This
is part two of an article by Dr. Helen Caldicott. Part one is Endless
Fukushima catastrophe: Many generations’ health at stake
Endless
Fukushima catastrophe: 2020 Olympics under contamination threat
Helen
Caldicott
RT,
15
September, 2013
As
the escape of radiation at Fukushima seems virtually unstoppable,
there are still steps that governments all over the world should take
to prevent worst case consequences. One of them would be canceling
the 2020 Olympics in Tokyo.
Scientific
estimates predict that the radioactive plume travelling east across
the Pacific will likely hit the shores of Oregon, Washington State
and Canada early next year. California will probably be impacted
later that year. Because the ongoing flow of water from the reactor
site will be virtually impossible to stop, a radioactive plume will
continue to migrate across the Pacific affecting Hawaii, North
America, South America and eventually Australia for many decades.
We
are only talking about ocean currents, however, fish swim thousands
of miles and don’t necessarily follow the currents. As noted in
Part I, big fish concentrate radiation most efficiently, and tuna
have already been caught off the coast of California containing
cesium from Fukushima. Seaweed also efficiently concentrates
radioactive elements.
As
I contemplate the future at Fukushima, it seems that the escape of
radiation is virtually unstoppable. The levels of radiation in
buildings 1, 2 and 3 are now so high that no human can enter or get
close to the molten cores. It will therefore be impossible to remove
these cores for hundreds of years if ever.
Buildings
1, 2 & 3
If
one of these buildings collapses, the targeted flow of cooling water
to the pools and cores would cease, the cores would become red hot
and possibly ignite releasing massive amounts of radiation into the
air and water and the fuel in the cooling pools could ignite. It is
strange that neither the US government in particular nor the global
community seem to be concerned about these imminent possibilities and
exhibit no urge to avert catastrophe.
Similarly
the global media is strangely disconnected with the ongoing crisis.
Most importantly, the Japanese government until very recently has
obstinately refused to invite and collaborate with foreign experts
from nuclear engineering companies and/or governments.
Building
4
This
structure was severely damaged during the initial quake, its walls
are bulging, and it sank 31 inches (79cm) into the ground. On the
roof sits a cooling pool containing about 250 tons of hot fuel rods,
most of which had just been removed from the reactor core days before
the earthquake struck. This particular core did not melt because
TEPCO was able maintain a continuous flow of cooling water, so the
rods and their holding racks are still intact, but geometrically
deformed due to the force of the hydrogen explosion.
The
cooling pool contains 8,800 pounds of plutonium plus over 100 other
highly radioactive isotopes. Instead of this core melting into a
larval mass like the other three cores, it sits exposed to the air
atop the shaky building. A large earthquake could disrupt the
integrity of the building, causing it to collapse and taking the hot
fuel rods with it. The cooling water would evaporate and the
intrinsic heat of the radioactive rods would ignite a fire as the
zirconium cladding reacted with air, releasing the radioactive
equivalent of 14,000 Hiroshima-sized bombs and 10 times more cesium
than Chernobyl.
AFP
Photo / TEPCO
Not
only would the Northern Hemisphere become badly contaminated, but the
Japanese government is seriously contemplating evacuating 35 million
people from Tokyo should this happen. TEPCO has constructed a steel
frame to strengthen the shaky building in order to place a massive
crane on the roof so they can extract the hot rods by remote control.
This operation is always performed by computer and a remote
manually-controlled extraction has never been attempted before. If
the rods are deformed, a rod could fracture releasing so much
radiation that the workers would have to evacuate or, should they
touch each other, a chain reaction could release huge amounts of
radiation.
I
defer to Arnie Gundersen, a nuclear engineer in whom I have great
faith. He says
that a 2-meter thick zeolite wall should be constructed some distance
from the reactors on the mountainside, which would effectively absorb
the cesium from the water surrounding the reactor cores so it could
not get out and further pollute the pure water descending from the
mountain. At the same time, channels must be constructed to pump and
divert the unpolluted mountain water into the sea. Then the three
molten cores and their associated buildings could be immersed in
concrete as the Soviets did at Chernobyl, and the situation could
possibly be neutralized for about 100 years. What our poor
descendants will then decide to do with this radioactive rubbish dump
is beyond my comprehension.
However,
as one Japanese official said, “If
we just buried them no one would look at another nuclear plant for
years.”
An interesting reaction, so it is perfectly obvious that despite the
calamity, they still want to pursue the nuclear option.
North
America and Canada the EPA should immediately start monitoring the
fish routinely caught off the west coast and it must also, as a
matter of urgency, establish many effective airborne monitors up and
down the west coast and across the US continent, so that if there is
another large release of radiation it will be effectively measured
and the information rapidly passed on to the public. The same holds
true for Canada.
The
US and Canadian governments must forthwith ban imported food from
Japan, unless each batch is monitored for contamination, and the food
grown in the US and Canada needs to be effectively monitored pending
another major accident. The US has allowed food measuring up to 1,200
Becquerels per kilo to be sold in the US from Japan, while the
Japanese allowable concentration for food is only 100 Becquerels per
kilo. What does the US government think it is doing purposely
exposing people to radioactive food? This situation must be urgently
amended.
An
aerial view shows the Tokyo Electric Power Co.'s (TEPCO)
tsunami-crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant and its
contaminated water storage tanks (top) in Fukushima, in this photo
taken by Kyodo August 31, 2013.(Reuters /
Kyodo)
Nuclear
Olympics
Given
these impending problems, how can Japanese Prime Minister Abe
possibly say that Tokyo will be safe for the Olympics? He actually
said that “there is
absolutely no problem”
and “the situation is under
control.”
Does he not understand that parts of Tokyo are already radioactively
contaminated and that his government is dumping ashes from the
incineration of thousands of tons of radioactive debris from the
tsunami and earthquake into Tokyo Bay? Is this what the athletes will
be swimming in?
What
if there is another major release of radiation before the Olympics?
Young fit people who have spent years in rigorous training must,
under no circumstances be exposed to radioactive air, food or water.
And how can Abe possibly consider spending all thatmoney housing
people in expensive accommodation and constructing stadiums etc. when
his own people - 160,000 Fukushima refugees - live in shacks and
millions still live in highly radioactive zones and when the
Fukushima complex is out of control?
Dr
Helen Caldicott is one of the most articulate and passionate
advocates of citizen action to remedy the nuclear and environmental
crises.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.