commitment from the Taliban to end its insurgency in Afghanistan and recognise women's rights in the country.

"This is an important first step but it will be a long road," said one senior US official. "We have long said this conflict won't be won on the battlefield, which is why we support the opening of this [Doha] office."

White House officials say they believe the Taliban delegation at the talks represents the movement's leadership, and includes more radical groups such as the Haqqani network. Officials said the US would have a direct role in the talks starting starting this week in Doha, but the substantive negotiations over the future of Afghanistan would then be led by the Afghan government.

Speaking later, Ben Rhodes, deputy national security adviser, said: "The United States will be supporting a process that is fundamentally Afghan-led … We can play a role in talking to the Taliban as well in supporting that peace process – and because we have issues of our own to bring up with them."

A Taliban spokesman said the group was opening the Doha office to "reach understanding and initiate talks with countries of the world for the purpose of improving relations with them", and to support a peaceful, political solution to end the "occupation of Afghanistan".

The proposal for a Doha office has been on the table since 2011, and several senior Taliban figures have been living in Qatar for many months now, but the group had not publicly embraced plans for peace talks.

In Kabul, Afghan president Hamid Karzai said he hoped the opening of the Taliban office would bring the start of talks between the High Peace Council he set up to lead government negotiation efforts, and the insurgents.

However the Afghan leader, who has long been lukewarm about efforts to set up a Taliban base in Qatar, also called for any negotiations to move back to Afghanistan as soon as possible. "We hope that our brothers the Taliban also understand that the process will move to our country soon," he told a news conference in Kabul, although US officials stressed that moving talks to Afghanistan would take time.

Karzai also announced that Nato forces had handed official control of nationwide security to Afghan troops on Tuesday. Foreign soldiers will still be fighting on the ground and supporting Afghans with air power, medical evacuation and other key capacities until the end of next year.

Barack Obama is understood to have informed G8 leaders of the breakthrough at a dinner at the Northern Ireland summit on Monday night.

The deal on talks with the Taliban was partly brokered by Pakistan and the emir of Qatar after "months of diplomatic spadework" also involving Germany, Norway and the UK. In 2011, Hillary Clinton suggested that Taliban leaders would have to renounce violence for a peace process to work.

"Over the past two years, we have laid out our unambiguous red lines for reconciliation with the insurgents: they must renounce violence; they must abandon their alliance with al-Qaida; and they must abide by the constitution of Afghanistan," she said. "Those are necessary outcomes of any negotiation. This is the price for reaching a political resolution and bringing an end to the military actions that are targeting their leadership and decimating their ranks."

But on Tuesday, that position appeared to have soften somewhat. "We don't expect them to break ties with al-Qaida [immediately]," said one of the US officials speaking on an off-the-record conference call. "That is an outcome of the process." He said the expected Taliban statement opposing the use of Afghan soil for foreign attacks was "a first step in distancing them from international terrorism".

The Taliban also appeared to have softened on their long-term demand that foreign troops leave before talks can start. Karzai, despite his misgivings about overseas talks and initial opposition to the Qatar office visited the Gulf state twice this year, apparently paving the way for Tuesday's breakthrough.

Afghan president Hamid Karzai, who has always said he would prefer talks to take place in Afghanistan, was initially lukewarm about the Qatar plans, but has visited the state twice this year, apparently paving the way for today's breakthrough.