Showing posts with label Matthew Hooten. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Matthew Hooten. Show all posts

Sunday, 30 November 2014

Discussing John Key


Censorship by the Listener?

Seemorerocks



On Thursday I heard an interview discussing the day's events with John Key suddenly backtracking on his confident assertion that he had not been in touch with right-wing blogger, Cameron Slater with Otago academic Bryce Edwards and right-wing commentator, Matthew Hooten.

Bryce Edwards raised the possibility that Key has been "leveraged" by Slater who has dirt on Key and National and has threatened to go "nuclear".

This was disavowed by Hooten who said there was more at stake than this.

The hairs on my head stood up when I heard the following (at 5'38" in the tape below):

Matthew Hooten: 'Jane Clifton has written in the Listener out today “It is not histrionics to say that John Key has brought us to the top of an abyss, at the bottom of which lies the Stasi” '





When I heard this I wandered down to my local dairy to buy the latest Listener (dated 29 November - 5 December, 2014).

To my surprise, there was no article about John Key with this quote by Jane Clifton.

Instead, there was an article on Andrew Little entitled "the Little Engine that could" (behind a pay wall).

What is one to conclude?

The one possibility is that Hooten who was reading a quote was wrong about the date of the article (that it might come out next week)

Or, the second possibility is that the article was pulled at the last minute by the editor.

Given the way that the Clifton quote gets to the centre of a politically-inconvenient truth,  I lean to the latter explantion.

Monday, 25 August 2014

Behind the headlines on the Dirty Politics revelations

I agree with Martin that this is not a Left or a Right issue - it affects every one of us.

The following interview with Mike Williams and Matthew Hooten is essential listening if you want to come to grips with what is at stake.

Matthew Hooten (arguing from the far-Right of the National Party is saying that if Key is right in his statements it is very bad; if he is right, it is even worse. 

It affects the security of the nation.

Please take the time to listen.

Why the Secret Intelligence Service feeding Cameron Slater information is so very, very, very serious

Martin Bradbury






25 August, 2014


Folks, it doesn’t matter if you are Right or Left, the issue of the Secret Intelligence Service being forced to feed a far right hate speech merchant like Cameron Slater with sensitive information is an ‘us’ issue.


The SIS are ‘deep State’. We ‘trust’ in them to use the vast powers they have for the protection of NZ. I think we can all see, regardless of how we vote, that getting them to release information to a blogger with the ethical standards of a drug cartel are well outside what is acceptable.
We know that the guidelines for the release of such information from the SIS requires consultation between Key, Ede and Eagleson for several days. The PM has stated in his video answer that he was briefed, he has since claimed that when he said “I was briefed’ he means something completely different, and that when public servants Tucker and Wakem both said he was briefed, they also meant something completely different.
So that’s 3 people saying the same thing but all meaning something completely different, and this is the tissue thin defence being erected to shrug off handing Cameron Slater of all people information sensitive within one of our spy agencies?
This just isn’t fucking good enough. This defence of “when I say me and I, I actually mean some faceless and anonymous ‘office’ where blame and responsibility can’t actually be established” isn’t a defence, it’s a declaration of incompetence that if true simply means all of them, the whole office, needs to go.
The Prime Minister is either incompetent or lying through his front teeth. Neither of which helps explain why someone as toxic as Slater was given access to SIS information.
Using the state spy apparatus to embarrass and smear political opponents is a dark and frighteningly dangerous moment in our political history, it can’t just be shrugged off with ‘my office was briefed’ as an answer.
Such casual fascism must be challenged.

Tuesday, 19 August 2014

More on dirty politics

Yesterday, or at least until the leak by @whaledump, I thought that National could ride this out and scrape through in the elections, in which case things would get VERY, VERY ugly in the country.

After listening to right-wing commentator, Matthew Hooten, who is not stranger to attack politics, I changed my mind.

I think Key and his corrupt, fascist government is toast.

You have to bear in mind that Matthew Hooten is a part of dirty politics – he figures amongst the characters of Nicky Hager's book and is part of 'the Hollow Men'

Never mind what ex-Labour president, Mike Williams says (he would)

If Matthew says what he does in this interview you have to to sit up.

Matthew Hooten on 'Dirty Politics'


Five days on from its release, Nine to Noon's political commentators Matthew Hooton and Mike Williams discuss the ongoing fallout from Nicky Hager's new book, Dirty Politics.

The book says blogger Cameron Slater received information from National Party insiders including a now-former member of John Key's staff, and the Justice Minister, Judith Collins.






Twitter email dump set up in advance

Radio NZ,
19 August, 2014

The release of emails and Facebook messages that formed the basis of book Dirty Politics were programmed several days in advance, according to a security expert specialising in the forensic investigation of IT systems.

Some of the material on which Wellington writer Nicky Hager based the book was released on Twitter yesterday afternoon by someone with the twitter handle of @Whaledump.

The 12 documents on Twitter are screen shots of emails between Whale Oil blogger Cameron Slater and others, including former Key staffer Jason Ede, the details of which are carried in the book.

Mr Hager had earlier said said although his source wouldn't allow him to release material, the source himself might.

Whaledump on Twitter.Whaledump on Twitter.


Security consultant Daniel Ayers said Whaledump was set more than a week before the 13 August launch of the book and the tweets written in advance and programmed to be released at a set time.

"The topic of Mr Hager's book was a closely guarded secret right up until its launch last week, so whoever knew to create a Twitter account called Whaledump on the 4th of August was obviously very close to the action," he said.



"And also the fact that the tweets are not being sent live suggests to me that somebody needs an alibi."

The chief executive of Computer Forensics Limited, Brian Eardley-Wilmot, warns the only way to tell whether the documents are real is to investigate the computer that captured the emails.

"Without access to the original email file you are not going to get anything that's provable at all. Anything that you guys out there are talking about may well be bogus."

A researcher at the University of Auckland, Peter Gutmann, said hacking a single person is difficult, but there's a criminal market with tools on sale to do this.

Mr Gutmann, computer hacking expert, said one way to target someone is to mock up an email just for them, and include a link they follow. That installs malicious software on their computer to capture passwords.




Radio New Zealand interviewed Labour Party leader, David Cunliffe




The mainstream media are like a dog with a bone. They have been insulted and will not let go. The tide has turned, I'm sure

Political editor analyses Dirty Politics fallout




The fascist Slug talks about hypocrisy. After doing the dirty on all his enemies he is rushing to the police.

Mr Slater, have you come across "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you"

Dirty Politics: Police assessing hacking claim

Police are assessing a complaint with a view towards launching an investigation into the hacking of Whaleoil blogger Cameron Slater's computer.

Police Headquarters were preparing to release a statement outlining its process following an emailed complaint from Slater